Neurophysiology Service, Instituto Lauro de Souza Lima, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Jun;28(3):329-32. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e31821c3ac1.
Neuropathic pain (NP) is a well-recognized feature of leprosy neuropathy. However, the diagnosis of NP is difficult using only clinical criteria. In the study reported here, by means of conventional nerve conduction studies, the authors sought for an association between long-latency responses and NP complaints in leprosy patients with type 1 and 2 reactions. Of the 27 ulnar nerves of leprosy patients, 18 with type 1 reaction (T1R) and 9 with type 2 reaction (T2R) were followed-up for 6 months before and after steroid treatment. Clinical characteristics of pain complaints and clinical function were assessed, as well as the presence of F- and A-waves of the ulnar nerve using nerve conduction studies. The clinical and the neurophysiologic findings were compared to note positive concordances (presence of NP and A-waves together) and negative concordances (absence of NP and A-waves together) before and after treatment. Both reactions presented a high frequency of A-waves (61.1% in T1R and 66.7% in T2R, P < 0.05) and prolonged F-waves (69.4% in T1R and 65.8% in T2R, P = 0.4). No concordances were seen between pain complaints and F-waves. However, significant concordances between NP and A-waves were observed, although restricted to the T2R group (χ(2) = 5.65, P = 0.04). After treatment, there was a significant reduction in pain complaints, as well as the presence of F- and A-waves in both groups (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). In conclusion, the presence of A-waves correlates well with pain complaints of neuropathic characteristics in leprosy patients, especially in those with type 2 reaction. Probably, such response shares similar mechanisms with the small-fiber dysfunction seen in these patients with NP, such as demyelination, intraneural edema, and axonal sprouting. Further studies using specific tools for small-fiber assessment are warranted to confirm our findings.
神经病理性疼痛(NP)是麻风性神经病的一种公认特征。然而,仅使用临床标准诊断 NP 较为困难。在本研究中,作者通过常规的神经传导研究,旨在寻找麻风患者 1 型和 2 型反应中潜伏期反应与 NP 投诉之间的关联。在 27 条尺神经中,18 条 1 型反应(T1R)和 9 条 2 型反应(T2R)在类固醇治疗前后进行了 6 个月的随访。评估了疼痛投诉的临床特征和临床功能,以及使用神经传导研究评估尺神经 F-波和 A-波的存在。比较了治疗前后的临床和神经生理发现,以注意阳性一致性(同时存在 NP 和 A-波)和阴性一致性(同时不存在 NP 和 A-波)。两种反应均表现出高频率的 A-波(T1R 为 61.1%,T2R 为 66.7%,P<0.05)和延长的 F-波(T1R 为 69.4%,T2R 为 65.8%,P=0.4)。疼痛投诉与 F-波之间没有一致性。然而,在 T2R 组中观察到 NP 和 A-波之间存在显著一致性(χ(2)=5.65,P=0.04)。治疗后,两组疼痛投诉以及 F-和 A-波的存在均显著减少(所有比较均 P<0.05)。总之,A-波的存在与麻风患者神经病理性疼痛投诉密切相关,尤其是 2 型反应患者。可能,这种反应与这些 NP 患者小纤维功能障碍具有相似的机制,如脱髓鞘、神经内水肿和轴突发芽。需要进一步使用小纤维评估的特定工具进行研究,以证实我们的发现。