Kuwajima I, Hoh E, Suzuki Y, Matsushita S, Kuramoto K
Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Japan.
J Hypertens. 1990 May;8(5):429-32. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199005000-00006.
Pseudohypertension is a condition in which indirect blood pressure measured by the cuff method overestimates the true intra-arterial blood pressure. Despite the clinical importance of pseudohypertension, reports regarding its prevalence are scarce. We compared direct measurements of brachial arterial blood pressure with those measured indirectly by the cuff method in 59 healthy volunteers aged greater than 65 years, with or without hypertension, in order to investigate the prevalence of pseudohypertension in the elderly. The average systolic blood pressure of 161.5 mmHg obtained by the indirect method was significantly lower than the 169.2 mmHg obtained by the direct method was not significantly different from the 76.9 mmHg obtained by the direct method. Only one volunteer was observed in whom the indirect cuff method overestimated the diastolic blood pressure by greater than 10 mmHg, which was defined as pseudohypertension. Thus, the prevalence of pseudohypertension was only 1.7%. The difference in systolic blood pressure between the two methods was 8.7 mmHg in Osler-positive cases and was not significantly different from the 6.9 mmHg observed in Osler-negative cases. Pulse wave velocity was significantly correlated with the systolic blood pressure (y = 11.4x + 66.1, r = 0.65, P less than 0.05). No correlation was observed between the pulse wave velocity and direct/indirect pressure differences for either systolic or diastolic measurements. These results show that the prevalence of pseudohypertension is very low in a non-selected elderly population and that Osler's maneuver was not related to the pressure difference between the direct and indirect methods.
假性高血压是一种通过袖带法测量的间接血压高估真实动脉内血压的情况。尽管假性高血压具有临床重要性,但其患病率的相关报道却很稀少。我们比较了59名年龄大于65岁、患有或未患有高血压的健康志愿者的肱动脉血压直接测量值与通过袖带法间接测量的值,以调查老年人中假性高血压的患病率。间接法测得的平均收缩压为161.5 mmHg,显著低于直接法测得的169.2 mmHg,舒张压为76.9 mmHg,两者无显著差异。仅观察到一名志愿者,其通过间接袖带法测得的舒张压高估超过10 mmHg,这被定义为假性高血压。因此,假性高血压的患病率仅为1.7%。在奥氏征阳性病例中,两种方法测得的收缩压差值为8.7 mmHg,与奥氏征阴性病例中观察到的6.9 mmHg无显著差异。脉搏波速度与收缩压显著相关(y = 11.4x + 66.1,r = 0.65,P < 0.05)。在收缩压或舒张压测量中,未观察到脉搏波速度与直接/间接压力差值之间存在相关性。这些结果表明,在未经过筛选的老年人群中,假性高血压的患病率非常低,并且奥氏手法与直接法和间接法之间的压力差值无关。