• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ruling out coronary artery disease in primary care: development and validation of a simple prediction rule.基层医疗中心排除冠状动脉疾病:简单预测规则的制定与验证。
CMAJ. 2010 Sep 7;182(12):1295-300. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100212. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
2
Ruling out coronary heart disease in primary care patients with chest pain: a clinical prediction score.在基层医疗机构中,利用临床预测评分排除胸痛患者的冠心病。
BMC Med. 2010 Jan 21;8:9. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-9.
3
Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for chest wall syndrome in primary care.开发和验证基层医疗中胸壁综合征的临床预测规则。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Aug 6;13:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-74.
4
Pooled individual patient data from five countries were used to derive a clinical prediction rule for coronary artery disease in primary care.来自五个国家的个体患者汇总数据被用于推导基层医疗中冠心病的临床预测规则。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jan;81:120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
5
Ruling out coronary heart disease in primary care: external validation of a clinical prediction rule.基层医疗中心排除冠心病:临床预测规则的外部验证。
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Jun;62(599):e415-21. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X649106.
6
'Chest pain typicality' in suspected acute coronary syndromes and the impact of clinical experience.疑似急性冠状动脉综合征中的“胸痛典型性”及临床经验的影响
Am J Med. 2015 Oct;128(10):1109-1116.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
7
Prospective validation of a modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.前瞻性验证改良的心肌梗死溶栓治疗风险评分在急诊科胸痛且可能为急性冠脉综合征患者中的应用。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):368-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00696.x.
8
External validation and extension of a diagnostic model for obstructive coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional predictive evaluation in 4888 patients of the Austrian Coronary Artery disease Risk Determination In Innsbruck by diaGnostic ANgiography (CARDIIGAN) cohort.一项阻塞性冠状动脉疾病诊断模型的外部验证和扩展:奥地利因斯布鲁克通过诊断性血管造影(CARDIIGAN)队列对 4888 例患者进行的横断面预测性评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 7;7(4):e014467. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014467.
9
Performance of risk scores for coronary artery disease: a retrospective cohort study of patients with chest pain in urgent primary care.风险评分在冠心病中的表现:一项在紧急初级保健中胸痛患者的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 8;11(12):e045387. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045387.
10
Prospective derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.复发性艰难梭菌感染临床预测规则的前瞻性推导与验证
Gastroenterology. 2009 Apr;136(4):1206-14. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.038. Epub 2008 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Efficacy of the Marburg Heart Score to Triage Patients Presenting With Chest Pain in an Emergency Department: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.评估马尔堡心脏评分在急诊科对胸痛患者进行分诊的疗效:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究。
Emerg Med Int. 2025 May 20;2025:6085679. doi: 10.1155/emmi/6085679. eCollection 2025.
2
Are dizziness/lightheadedness helpful symptoms for telephone triage of females and males calling the out-of-hours service for acute chest discomfort? A cross-sectional study.头晕/眩晕对于拨打非工作时间服务热线咨询急性胸痛的女性和男性进行电话分诊来说,是有帮助的症状吗?一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 5;15(2):e092368. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092368.
3
Chest Pain in Women: Gender- and Sex-based Differences in the Presentation and Diagnosis of Heart Disease.女性胸痛:心脏病表现与诊断中基于性别和性别的差异
US Cardiol. 2023 Nov 28;17:e19. doi: 10.15420/usc.2022.30. eCollection 2023.
4
Chest Pain in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of Risk Stratification Tools to Rule Out Acute Coronary Syndrome.基层医疗中的胸痛:排除急性冠状动脉综合征的风险分层工具的系统评价。
Ann Fam Med. 2024 Sep-Oct;22(5):426-436. doi: 10.1370/afm.3141.
5
Telephone triage of chest pain in out-of-hours primary care: external validation of a symptom-based prediction rule to rule out acute coronary syndromes.非工作时间初级保健中心胸痛的电话分诊:基于症状的预测规则排除急性冠脉综合征的外部验证。
Fam Pract. 2024 Oct 8;41(5):832-840. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmae028.
6
The LEADING Guideline: Reporting Standards for Expert Panel, Best-Estimate Diagnosis, and Longitudinal Expert All Data (LEAD) Studies.《LEADING指南:专家小组、最佳估计诊断和纵向专家全数据(LEAD)研究的报告标准》
medRxiv. 2024 Sep 4:2024.03.19.24304526. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.19.24304526.
7
Development and implementation of a treatment pathway to reduce coronary angiograms - lessons from a failure.制定和实施减少冠状动脉造影的治疗路径 - 从失败中吸取的教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10904-5.
8
AI Algorithm to Predict Acute Coronary Syndrome in Prehospital Cardiac Care: Retrospective Cohort Study.用于预测院前心脏护理中急性冠状动脉综合征的人工智能算法:回顾性队列研究。
JMIR Cardio. 2023 Oct 31;7:e51375. doi: 10.2196/51375.
9
Induced myocardial ischemia in candidates to liver transplantation without evidence of heart disease.在没有心脏病证据的情况下,对肝移植候选者进行诱导性心肌缺血。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):2237521. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2237521.
10
Predictors of critical illness among young males with chest pain, abdominal pain, or headaches in the Republic of Korea Army.韩国陆军中出现胸痛、腹痛或头痛的年轻男性重症疾病预测因素。
Encephalitis. 2022 Jul;2(3):73-82. doi: 10.47936/encephalitis.2021.00185. Epub 2022 Mar 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Ruling out coronary heart disease in primary care patients with chest pain: a clinical prediction score.在基层医疗机构中,利用临床预测评分排除胸痛患者的冠心病。
BMC Med. 2010 Jan 21;8:9. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-9.
2
Chest pain in the emergency department: incidence, clinical characteristics and risk stratification.急诊科胸痛:发病率、临床特征及风险分层
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008 Sep;61(9):953-9.
3
Chest pain in daily practice: occurrence, causes and management.日常临床中的胸痛:发生率、病因及管理
Swiss Med Wkly. 2008 Jun 14;138(23-24):340-7. doi: 10.4414/smw.2008.12123.
4
Identifying phases of investigation helps planning, appraising, and applying the results of explanatory prognosis studies.明确研究阶段有助于规划、评估和应用解释性预后研究的结果。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;61(6):552-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.08.005. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
5
Signs and symptoms in diagnosing acute myocardial infarction and acute coronary syndrome: a diagnostic meta-analysis.诊断急性心肌梗死和急性冠状动脉综合征的体征与症状:一项诊断性荟萃分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Feb;58(547):105-11. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X277014.
6
Different from what the textbooks say: how GPs diagnose coronary heart disease.与教科书所述不同:全科医生如何诊断冠心病。
Fam Pract. 2007 Dec;24(6):622-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmm053. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
7
Chest wall syndrome among primary care patients: a cohort study.基层医疗患者的胸壁综合征:一项队列研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Sep 12;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-51.
8
[The German Program for Disease Management Guidelines: CHD Guideline 2006. Short review].[德国疾病管理指南项目:2006年冠心病指南。简要综述]
Med Klin (Munich). 2006 Dec 15;101(12):993-8. doi: 10.1007/s00063-006-1130-9.
9
Triage and diagnosis of chest pain in rural hospitals: implementation of the ACI-TIPI in the High Plains Research Network.农村医院胸痛的分诊与诊断:高平原研究网络中急性冠状动脉缺血性胸痛分诊指数(ACI-TIPI)的实施
Ann Fam Med. 2006 Mar-Apr;4(2):153-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.403.
10
Chest pain in general practice: incidence, comorbidity and mortality.全科医疗中的胸痛:发病率、合并症及死亡率。
Fam Pract. 2006 Apr;23(2):167-74. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi124. Epub 2006 Feb 3.

