Finnegan T P, Spence J D, Wong D G, Wells G A
J Hypertens. 1985 Jun;3(3):231-5. doi: 10.1097/00004872-198506000-00006.
Intra-arterial (radial) blood pressure (BP) measurement was compared with the indirect cuff method in 55 healthy volunteers aged from 59-80 years (mean 68.6 +/- 5.2 s.d.). On average, the cuff method underestimated systolic BP by 5 mmHg and overestimated diastolic BP by 8 mmHg. Cuff measurement underestimated systolic BP by greater than 10 mmHg in 17 cases, and by greater than 20 mmHg in three cases. The cuff method overestimated diastolic BP by greater than 10 mmHg in nine cases (one greater than 20 mmHg) and in two cases the cuff overestimated diastolic BP by greater than 30 mmHg, compared with intra-arterial pressures. The differences correlated with pulse wave velocity, an index of arterial stiffness. A pulse wave velocity index reflecting the entire length from the aortic root to the posterior tibial artery (PWVI/ao-pt) gave a correlation (r) of 0.48 (P less than 0.0005) with systolic arterial/cuff (A/C) difference, a correlation of 0.43 (P less than 0.001) with diastolic A/C difference, and a correlation of 0.57 (P less than 0.00001) with the A/C difference in measurement of mean arterial pressure. A positive but weaker correlation was observed between A/C difference and PWVI aorta-femoral. Although the pressure differences were not as great in these healthy elderly subjects as in previous studies of patients suspected of having pseudo-hypertension, caution still appears to be indicated in the interpretation of cuff blood pressure measurement in the elderly.
在55名年龄在59至80岁(平均68.6±5.2标准差)的健康志愿者中,比较了桡动脉有创血压测量与间接袖带法测量的结果。平均而言,袖带法低估收缩压5 mmHg,高估舒张压8 mmHg。袖带测量法在17例中低估收缩压超过10 mmHg,在3例中低估超过20 mmHg。与有创动脉压相比,袖带法在9例中高估舒张压超过10 mmHg(1例超过20 mmHg),在2例中高估舒张压超过30 mmHg。这些差异与动脉僵硬度指标脉搏波速度相关。反映从主动脉根部到胫后动脉全长的脉搏波速度指数(PWVI/ao-pt)与收缩期动脉/袖带(A/C)差值的相关性(r)为0.48(P<0.0005),与舒张期A/C差值的相关性为0.43(P<0.001),与平均动脉压测量中A/C差值的相关性为0.57(P<0.00001)。在A/C差值与主动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度之间观察到正相关但较弱。尽管这些健康老年人中的压力差异不如先前对疑似假性高血压患者的研究中那么大,但在解释老年人袖带血压测量结果时仍需谨慎。