• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位与生活方式干预在 2 型糖尿病预防中的效果:FIN-D2D 项目的一年随访结果。

Socioeconomic position and effectiveness of lifestyle intervention in prevention of type 2 diabetes: one-year follow-up of the FIN-D2D project.

机构信息

Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2011 Aug;39(6):561-70. doi: 10.1177/1403494811408482. Epub 2011 May 27.

DOI:10.1177/1403494811408482
PMID:21622677
Abstract

AIMS

Lifestyle intervention is effective in prevention of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in high-risk individuals. However, health behaviour and health outcomes are modified by socioeconomic position through various mechanisms. It is therefore possible that success in lifestyle intervention may be determined by factors such as level of education or occupation. In this study we assessed the impact of the level of education and occupation on the baseline anthropometric and clinical characteristics and their changes during a one-year follow-up in a cohort of Finnish men and women at high risk for T2D aged 20-64 years.

METHODS

As part of a Finnish national diabetes prevention programme 2003-2007 (FIN-D2D), high-risk individuals were identified using opportunistic screening for lifestyle intervention in primary health care. 1,067 men and 2,122 women had one-year follow-up data. Education and occupation were used as factors of socioeconomic position. Measures of anthropometric and clinical characteristics included weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total, HDL and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, FINDRISC scores and glucose tolerance status.

RESULTS

The effect of intervention was similar in all socioeconomic groups, but the level of education was related to glucose tolerance status in both genders. In addition, socioeconomic differences existed in blood pressure, weight, BMI, waist circumference and HDL cholesterol.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic position did not seem to have any impact on the effectiveness of lifestyle intervention in individuals at high risk for T2D, which is encouraging from the point of view of reducing health inequalities.

摘要

目的

生活方式干预在预防 2 型糖尿病(T2D)高危人群中是有效的。然而,社会经济地位通过多种机制影响健康行为和健康结果。因此,生活方式干预的成功可能取决于教育水平或职业等因素。在这项研究中,我们评估了教育水平和职业对基线人体测量和临床特征的影响,以及在芬兰 20-64 岁 T2D 高危人群一年随访期间这些特征的变化。

方法

作为芬兰国家糖尿病预防计划 2003-2007 年(FIN-D2D)的一部分,通过在初级保健中进行生活方式干预的机会性筛查来确定高危个体。1067 名男性和 2122 名女性有一年的随访数据。教育和职业被用作社会经济地位的因素。人体测量和临床特征的测量包括体重、体重指数(BMI)、腰围、收缩压和舒张压、总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL 胆固醇)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL 胆固醇)、甘油三酯、FINDRISC 评分和葡萄糖耐量状态。

