• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动静脉移植物感染:大腿和上肢移植物的比较。

Arteriovenous graft infection: a comparison of thigh and upper extremity grafts.

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.

出版信息

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Jul;6(7):1739-43. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00490111. Epub 2011 Jun 3.

DOI:10.2215/CJN.00490111
PMID:21642365
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There are a limited number of publications on the features of arteriovenous graft infection in hemodialysis patients. The authors compared the clinical presentation, complications, and outcomes of infections of thigh and upper extremity grafts.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The authors queried a prospective access database at a large university medical center and identified 132 patients with graft infections (40 in the thigh and 92 in the upper extremity) requiring surgical excision. The authors collected information regarding the microbiology, complications, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The two graft groups were similar in age, gender, race, and frequency of diabetes. The median age of infected grafts was 162 days for thigh grafts versus 168 days for upper extremity grafts (P = 0.35). Thigh graft infections were more likely than upper extremity graft infections to be caused by a Gram-negative rod (31% versus 4%; P = 0.003), and more likely to result in a metastatic infection (15% versus 3%; P = 0.02). The duration of hospitalization associated with graft infection was similar (10.8 ± 5.4 versus 8.7 ± 6.3 days; P = 0.09). Finally, median catheter dependence was longer after thigh graft than upper arm graft infections (319 versus 237 days; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with upper extremity graft infections, thigh graft infections requiring excision are more likely to be caused by Gram-negative bacteria and to result in serious metastatic complications. These differences may require different empiric antibiotics and a higher index of suspicion for infection in hemodialysis patients with thigh grafts.

摘要

背景与目的

关于血液透析患者动静脉移植物感染的特征,仅有少数出版物对此进行了报道。作者比较了大腿和上肢移植物感染的临床表现、并发症和结局。

设计、设置、参与者和测量方法:作者查询了一家大型大学医学中心的前瞻性血管通路数据库,并确定了 132 例需要手术切除的移植物感染患者(大腿 40 例,上肢 92 例)。作者收集了有关微生物学、并发症和临床结局的信息。

结果

两组移植物患者在年龄、性别、种族和糖尿病发病率方面相似。大腿移植物感染的中位年龄为 162 天,上肢移植物感染的中位年龄为 168 天(P = 0.35)。与上肢移植物感染相比,大腿移植物感染更可能由革兰氏阴性杆菌引起(31%对 4%;P = 0.003),更可能导致转移性感染(15%对 3%;P = 0.02)。与移植物感染相关的住院时间相似(10.8 ± 5.4 天对 8.7 ± 6.3 天;P = 0.09)。最后,大腿移植物感染后导管依赖时间中位数长于上肢臂移植物感染(319 天对 237 天;P = 0.04)。

结论

与上肢移植物感染相比,需要切除的大腿移植物感染更可能由革兰氏阴性菌引起,并导致严重的转移性并发症。这些差异可能需要不同的经验性抗生素,以及对大腿移植物血液透析患者的感染保持更高的警惕性。

