• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新审视性别偏见:胸痛差异化管理的新见解。

Gender bias revisited: new insights on the differential management of chest pain.

机构信息

Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, University of Marburg, 35032 Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Jun 6;12:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-45.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-12-45
PMID:21645336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3125218/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chest pain is a common complaint and reason for consultation in primary care. Few data exist from a primary care setting whether male patients are treated differently than female patients. We examined whether there are gender differences in general physicians' (GPs) initial assessment and subsequent management of patients with chest pain, and how these differences can be explained

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study with 1212 consecutive chest pain patients. The study was conducted in 74 primary care offices in Germany from October 2005 to July 2006. After a follow up period of 6 months, an independent interdisciplinary reference panel reviewed clinical data of every patient and decided about the etiology of chest pain at the time of patient recruitment (delayed type-reference standard). We adjusted gender differences of six process indicators for different models.

RESULTS

GPs tended to assume that CHD is the cause of chest pain more often in male patients and referred more men for an exercise test (women 4.1%, men 7.3%, p = 0.02) and to the hospital (women 2.9%, men 6.6%, p < 0.01). These differences remained when adjusting for age and cardiac risk factors but ceased to exist after adjusting for the typicality of chest pain.

CONCLUSIONS

While observed gender differences can not be explained by differences in age, CHD prevalence, and underlying risk factors, the less typical symptom presentation in women might be an underlying factor. However this does not seem to result in suboptimal management in women but rather in overuse of services for men. We consider our conclusions rather hypothesis generating and larger studies will be necessary to prove our proposed model.

摘要

背景

胸痛是常见的主诉和初级保健咨询的原因。在初级保健环境中,很少有数据表明男性患者的治疗方法是否与女性患者不同。我们研究了全科医生(GP)对胸痛患者的初始评估和后续管理中是否存在性别差异,以及这些差异如何解释。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,共纳入了 1212 例连续胸痛患者。该研究于 2005 年 10 月至 2006 年 7 月在德国的 74 个初级保健办公室进行。在 6 个月的随访期后,一个独立的跨学科参考小组审查了每位患者的临床数据,并根据患者招募时(延迟型参考标准)的病因决定胸痛的病因。我们为六个过程指标调整了性别差异的不同模型。

结果

GP 倾向于认为 CHD 是男性胸痛患者的主要病因,并将更多的男性患者转介进行运动试验(女性 4.1%,男性 7.3%,p = 0.02)和住院(女性 2.9%,男性 6.6%,p < 0.01)。在调整年龄和心脏危险因素后,这些差异仍然存在,但在调整胸痛典型性后,这些差异就不存在了。

结论

虽然观察到的性别差异不能用年龄、CHD 患病率和潜在危险因素的差异来解释,但女性胸痛症状不典型可能是一个潜在因素。然而,这似乎并没有导致女性的管理不当,而是导致男性过度使用服务。我们认为我们的结论只是一个假设,需要进行更大规模的研究来证明我们提出的模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7466/3125218/9093833f3fb8/1471-2296-12-45-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7466/3125218/9093833f3fb8/1471-2296-12-45-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7466/3125218/9093833f3fb8/1471-2296-12-45-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender bias revisited: new insights on the differential management of chest pain.重新审视性别偏见:胸痛差异化管理的新见解。
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Jun 6;12:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-45.
2
Gender differences in presentation and diagnosis of chest pain in primary care.性别差异对初级保健中心胸痛的表现和诊断的影响。
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Dec 14;10:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-79.
3
Sex/gender bias in the management of chest pain in ambulatory care.门诊护理中胸痛管理的性别偏见
Womens Health (Lond). 2018 Jan-Dec;14:1745506518805641. doi: 10.1177/1745506518805641.
4
Sex differences in clinical presentation, management and outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain.胸痛急诊科患者的临床表现、治疗和结局的性别差异。
CJEM. 2010 Sep;12(5):405-13. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500012550.
5
Chest pain in primary care: is the localization of pain diagnostically helpful in the critical evaluation of patients?--A cross sectional study.基层医疗中的胸痛:疼痛定位在对患者的关键评估中具有诊断意义吗?——一项横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Oct 18;14:154. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-154.
6
Accuracy of general practitioners' assessment of chest pain patients for coronary heart disease in primary care: cross-sectional study with follow-up.全科医生在初级保健中对胸痛患者冠心病评估的准确性:一项有随访的横断面研究。
Croat Med J. 2010 Jun;51(3):243-9. doi: 10.3325//cmj.2010.51.243.
7
Chest pain in primary care: epidemiology and pre-work-up probabilities.基层医疗中的胸痛:流行病学和初步检查概率。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2009;15(3):141-6. doi: 10.3109/13814780903329528.
8
Multivariate modeling to identify patterns in clinical data: the example of chest pain.多变量建模分析临床数据中的模式:以胸痛为例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Nov 22;11:155. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-155.
9
Women and men with coronary heart disease in three countries: are they treated differently?三个国家中患有冠心病的女性和男性:他们接受的治疗有差异吗?
Womens Health Issues. 2008 May-Jun;18(3):191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.01.003.
10
The diagnosis of coronary heart disease in a low-prevalence setting: follow-up data from patients whose CHD was misdiagnosed by their family doctors.低患病率环境下的冠心病诊断:家庭医生误诊的冠心病患者的随访数据。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Jul;108(26):445-51. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0445. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of referral for suspected coronary artery disease: a qualitative study based on decision thresholds.疑似冠心病转诊的决定因素:基于决策阈值的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 May 2;24(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02064-y.
2
[High patient unawareness for chronic kidney disease even in later stages - but why is it more frequent in women than in men?].[即使在慢性肾病后期患者的知晓率仍很低——但为何女性比男性更常见?]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2022 Sep;147(17):e70-e81. doi: 10.1055/a-1819-0870. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
3
Independent medical evaluation of general practitioners' follow-up of sick-listed patients: a cross-sectional study in Norway.

