• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估癌症治疗中的跨学科影响。

Evaluation of the impact of interdisciplinarity in cancer care.

机构信息

Charles LeMoyne Hospital Research Center, Greenfield Park, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jun 3;11:144. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-144.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-11-144
PMID:21639897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3129294/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Teamwork is a key component of the health care renewal strategy emphasized in Quebec, elsewhere in Canada and in other countries to enhance the quality of oncology services. While this innovation would appear beneficial in theory, empirical evidences of its impact are limited. Current efforts in Quebec to encourage the development of local interdisciplinary teams in all hospitals offer a unique opportunity to assess the anticipated benefits. These teams working in hospital outpatient clinics are responsible for treatment, follow-up and patient support. The study objective is to assess the impact of interdisciplinarity on cancer patients and health professionals.

METHODS/DESIGN: This is a quasi-experimental study with three comparison groups distinguished by intensity of interdisciplinarity: strong, moderate and weak. The study will use a random sample of 12 local teams in Quebec, stratified by intensity of interdisciplinarity. The instrument to measure the intensity of the interdisciplinarity, developed in collaboration with experts, encompasses five dimensions referring to aspects of team structure and process. Self-administered questionnaires will be used to measure the impact of interdisciplinarity on patients (health care utilization, continuity of care and cancer services responsiveness) and on professionals (professional well-being, assessment of teamwork and perception of teamwork climate). Approximately 100 health professionals working on the selected teams and 2000 patients will be recruited. Statistical analyses will include descriptive statistics and comparative analysis of the impact observed according to the strata of interdisciplinarity. Fixed and random multivariate statistical models (multilevel analyses) will also be used.

DISCUSSION

This study will pinpoint to what extent interdisciplinarity is linked to quality of care and meets the complex and varied needs of cancer patients. It will ascertain to what extent interdisciplinary teamwork facilitated the work of professionals. Such findings are important given the growing prevalence of cancer and the importance of attracting and retaining health professionals to work with cancer patients.

摘要

背景

团队合作是魁北克、加拿大其他地区和其他国家强调的医疗保健更新战略的关键组成部分,旨在提高肿瘤服务质量。虽然这一创新在理论上似乎有益,但其实践效果的证据有限。目前,魁北克正在努力鼓励所有医院发展当地的跨学科团队,这为评估预期效益提供了一个独特的机会。这些在医院门诊工作的团队负责治疗、随访和患者支持。本研究旨在评估跨学科性对癌症患者和卫生专业人员的影响。

方法/设计:这是一项准实验研究,有三个比较组,按跨学科性的强度区分:强、中、弱。该研究将使用随机抽取的 12 个魁北克当地团队的样本,按跨学科性的强度进行分层。该研究与专家合作开发了一种衡量跨学科性强度的工具,包括五个维度,涉及团队结构和流程的各个方面。将使用自我管理问卷来衡量跨学科性对患者(医疗保健利用、护理连续性和癌症服务响应)和专业人员(专业幸福感、团队合作评估和团队合作氛围感知)的影响。大约 100 名在选定团队工作的卫生专业人员和 2000 名患者将被招募。统计分析将包括描述性统计和根据跨学科性的分层观察到的影响的比较分析。还将使用固定和随机多变量统计模型(多层次分析)。

讨论

本研究将确定跨学科性在多大程度上与护理质量相关,并满足癌症患者复杂多样的需求。它将确定跨学科团队合作在多大程度上促进了专业人员的工作。鉴于癌症的发病率不断上升,以及吸引和留住卫生专业人员与癌症患者合作的重要性,这些发现非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211a/3129294/9fe04767038d/1472-6963-11-144-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211a/3129294/10531aea922a/1472-6963-11-144-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211a/3129294/9fe04767038d/1472-6963-11-144-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211a/3129294/10531aea922a/1472-6963-11-144-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211a/3129294/9fe04767038d/1472-6963-11-144-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the impact of interdisciplinarity in cancer care.评估癌症治疗中的跨学科影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jun 3;11:144. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-144.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Effects of interdisciplinary teamwork on patient-reported experience of cancer care.跨学科团队合作对患者报告的癌症护理体验的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 20;17(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2166-7.
4
Optimizing clinical and organizational practice in cancer survivor transitions between specialized oncology and primary care teams: a realist evaluation of multiple case studies.优化癌症幸存者在专科肿瘤团队和初级保健团队之间过渡的临床及组织实践:多案例研究的现实主义评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 16;17(1):834. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2785-z.
5
Variables associated with interprofessional collaboration: The case of professionals working in Quebec local mental health service networks.与跨专业协作相关的变量:魁北克地方心理健康服务网络中的专业人员案例
J Interprof Care. 2019 Jan-Feb;33(1):76-84. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1515191. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
6
[Validation of the IPC65 questionnaire: a tool to measure interdisciplinarity in clinical practice].
Sante Publique. 2013 Nov-Dec;25(6):763-73.
7
Modelling the effect of perceived interdependence among mental healthcare professionals on their work role performance.模拟精神卫生保健专业人员之间感知到的相互依赖对其工作角色表现的影响。
J Interprof Care. 2017 Jul;31(4):520-528. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1305951. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
8
Measuring interdisciplinarity in clinical practice with IPC59, a modified and improved version of IPC65.用 IPC59(IPC65 的改良和改进版本)测量临床实践中的跨学科性。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0197484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197484. eCollection 2018.
9
A mixed methods study to evaluate the effects of a teamwork enhancement and quality improvement initiative on nurses' work environment.一项混合方法研究,评估一项团队合作增强和质量改进计划对护士工作环境的影响。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Feb;76(2):664-675. doi: 10.1111/jan.14270. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
10
Conditions for production of interdisciplinary teamwork outcomes in oncology teams: protocol for a realist evaluation.跨学科团队协作在肿瘤学团队中产生成果的条件:一项实际评估的方案。
Implement Sci. 2014 Jun 17;9:76. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-76.

