Suppr超能文献

在单个医疗机构中使用多个电子病历系统。

Use of more than one electronic medical record system within a single health care organization.

机构信息

Departments of Medicine, Health Services and Biomedical & Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle , WA.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2012 Dec 12;3(4):462-74. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2012-10-RA-0040. Print 2012.

Abstract

Healthcare organizations vary in the number of electronic medical record (EMR) systems they use. Some use a single EMR for nearly all care they provide, while others use EMRs from more than one vendor. These strategies create a mixture of advantages, risks and costs. Based on our experience in two organizations over a decade, we analyzed use of more than one EMR within our two health care organizations to identify advantages, risks and costs that use of more than one EMR presents. We identified the data and functionality types that pose the greatest challenge to patient safety and efficiency. We present a model to classify patterns of use of more than one EMR within a single healthcare organization, and identified the most important 28 data types and 4 areas of functionality that in our experience present special challenges and safety risks with use of more than one EMR within a single healthcare organization. The use of more than one EMR in a single organization may be the chosen approach for many reasons, but in our organizations the limitations of this approach have also become clear. Those who use and support EMRs realize that to safely and efficiently use more than one EMR, a considerable amount of IT work is necessary. Thorough understanding of the challenges in using more than one EMR is an important prerequisite to minimizing the risks of using more than one EMR to care for patients in a single healthcare organization.

摘要

医疗机构在使用电子病历 (EMR) 系统的数量上存在差异。有些机构几乎所有的医疗服务都使用单一的 EMR,而有些机构则使用来自多个供应商的 EMR。这些策略创造了一系列的优势、风险和成本。基于我们在两个组织中十年来的经验,我们分析了我们两个医疗保健组织中使用多个 EMR 的情况,以确定使用多个 EMR 带来的优势、风险和成本。我们确定了对患者安全和效率构成最大挑战的数据和功能类型。我们提出了一个模型来对单个医疗机构中使用多个 EMR 的模式进行分类,并确定了在我们的经验中,使用多个 EMR 时特别具有挑战性和安全风险的 28 种最重要的数据类型和 4 个功能领域。出于多种原因,单个组织中使用多个 EMR 可能是首选方法,但在我们的组织中,这种方法的局限性也变得很明显。那些使用和支持 EMR 的人意识到,要安全、高效地使用多个 EMR,需要进行大量的 IT 工作。深入了解使用多个 EMR 所面临的挑战,是将使用多个 EMR 为单个医疗机构中的患者提供护理的风险降至最低的重要前提。

相似文献

1
Use of more than one electronic medical record system within a single health care organization.
Appl Clin Inform. 2012 Dec 12;3(4):462-74. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2012-10-RA-0040. Print 2012.
2
Factors affecting the mature use of electronic medical records by primary care physicians: a systematic review.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Feb 19;21(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01434-9.
4
A review of electronic medical record keeping on mobile medical service trips in austere settings.
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Feb;98:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
6
Copy-Pasting in Patients' Electronic Medical Records (EMRs): Use Judiciously and With Caution.
Cureus. 2023 Jun 15;15(6):e40486. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40486. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Hospital electronic medical record use and cost of inpatient pediatric care.
Acad Pediatr. 2012 Sep-Oct;12(5):429-35. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
9
Barriers to organizational adoption of EMR systems in family physician practices: a mixed-methods study in Canada.
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Aug;83(8):548-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Ten tips to carry out video consultations in nephrology.
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Sep 14;17(10):sfae287. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae287. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Potential Benefits of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and Blockchain Technology in Dermatology.
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2024 Jan 1;14(1):e2024061. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1401a61.
5
The Utility of Oncology Information Systems for Prognostic Modelling in Head and Neck Cancer.
J Med Syst. 2023 Jan 14;47(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01907-6.
8
Single-Vendor Electronic Health Record Use Is Associated With Greater Opportunities for Organizational and Clinical Care Improvements.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2022 May 31;6(3):269-278. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.05.001. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Infobuttons for Genomic Medicine: Requirements and Barriers.
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Mar;12(2):383-390. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729164. Epub 2021 May 12.

本文引用的文献

2
Escaping the EHR trap--the future of health IT.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 14;366(24):2240-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1203102.
3
Effect of patient- and medication-related factors on inpatient medication reconciliation errors.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):924-32. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2003-y. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
4
Health-information exchange: why are we doing it, and what are we doing?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):678-82. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000021. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
5
Physicians' participation in the Physicians' Quality Reporting Initiative and their perceptions of its impact on quality of care.
Health Policy. 2011 Oct;102(2-3):229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 May 31.
6
Normalized names for clinical drugs: RxNorm at 6 years.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):441-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000116. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
7
Best-of-breed versus integrated systems.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010 Sep 1;67(17):1406, 1408, 1410. doi: 10.2146/ajhp100061.
9
Launching HITECH.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 4;362(5):382-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0912825. Epub 2009 Dec 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验