• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Exploring personality - personality disorder relations and their implications for DSM-5.

作者信息

D Miller Joshua

机构信息

University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

出版信息

World Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;10(2):110-1. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00028.x.

DOI:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00028.x
PMID:21633683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3104882/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Exploring personality - personality disorder relations and their implications for DSM-5.探索人格与人格障碍的关系及其对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版的影响。
World Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;10(2):110-1. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00028.x.
2
Can DSM-IV borderline personality disorder be diagnosed via dimensional personality traits? Implications for the DSM-5 personality disorder proposal.DSM-IV 边缘型人格障碍能否通过维度人格特征来诊断？对 DSM-5 人格障碍提案的影响。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Nov;121(4):944-950. doi: 10.1037/a0027410. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
3
Measures of Narcissism and Their Relations to DSM-5 Pathological Traits: A Critical Reappraisal.自恋的测量及其与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版病理特征的关系：批判性重新评估
Assessment. 2016 Feb;23(1):3-9. doi: 10.1177/1073191114522909. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
4
Comparing borderline definitions: DSM-III borderline and schizotypal personality disorders.比较边缘性人格障碍的定义：《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版中的边缘型与分裂型人格障碍。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1989 May;98(2):161-9. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.98.2.161.
5
The relationship between five-factor model and diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder-fifth edition personality traits on patients with antisocial personality disorder.五因素模型与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册（第五版）》中反社会型人格障碍患者人格特质之间的关系
J Res Med Sci. 2015 May;20(5):470-6. doi: 10.4103/1735-1995.163970.
6
Avoidant personality disorder and taijin kyoufu: sociocultural implications of the WHO/ADAMHA International Study of Personality Disorders in Japan.回避型人格障碍与恐人症：世界卫生组织/美国国立精神卫生研究所日本人格障碍国际研究的社会文化意义
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996 Mar;93(3):172-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb10626.x.
7
Relating DSM-5 section II and section III personality disorder diagnostic classification systems to treatment planning.将 DSM-5 第二部分和第三部分人格障碍诊断分类系统与治疗计划相关联。
Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Jul;68:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
8
Symptoms of prototypic patients with passive-aggressive personality disorder: DSM-IIIR versus DSM-IV negativistic.
Compr Psychiatry. 1998 Sep-Oct;39(5):287-95. doi: 10.1016/s0010-440x(98)90037-2.
9
Structure of the DSM-IV personality disorders as revealed in clinician ratings.DSM-IV 人格障碍的结构在临床医生评定中揭示。
Compr Psychiatry. 2013 May;54(4):326-33. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.10.014. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
10
The relationship between early life events and DSM III personality disorders.早期生活事件与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版人格障碍之间的关系。
Hillside J Clin Psychiatry. 1986;8(2):164-73.

本文引用的文献

1
Using clinician-rated five-factor model data to score the DSM-IV personality disorders.使用临床医生评定的五因素模型数据对 DSM-IV 人格障碍进行评分。
J Pers Assess. 2010 Jul;92(4):296-305. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.481984.
2
Examining the reliability and validity of clinician ratings on the Five-Factor Model Score Sheet.检验 Five-Factor Model 评分表上临床医生评分的信度和效度。
Assessment. 2010 Dec;17(4):440-53. doi: 10.1177/1073191110372210. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
3
A simplified technique for scoring DSM-IV personality disorders with the Five-Factor Model.一种运用五因素模型对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍进行评分的简化技术。
Assessment. 2005 Dec;12(4):404-15. doi: 10.1177/1073191105280987.
4
Two-year prevalence and stability of individual DSM-IV criteria for schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders: toward a hybrid model of axis II disorders.分裂型、边缘型、回避型及强迫型人格障碍的个体DSM-IV标准的两年患病率及稳定性：迈向轴II障碍的混合模型
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 May;162(5):883-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.883.
5
A search for consensus on the dimensional structure of personality disorders.寻求关于人格障碍维度结构的共识。
J Clin Psychol. 2005 Mar;61(3):323-45. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20017.
6
The validity of the five-factor model prototypes for personality disorders in two clinical samples.五因素模型人格障碍原型在两个临床样本中的有效性。
Psychol Assess. 2004 Sep;16(3):310-22. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.3.310.
7
Clinicians' personality descriptions of prototypic personality disorders.临床医生对典型人格障碍的个性描述。
J Pers Disord. 2004 Jun;18(3):286-308. doi: 10.1521/pedi.18.3.286.35446.
8
The longitudinal relationship of personality traits and disorders.人格特质与障碍的纵向关系。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2004 May;113(2):217-27. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.113.2.217.
9
Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: an expert consensus approach.使用五因素模型来代表《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版中的人格障碍：一种专家共识方法。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2001 Aug;110(3):401-12. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.110.3.401.