Division of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Transpl Immunol. 2011 Jul;25(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2011.05.007. Epub 2011 May 23.
Pre-transplant (Tx) presence of HLA antibodies (HLA-Ab) especially donor specific antibodies (DSA) has been correlated with post-Tx rejection. While crossmatch (XM) is the specific method to identify DSA, logistical reasons prevent performing a prospective XM in all transplants. In such cases DSA as identified by solid-phase assay (SPA) are being used to perform a virtual crossmatch (VXM). We present two cases, a heart-lung transplant and a kidney transplant, for which testing detected a presumptive DSA with discordant results: a negative flow cytometric crossmatch (FXM) and a positive VXM using SPA. The subsequent investigation determined the antibody, in both cases, was presumably directed against an epitope of a HLA-B44 antigen found on the single antigen beads (SAB) used in the SPA but not against the native form on the donor lymphocytes used in the FXM. Manufacturing of SAB beads results in denaturation of epitopes, majority of which are removed from the final product, but residual amount is present on the final product. Denaturation of majority of antigen epitopes on single antigen beads did not remove the activity of the recipient's antibodies but it did diminish the activity of positive control serum. This indicates denaturation of some of the HLA-B44 antigen during manufacturing of the SAB may have lead to the reactivity. Antibody mediated rejection does not appear to be associated with the titer of this antibody to denatured antigen in the first case and so clinical relevance of such antibodies is unclear. Subsequently a second case of discordant FXM and VXM was identified in a potential kidney transplant patient who went on to an uneventful transplant. In this case, lymphocytes from the donor were positively shown to express HLA-B44:02 using known anti- HLA-B44:02 control serum. Platelets identified as HLA-B44:02 could adsorb the anti-HLA-B44:02 from the control serum activity but not from that of the recipient's anti- HLA-B 44 antibody adding evidence that this antibody should best be classified as a false positive finding. The presence of such an antibody if misidentified may result in unnecessary therapy being instituted or the inappropriate denial of an organ for transplantation.
移植前(Tx)存在 HLA 抗体(HLA-Ab),特别是供体特异性抗体(DSA),与 Tx 后排斥反应相关。虽然交叉配型(XM)是识别 DSA 的特定方法,但由于物流原因,无法在所有移植中进行前瞻性 XM。在这种情况下,固相测定法(SPA)识别的 DSA 用于进行虚拟交叉配型(VXM)。我们介绍了两个案例,一个是心肺移植,一个是肾移植,检测到的抗体具有假定的 DSA,结果不一致:流式细胞交叉配型(FXM)阴性,SPA 阳性 VXM。随后的调查确定,在这两种情况下,抗体可能针对 SPA 中使用的单抗原珠(SAB)上发现的 HLA-B44 抗原的表位,但不针对 FXM 中使用的供体淋巴细胞上的天然形式。SAB 珠的制造导致表位的变性,大部分表位从最终产品中去除,但最终产品中仍存在残留量。单抗原珠上大多数抗原表位的变性并未去除受体抗体的活性,但确实降低了阳性对照血清的活性。这表明在 SAB 的制造过程中,一些 HLA-B44 抗原发生了变性,从而导致了反应性。在第一个案例中,抗体介导的排斥反应似乎与这种针对变性抗原的抗体滴度无关,因此这种抗体的临床相关性尚不清楚。随后,在一位潜在的肾移植患者中发现了第二个 FXM 和 VXM 不一致的案例,该患者随后进行了无并发症的移植。在这种情况下,使用已知的抗-HLA-B44:02 对照血清,证明供体的淋巴细胞阳性表达 HLA-B44:02。鉴定为 HLA-B44:02 的血小板可以吸附对照血清中的抗-HLA-B44:02 活性,但不能吸附受者抗-HLA-B44 抗体的活性,这进一步证明该抗体最好被归类为假阳性发现。如果错误识别此类抗体,可能会导致不必要的治疗或不恰当地拒绝移植器官。