结果

干预的效果在所有社会经济群体中都相似,但教育水平与两性的葡萄糖耐量状态有关。此外,血压、体重、BMI、腰围和 HDL 胆固醇方面存在社会经济差异。

结论

从减少健康不平等的角度来看,社会经济地位似乎对 T2D 高危人群生活方式干预的效果没有任何影响,这是令人鼓舞的。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic position and effectiveness of lifestyle intervention in prevention of type 2 diabetes: one-year follow-up of the FIN-D2D project.社会经济地位与生活方式干预在 2 型糖尿病预防中的效果:FIN-D2D 项目的一年随访结果。
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Aug;39(6):561-70. doi: 10.1177/1403494811408482. Epub 2011 May 27.
2
Family history of diabetes and effectiveness of lifestyle counselling on the cardio-metabolic risk profile in individuals at high risk of Type 2 diabetes: 1-year follow-up of the FIN-D2D project.家族糖尿病史和生活方式咨询对 2 型糖尿病高危个体心血管代谢风险特征的影响:FIN-D2D 项目的 1 年随访结果。
Diabet Med. 2012 Feb;29(2):207-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03388.x.
3
Participation, socioeconomic status and group or individual counselling intervention in individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes: one-year follow-up study of the FIN-D2D-project.2 型糖尿病高危个体的参与、社会经济地位以及团体或个体咨询干预:FIN-D2D 项目的一年随访研究。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2012 Dec;6(4):277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Aug 4.
4
Predictors of success of a lifestyle intervention in relation to weight loss and improvement in glucose tolerance among individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes: the FIN-D2D project.2型糖尿病高危个体中与体重减轻及糖耐量改善相关的生活方式干预成功的预测因素:芬兰糖尿病预防研究(FIN-D2D)项目
J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Jan;4(1):59-66. doi: 10.1177/2150131912444130. Epub 2012 May 14.
5
Reduction in incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention in a middle eastern community.生活方式干预对中东社区 2 型糖尿病发病率的降低作用。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):628-636.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.03.003.
6
Do depressive symptoms have an impact on the effectiveness of lifestyle counseling in prevention of type 2 diabetes? One-year follow-up of FIN-D2D.抑郁症状对生活方式咨询预防2型糖尿病的效果有影响吗?芬兰2型糖尿病预防研究(FIN-D2D)的一年随访。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2014 Apr;8(1):43-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
7
Determinants for the effectiveness of lifestyle intervention in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study.芬兰糖尿病预防研究中生活方式干预效果的决定因素。
Diabetes Care. 2008 May;31(5):857-62. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2162. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
8
Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program: a comprehensive model for prevention training and program delivery.将糖尿病预防计划进行翻译:预防培训和计划实施的综合模式。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6):505-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.020.
9
Effect of 5-year community intervention Hartslag Limburg on cardiovascular risk factors.林堡省哈特斯拉格为期5年的社区干预对心血管危险因素的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Mar;30(3):237-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.020.
10
Type 2 diabetes prevention in the "real world": one-year results of the GOAL Implementation Trial.“真实世界”中的2型糖尿病预防:GOAL实施试验的一年结果
Diabetes Care. 2007 Oct;30(10):2465-70. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0171. Epub 2007 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of individual and environmental factors on dietary or lifestyle interventions to prevent type 2 diabetes development: a systematic review.个体和环境因素对预防2型糖尿病发生的饮食或生活方式干预措施的影响:一项系统评价
Commun Med (Lond). 2023 Oct 5;3(1):133. doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00363-0.
2
The effect of a community-based group intervention on chronic disease self-management in a vulnerable population.基于社区的团体干预对弱势群体慢性病自我管理的效果。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 21;11:1221675. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1221675. eCollection 2023.
3
Impact of the built, social, and food environment on long-term weight loss within a behavioral weight loss intervention.
行为减肥干预中建筑环境、社会环境和食物环境对长期体重减轻的影响。
Obes Sci Pract. 2022 Nov 3;9(3):261-273. doi: 10.1002/osp4.645. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Use of primary health care services among older patients with and without diabetes.老年糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者对初级卫生保健服务的利用。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Sep 9;23(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01844-2.
5
Socioeconomic Position Disparities in Cardiovascular Health Before and After the Examination of Mechanisms of Exercise-Induced Weight Compensation Randomized Controlled Trial.运动诱导体重补偿机制随机对照试验前后心血管健康方面的社会经济地位差异
Health Equity. 2019 Aug 7;3(1):390-394. doi: 10.1089/heq.2019.0019. eCollection 2019.
6
Examination of Nutrition Literacy and Quality of Self-monitoring in Behavioral Weight Loss.营养素养与行为减肥自我监测质量的检查。
Ann Behav Med. 2018 Aug 16;52(9):809-816. doi: 10.1093/abm/kax052.
7
Weight loss expectations and determinants in a large community-based sample.基于大型社区样本的减肥期望与决定因素
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Aug 4;12:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.08.005. eCollection 2018 Dec.
8
A primary care lifestyle programme suitable for socioeconomically vulnerable groups - an observational study.一项适用于社会经济弱势群体的初级保健生活方式项目——一项观察性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Dec;34(4):352-359. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1248628.
9
Socioeconomic Disparities in Weight and Behavioral Outcomes Among American Indian and Alaska Native Participants of a Translational Lifestyle Intervention Project.一项转化性生活方式干预项目中美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民参与者体重及行为结果的社会经济差异
Diabetes Care. 2015 Nov;38(11):2090-9. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0394.
10
Combined Diet and Physical Activity Promotion Programs to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Among Persons at Increased Risk: A Systematic Review for the Community Preventive Services Task Force.联合饮食与身体活动促进项目预防高危人群2型糖尿病:社区预防服务工作组的系统评价
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 15;163(6):437-51. doi: 10.7326/M15-0452.