引用本文的文献

1
Provision of prostate cancer services in Tanzania: perspectives from five tertiary hospitals.坦桑尼亚前列腺癌服务提供情况:五所三级医院的观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):1154. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11580-1.
2
Building resilience in oncology teams: Protocol for a realist evaluation of multiple cases.在肿瘤学团队中建立适应力:多案例的现实主义评估方案。
PLoS One. 2022 May 12;17(5):e0268393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268393. eCollection 2022.
3
Clinical Audit of the Radiotherapy Process in Rectal Cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines and Quality Certification Do Not Avert Variability in Clinical Practice.

本文引用的文献

1
Australian breast cancer specialists' involvement in multidisciplinary treatment planning meetings.澳大利亚乳腺癌专家参与多学科治疗计划会议。
Breast. 2008 Aug;17(4):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2008.03.001. Epub 2008 May 1.
2
Wage losses in the year after breast cancer: extent and determinants among Canadian women.乳腺癌确诊后一年的工资损失:加拿大女性的情况及影响因素
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Mar 5;100(5):321-32. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn028. Epub 2008 Feb 26.
3
Implementing an interdisciplinary governance model in a comprehensive cancer center.
直肠癌放射治疗过程的临床审计:临床实践指南和质量认证无法避免临床实践中的变异性。
Transl Oncol. 2018 Jun;11(3):794-799. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
4
Optimizing clinical and organizational practice in cancer survivor transitions between specialized oncology and primary care teams: a realist evaluation of multiple case studies.优化癌症幸存者在专科肿瘤团队和初级保健团队之间过渡的临床及组织实践:多案例研究的现实主义评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 16;17(1):834. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2785-z.
5
Interdisciplinary eHealth Practice in Cancer Care: A Review of the Literature.癌症护理中的跨学科电子健康实践:文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 25;14(11):1289. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111289.
6
Effects of interdisciplinary teamwork on patient-reported experience of cancer care.跨学科团队合作对患者报告的癌症护理体验的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 20;17(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2166-7.
7
Understanding cancer networks better to implement them more effectively: a mixed methods multi-case study.更好地理解癌症网络以更有效地实施它们:一项混合方法多案例研究。
Implement Sci. 2016 Mar 21;11:39. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0404-8.
8
Preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a comparative study of quality control adherence at two cancer hospitals in Spain and Poland.术前放疗直肠癌:西班牙和波兰两所癌症医院质量控制依从性的比较研究。
Radiol Oncol. 2014 Apr 25;48(2):210-8. doi: 10.2478/raon-2014-0008. eCollection 2014 Jun.
9
Conditions for production of interdisciplinary teamwork outcomes in oncology teams: protocol for a realist evaluation.跨学科团队协作在肿瘤学团队中产生成果的条件:一项实际评估的方案。
Implement Sci. 2014 Jun 17;9:76. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-76.
在综合性癌症中心实施跨学科治理模式。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007 May;34(3):611-6. doi: 10.1188/07.ONF.611-616.
4
The multidisciplinary meeting: An indispensable aid to communication between different specialities.多学科会议:不同专业之间沟通不可或缺的助力。
Eur J Cancer. 2006 Oct;42(15):2459-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.03.034. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
5
Factors that influence cancer patients' overall perceptions of the quality of care.影响癌症患者对医疗质量总体认知的因素。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Aug;18(4):266-74. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzl014. Epub 2006 Jun 29.
6
What do we know about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature.我们对医疗团队的有效性了解多少?文献综述。
Med Care Res Rev. 2006 Jun;63(3):263-300. doi: 10.1177/1077558706287003.
7
Team performance and risk-adjusted health outcomes in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE).老年人全面护理计划(PACE)中的团队绩效与风险调整后的健康结果。
Gerontologist. 2006 Apr;46(2):227-37. doi: 10.1093/geront/46.2.227.
8
A guide to knowledge translation theory.知识转化理论指南。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):25-36. doi: 10.1002/chp.48.
9
Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?迷失在知识转化之中:是不是该有一张路线图了?
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):13-24. doi: 10.1002/chp.47.
10
Translation in the health professions: converting science into action.卫生专业领域的翻译:将科学转化为行动。
Eval Health Prof. 2006 Mar;29(1):7-32. doi: 10.1177/0163278705284441.