相似文献

1
Arteriovenous graft infection: a comparison of thigh and upper extremity grafts.动静脉移植物感染:大腿和上肢移植物的比较。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Jul;6(7):1739-43. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00490111. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
2
Infection of hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts.血液透析动静脉移植物感染。
J Vasc Access. 2010 Apr-Jun;11(2):155-8. doi: 10.1177/112972981001100213.
3
A comparison of patency and interventions in thigh versus Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow grafts for chronic hemodialysis vascular access.大腿部血管通路与用于慢性血液透析血管通路的血液透析可靠流出道移植物的通畅率及干预措施比较
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Nov;64(5):1392-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.055. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
4
Long-term outcomes of arteriovenous thigh grafts in hemodialysis patients: a comparison with tunneled dialysis catheters.血液透析患者动静脉股部移植物的长期结局:与隧道透析导管的比较。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 May;8(5):804-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09240912. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
5
Thigh grafts contribute significantly to patients' time on dialysis.大腿移植物显著延长了患者的透析时间。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Jul;5(7):1229-34. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08561109. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
6
Comparison of arteriovenous grafts in the thigh and upper extremities in hemodialysis patients.血液透析患者大腿与上肢动静脉移植物的比较。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003 Nov;14(11):2942-7. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000090746.88608.94.
7
Removal of infected arteriovenous grafts is morbid and many patients do not receive a new access within 1 year.受感染的动静脉移植物需要手术切除,且许多患者在 1 年内无法建立新的通路。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;70(1):193-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.067. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
8
Surgical excision of infected arteriovenous grafts: technique and review.感染性动静脉移植物的手术切除:技术与综述
J Vasc Access. 2009 Jul-Sep;10(3):148-52. doi: 10.1177/112972980901000302.
9
Complete versus partial excision of infected arteriovenous grafts: Does remnant graft material impact outcomes?受感染动静脉移植物的完全切除与部分切除:残留移植物材料是否会影响结果?
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;71(1):174-179. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.03.062. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
10
Total Resection of Infected Peripheral Hemodialysis Grafts Has a Favorable Impact on Outcomes.彻底切除感染的外周血液透析移植物对预后有积极影响。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;71:200-207. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.07.027. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Six-year outcomes of a phase II study of human-tissue engineered blood vessels for peripheral arterial bypass.一项关于用于外周动脉搭桥的人体组织工程血管的II期研究的六年结果。
JVS Vasc Sci. 2022 Dec 1;4:100092. doi: 10.1016/j.jvssci.2022.11.001. eCollection 2023.
2
Femoral Arteriovenous Grafts for Hemodialysis: Retrospective Comparison With Upper Extremity Grafts and Fistulas.用于血液透析的股动静脉移植物:与上肢移植物和动静脉内瘘的回顾性比较
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2017 Jul 25;4:2054358117719747. doi: 10.1177/2054358117719747. eCollection 2017.
3
Successful Use of Arteriovenous Graft for Hemodialysis Access After Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement.
左心室辅助装置植入术后动静脉移植物成功用于血液透析通路
Kidney Med. 2021 Aug 27;3(6):1091-1094. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2021.07.004. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
4
The Clinical and Economic Effect of Vascular Access Selection in Patients Initiating Hemodialysis with a Catheter.导管置入开始血液透析患者血管通路选择的临床及经济效果
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Dec;28(12):3679-3687. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016060707. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
5
Long Term Outcomes of Arteriovenous Grafts for Hemodialysis in Lower Extremities.下肢动静脉内瘘用于血液透析的长期疗效
Vasc Specialist Int. 2016 Dec;32(4):180-185. doi: 10.5758/vsi.2016.32.4.180. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
6
A Rare Case of Fatal Endocarditis and Sepsis Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Patient with Chronic Renal Failure.一例慢性肾衰竭患者由铜绿假单胞菌引起的致命性心内膜炎和脓毒症罕见病例。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):OD12-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20220.8175. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
7
Prosthetic Arteriovenous Graft Contact Dermatitis Masquerading as an Arteriovenous Graft Infection in a Hemodialysis Patient.人工动静脉移植物接触性皮炎伪装成血液透析患者的动静脉移植物感染
J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2016 Jul 8;4(3):2324709616658311. doi: 10.1177/2324709616658311. eCollection 2016 Jul-Sep.
8
Immediate access arteriovenous grafts versus tunnelled central venous catheters: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.直接动静脉移植物与隧道式中心静脉导管的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Feb 8;16:42. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0556-x.
9
Long-term outcomes of arteriovenous thigh grafts in hemodialysis patients: a comparison with tunneled dialysis catheters.血液透析患者动静脉股部移植物的长期结局:与隧道透析导管的比较。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 May;8(5):804-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09240912. Epub 2013 Jan 31.