Suppr超能文献

医生参与医师质量报告倡议及其对医疗质量影响的看法。

Physicians' participation in the Physicians' Quality Reporting Initiative and their perceptions of its impact on quality of care.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, United States.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2011 Oct;102(2-3):229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 May 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medicare established the Physicians Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI, recently renamed the Physicians Quality Reporting System) to increase reporting of quality metrics and promote healthcare quality.

OBJECTIVE

To identify characteristics of PQRI participants and examine their beliefs about its impact.

DESIGN

National survey of 4934 U.S. physicians, conducted June through October 2009.

SETTING

All practice settings.

PARTICIPANTS

Randomly selected physicians categorized as primary care, medical specialists, surgeons, other specialists.

MEASUREMENTS

Beliefs about impact of PQRI reporting on quality.

RESULTS

The response rate was 49.8%. There were no significant differences between respondents and non-respondents by age, gender, specialty, and region. Thirty-eight percent participated in the PQRI, and were more likely than non-participants to be practice owners (69.0% vs. 57.1%, p<.0001) and to receive performance bonuses through their employer or practice (50.4% vs. 37.0%, p<.0001). Half of PQRI participants believed it had no impact on quality. Medical specialists (57.0%) and surgeons (55.1%) were more likely than primary care (40.4%) and other physicians (45.7%) to say that PQRI has no impact on quality (p=.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Most PQRI participants believed it had little if any impact on quality. Medicare should identify the reasons behind physicians' negative views while it works to expand the Physicians Quality Reporting System.

摘要

背景

医疗保险建立了医师质量报告倡议(PQRI,最近更名为医师质量报告系统),以增加质量指标的报告并促进医疗保健质量。

目的

确定 PQRI 参与者的特征,并研究他们对其影响的看法。

设计

对 2009 年 6 月至 10 月期间的 4934 名美国医生进行的全国性调查。

地点

所有执业地点。

参与者

随机选择的被归类为初级保健医生、医学专家、外科医生、其他专家的医生。

测量

对 PQRI 报告对质量的影响的看法。

结果

回应率为 49.8%。应答者和未应答者在年龄、性别、专业和地区方面没有显著差异。38%的人参加了 PQRI,与未参加者相比,他们更有可能是执业医生(69.0%对 57.1%,p<.0001),并且通过雇主或诊所获得绩效奖金(50.4%对 37.0%,p<.0001)。一半的 PQRI 参与者认为它对质量没有影响。医学专家(57.0%)和外科医生(55.1%)比初级保健医生(40.4%)和其他医生(45.7%)更有可能表示 PQRI 对质量没有影响(p=.004)。

结论

大多数 PQRI 参与者认为它对质量几乎没有影响。医疗保险应在努力扩大医师质量报告系统的同时,找出医生负面看法的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验