• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[1.5和3.0特斯拉磁共振成像期间口腔内牙科磁体对通量密度的影响]

[Influence on flux density of intraoral dental magnets during 1.5 and 3.0 tesla MRI].

作者信息

Blankenstein F H, Truong B, Thomas A, Boeckler A, Peroz I

机构信息

Charité-Centrum 3 - Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

出版信息

Rofo. 2011 Aug;183(8):727-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1273424. Epub 2011 May 30.

DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1273424
PMID:21626468
Abstract

PURPOSE

When using dental duo-magnet systems, a mini-magnet remains in the jaw after removal of the prosthesis. In some cases, implant-borne magnets may be removed, whereas tooth-borne magnets are irreversibly fixed on a natural tooth root. The goal of this paper is to identify the impacts of the duration and orientation of exposure on these magnets in a 1.5 or 3 Tesla MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this study, 30 SmCo and 60 NdFeB magnets were used. During the first experiment, they were exposed with free orientation for 64 minutes. During the second experiment, the magnets were fixed in position and exposed at 1.5 and 3 Tesla while aligned in a parallel or antiparallel direction.

RESULTS

While the duration of exposure in MRI is irrelevant, the orientation is not. The coercive field strength of these NdFeB and SmCo alloys is not sufficient to reliably withstand demagnetization in a 1.5 or 3 T MRI when aligned in an antiparallel direction. At 1.5 T neodymium magnets were reduced to approx. 34 % and samarium magnets to approx. 92 % of their initial values. At 3 T all magnets were reversed.

CONCLUSION

As a precaution, the worst-case scenario, i. e. an antiparallel orientation, should be assumed when using a duo-magnet system. If an MRI can be postponed, the general dentist should remove implant-borne magnets. If there is a vital indication, irreversible damage to the magnets is acceptable in consultation with the patient since the replacement costs are irrelevant given the underlying disease.

摘要

目的

使用牙科双磁体系统时,去除假体后颌骨中会残留一个微型磁体。在某些情况下,种植体支持的磁体可以取出,而牙支持的磁体则不可逆地固定在天然牙根上。本文的目的是确定在1.5或3特斯拉的磁共振成像(MRI)中,暴露时间和方向对这些磁体的影响。

材料与方法

本研究使用了30个钐钴磁体和60个钕铁硼磁体。在第一个实验中,它们以自由方向暴露64分钟。在第二个实验中,磁体固定在适当位置,并在1.5和3特斯拉下以平行或反平行方向排列时进行暴露。

结果

虽然在MRI中的暴露时间无关紧要,但方向并非如此。当这些钕铁硼和钐钴合金磁体以反平行方向排列时,其矫顽场强不足以可靠地承受1.5或3特斯拉MRI中的退磁。在1.5特斯拉时,钕磁体降至其初始值的约34%,钐磁体降至约92%。在3特斯拉时,所有磁体都发生了反转。

结论

作为预防措施,使用双磁体系统时应假设最坏的情况,即反平行方向。如果可以推迟MRI检查,普通牙医应取出种植体支持的磁体。如果有重要指征,在与患者协商后,磁体的不可逆损伤是可以接受的,因为鉴于潜在疾病,更换成本无关紧要。

相似文献

1
[Influence on flux density of intraoral dental magnets during 1.5 and 3.0 tesla MRI].[1.5和3.0特斯拉磁共振成像期间口腔内牙科磁体对通量密度的影响]
Rofo. 2011 Aug;183(8):727-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1273424. Epub 2011 May 30.
2
Corrosion of dental magnet attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.用于牙齿和种植体上可摘义齿的牙科磁体附件的腐蚀
J Prosthodont. 2009 Jun;18(4):301-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00431.x. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
3
Magnet-retained implant-supported overdentures: review and 1-year clinical report.磁性固位种植体支持的覆盖义齿:综述与1年临床报告。
J Can Dent Assoc. 2010;76:a52.
4
[Alteration of flux density of highly coercive SmCo magnets used in prosthodontics and epithetics in 1.5 T and 3 T MRI].
Radiologe. 2019 Oct;59(10):912-919. doi: 10.1007/s00117-019-0563-0.
5
Orthodontic magnets. A study of force and field pattern, biocompatibility and clinical effects.正畸磁体。力与场模式、生物相容性及临床效果的研究。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 1994;99:1-148.
6
Mechanical properties of magnetic attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.用于牙齿和种植体上可摘义齿的磁性附着体的力学性能。
J Prosthodont. 2008 Dec;17(8):608-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00356.x.
7
[Signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging caused by intraoral anchored dental magnetic materials].[口腔内固定牙科磁性材料导致的磁共振成像信号丢失]
Rofo. 2006 Aug;178(8):787-93. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-926817.
8
Breakaway forces of flat and domed surfaced Magfit implant magnet attachments.扁平及圆顶表面Magfit种植体磁附着体的分离力
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2007 Mar;15(1):7-12.
9
MRI induced torque and demagnetization in retention magnets for a bone conduction implant.用于骨传导植入物的保持磁体中的磁共振成像诱导扭矩和退磁
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014 Jun;61(6):1887-93. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2309978.
10
The corrosion behavior of Nd2Fe14B and SmCo5 magnets.
Dent Mater J. 1992 Dec;11(2):119-29. doi: 10.4012/dmj.11.119.

引用本文的文献

1
[Alteration of flux density of highly coercive SmCo magnets used in prosthodontics and epithetics in 1.5 T and 3 T MRI].
Radiologe. 2019 Oct;59(10):912-919. doi: 10.1007/s00117-019-0563-0.
2
Metal artefact reduction in MRI at both 1.5 and 3.0 T using slice encoding for metal artefact correction and view angle tilting.在1.5T和3.0T磁共振成像中,采用切片编码金属伪影校正和视角倾斜技术减少金属伪影。
Br J Radiol. 2015 Apr;88(1048):20140601. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140601. Epub 2015 Jan 23.