本文引用的文献

1
Ruling out coronary artery disease in primary care: development and validation of a simple prediction rule.基层医疗中心排除冠状动脉疾病:简单预测规则的制定与验证。
CMAJ. 2010 Sep 7;182(12):1295-300. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100212. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
2
Accuracy of symptoms and signs for coronary heart disease assessed in primary care.症状和体征在初级保健中评估冠心病的准确性。
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Jun;60(575):e246-57. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X502137.
3
Gender differences in presentation and diagnosis of chest pain in primary care.性别差异对初级保健中心胸痛的表现和诊断的影响。
对全科医生病假患者随访情况进行独立医学评估:挪威的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 18;10(3):e032776. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032776.
4
Are there gender disparities in symptom presentation or triage of patients with chest discomfort at primary care out-of-hours services? An observational study.在初级保健非工作时间服务中,胸痛患者的症状表现或分诊是否存在性别差异?一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 19;9(11):e031613. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031613.
5
Sex/gender bias in the management of chest pain in ambulatory care.门诊护理中胸痛管理的性别偏见
Womens Health (Lond). 2018 Jan-Dec;14:1745506518805641. doi: 10.1177/1745506518805641.
6
Managing chest pain patients in general practice: an interview-based study.全科医疗中胸痛患者的管理:一项基于访谈的研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jun 2;19(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0771-0.
7
Access to rehabilitation: patient perceptions of inequalities in access to specialty pain rehabilitation from a gender and intersectional perspective.康复服务的可及性:从性别和交叉性视角看患者对获得专科疼痛康复服务不平等现象的认知。
Glob Health Action. 2016 Aug 26;9:31542. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.31542. eCollection 2016.
8
Developing a Tool for Increasing the Awareness about Gendered and Intersectional Processes in the Clinical Assessment of Patients--A Study of Pain Rehabilitation.开发一种提高对患者临床评估中性别化和交叉性过程认识的工具——一项关于疼痛康复的研究
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 7;11(4):e0152735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152735. eCollection 2016.
9
Use of exercise tests in primary care: importance for referral decisions and possible bias in the decision process; a prospective observational study.基层医疗中运动测试的应用:对转诊决策的重要性及决策过程中可能存在的偏倚;一项前瞻性观察性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Nov 30;15:182. doi: 10.1186/s12875-014-0182-9.
10
Primary health care use from the perspective of gender and morbidity burden.从性别和发病负担角度看初级卫生保健的利用情况
BMC Womens Health. 2014 Nov 30;14:145. doi: 10.1186/s12905-014-0145-2.
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Dec 14;10:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-79.
4
Sex differences in use of interventional cardiology persist after risk adjustment.在进行风险调整后,介入心脏病学使用方面的性别差异依然存在。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Mar;63(3):203-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.077537. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
5
Women and non-cardiac chest pain: gender differences in symptom presentation.女性与非心源性胸痛:症状表现的性别差异
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2008 Sep;11(4):287-93. doi: 10.1007/s00737-008-0021-x. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
6
Gender differences in the management and prognosis of myocardial infarction among patients > or = 65 years of age.65岁及以上心肌梗死患者管理与预后的性别差异。
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jun 1;101(11):1531-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.033. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
7
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee.《2008年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会统计委员会及中风统计小组委员会报告》
Circulation. 2008 Jan 29;117(4):e25-146. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187998. Epub 2007 Dec 17.
8
Chest wall syndrome among primary care patients: a cohort study.基层医疗患者的胸壁综合征:一项队列研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Sep 12;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-51.
9
Gender differences in the clinical management of patients with angina pectoris: a cross-sectional survey in primary care.心绞痛患者临床管理中的性别差异:一项初级保健中的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Sep 4;7:142. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-142.
10
Gender bias in cardiovascular testing persists after adjustment for presenting characteristics and cardiac risk.在对就诊特征和心脏风险进行调整后,心血管检查中的性别偏见依然存在。
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Jul;14(7):599-605. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.03.1355. Epub 2007 May 30.