Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Department of Pediatrics, CHU Lenval Hospital, University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011 Dec;46(12):1209-14. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21492. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
The impulse oscillation system (IOS) allows easy measurement of respiratory system impedance (Zrs). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the accuracy of IOS parameters obtained during methacholine challenge by comparison with "the gold standard" forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1).
Measurements of FEV1 and resistances at 5 and 20 Hz, reactance at 5 Hz, impedance at 5 Hz and resonant frequency were performed in 227 children with suspected asthma, before and during methacholine challenge. Data were analyzed in the overall population and in three subgroups according to the final diagnosis: asthma (n = 72), chronic cough and nonspecific respiratory symptoms (n = 122), allergic rhinitis (n = 33).
All IOS parameters changed significantly during the tests but only changes in X5 were significantly different between responders and nonresponders. Moreover, changes in IOS parameters were not correlated with changes in FEV1 apart from a weak correlation for X5. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for changes in X5 (to predict a 20% decrease in FEV1 showed a best decision level for a 50% decrease in X5 with a sensitivity of 36% and a specificity of 85%. Results were not different in the asthma group.
The accuracy of measurements by IOS during methacholine bronchial challenge in children was not suitable when compared with FEV1 . It could be assumed that spirometry and IOS, while both providing indirect indices of airway patency, are exploring different mechanisms, each with its own methodological potentials and limitations.
脉冲震荡系统(IOS)可方便测量呼吸系统阻抗(Zrs)。本回顾性研究旨在通过与“金标准”——第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)比较,评估在乙酰甲胆碱激发试验中获得的 IOS 参数的准确性。
在怀疑患有哮喘的 227 例儿童中,分别在乙酰甲胆碱激发试验前和激发过程中进行 FEV1 和 5、20 Hz 时的阻力、5 Hz 时的电抗、5 Hz 时的阻抗和共振频率的测量。对所有患者的数据进行了整体分析,并根据最终诊断将其分为三个亚组:哮喘(n=72)、慢性咳嗽和非特异性呼吸道症状(n=122)、过敏性鼻炎(n=33)。
所有 IOS 参数在测试过程中均发生显著变化,但仅响应者和非响应者之间的 X5 变化存在显著差异。此外,IOS 参数的变化与 FEV1 的变化无关,除了 X5 之间存在弱相关性。X5 变化预测 FEV1 下降 20%的 ROC 曲线显示,X5 下降 50%的最佳决策水平,其灵敏度为 36%,特异性为 85%。在哮喘组中,结果并无差异。
与 FEV1 相比,IOS 在儿童乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验中的测量准确性不高。可以假设,尽管肺活量测定法和 IOS 都提供了气道通畅性的间接指标,但它们所探索的机制不同,各自具有不同的方法学潜力和局限性。