Grimberg Brian T, Mehlotra Rajeev K
Center for Global Health and Diseases, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Tel.: +1-216-368-6328 or +1-216-368-6172.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2011 May 1;4(5):681-712. doi: 10.3390/ph4050681.
The number of available and effective antimalarial drugs is quickly dwindling. This is mainly because a number of drug resistance-associated mutations in malaria parasite genes, such as crt, mdr1, dhfr/dhps, and others, have led to widespread resistance to all known classes of antimalarial compounds. Unfortunately, malaria parasites have started to exhibit some level of resistance in Southeast Asia even to the most recently introduced class of drugs, artemisinins. While there is much need, the antimalarial drug development pipeline remains woefully thin, with little chemical diversity, and there is currently no alternative to the precious artemisinins. It is difficult to predict where the next generation of antimalarial drugs will come from; however, there are six major approaches: (i) re-optimizing the use of existing antimalarials by either replacement/rotation or combination approach; (ii) repurposing drugs that are currently used to treat other infections or diseases; (iii) chemically modifying existing antimalarial compounds; (iv) exploring natural sources; (v) large-scale screening of diverse chemical libraries; and (vi) through parasite genome-based ("targeted") discoveries. When any newly discovered effective antimalarial treatment is used by the populus, we must maintain constant vigilance for both parasite-specific and human-related factors that are likely to hamper its success. This article is neither comprehensive nor conclusive. Our purpose is to provide an overview of antimalarial drug resistance, associated parasite genetic factors (1. Introduction; 2. Emergence of artemisinin resistance in P. falciparum), and the antimalarial drug development pipeline (3. Overview of the global pipeline of antimalarial drugs), and highlight some examples of the aforementioned approaches to future antimalarial treatment. These approaches can be categorized into "short term" (4. Feasible options for now) and "long term" (5. Next generation of antimalarial treatment-Approaches and candidates). However, these two categories are interrelated, and the approaches in both should be implemented in parallel with focus on developing a successful, long-lasting antimalarial chemotherapy.
可用且有效的抗疟药物数量正在迅速减少。这主要是因为疟原虫基因中一些与耐药性相关的突变,如crt、mdr1、dhfr/dhps等,已导致对所有已知类别的抗疟化合物产生广泛耐药性。不幸的是,疟原虫在东南亚甚至已开始对最近引入的一类药物青蒿素表现出一定程度的耐药性。尽管需求迫切,但抗疟药物研发渠道仍然严重不足,化学多样性有限,目前尚无青蒿素这一珍贵药物的替代物。很难预测下一代抗疟药物将来自何处;然而,有六种主要方法:(i)通过替代/轮换或联合方法重新优化现有抗疟药物的使用;(ii)重新利用目前用于治疗其他感染或疾病的药物;(iii)对现有抗疟化合物进行化学修饰;(iv)探索天然来源;(v)大规模筛选各种化学文库;(vi)通过基于寄生虫基因组的(“靶向”)发现。当大众使用任何新发现的有效抗疟治疗方法时,我们必须对可能阻碍其成功的寄生虫特异性和与人类相关的因素保持持续警惕。本文既不全面也无定论。我们的目的是概述抗疟药物耐药性、相关的寄生虫遗传因素(1. 引言;2. 恶性疟原虫青蒿素耐药性的出现)以及抗疟药物研发渠道(3. 全球抗疟药物研发渠道概述),并突出上述未来抗疟治疗方法的一些实例。这些方法可分为“短期”(4. 目前可行的选择)和“长期”(5. 下一代抗疟治疗——方法和候选药物)。然而,这两类是相互关联的,两类中的方法都应并行实施,重点是开发成功、持久的抗疟化疗方法。