基层医疗中心排除冠状动脉疾病:简单预测规则的制定与验证。

Ruling out coronary artery disease in primary care: development and validation of a simple prediction rule.

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, University of Marburg, D-35032 Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

CMAJ. 2010 Sep 7;182(12):1295-300. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100212. Epub 2010 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1503/cmaj.100212
PMID:20603345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2934794/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chest pain can be caused by various conditions, with life-threatening cardiac disease being of greatest concern. Prediction scores to rule out coronary artery disease have been developed for use in emergency settings. We developed and validated a simple prediction rule for use in primary care.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional diagnostic study in 74 primary care practices in Germany. Primary care physicians recruited all consecutive patients who presented with chest pain (n = 1249) and recorded symptoms and findings for each patient (derivation cohort). An independent expert panel reviewed follow-up data obtained at six weeks and six months on symptoms, investigations, hospital admissions and medications to determine the presence or absence of coronary artery disease. Adjusted odds ratios of relevant variables were used to develop a prediction rule. We calculated measures of diagnostic accuracy for different cut-off values for the prediction scores using data derived from another prospective primary care study (validation cohort).

RESULTS

The prediction rule contained five determinants (age/sex, known vascular disease, patient assumes pain is of cardiac origin, pain is worse during exercise, and pain is not reproducible by palpation), with the score ranging from 0 to 5 points. The area under the curve (receiver operating characteristic curve) was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-0.91) for the derivation cohort and 0.90 (95% CI 0.87-0.93) for the validation cohort. The best overall discrimination was with a cut-off value of 3 (positive result 3-5 points; negative result <or= 2 points), which had a sensitivity of 87.1% (95% CI 79.9%-94.2%) and a specificity of 80.8% (77.6%-83.9%).

INTERPRETATION

The prediction rule for coronary artery disease in primary care proved to be robust in the validation cohort. It can help to rule out coronary artery disease in patients presenting with chest pain in primary care.

摘要

背景

胸痛可由多种情况引起,其中危及生命的心脏疾病最为令人担忧。已经开发出预测评分来排除冠状动脉疾病,以便在急诊环境中使用。我们开发并验证了一种简单的预测规则,用于初级保健。

方法

我们在德国的 74 家初级保健诊所进行了一项横断面诊断研究。初级保健医生招募了所有因胸痛就诊的连续患者(n=1249),并为每位患者记录了症状和发现(推导队列)。一个独立的专家小组审查了在六周和六个月时获得的关于症状、检查、住院和药物治疗的随访数据,以确定是否存在冠状动脉疾病。使用相关变量的调整比值比来开发预测规则。我们使用来自另一项前瞻性初级保健研究的数据(验证队列)来计算不同预测评分截断值的诊断准确性测量值。

结果

预测规则包含五个决定因素(年龄/性别、已知血管疾病、患者认为疼痛来自心脏、疼痛在运动时加重、疼痛不能通过触诊再现),评分范围为 0 至 5 分。推导队列的曲线下面积(接收者操作特征曲线)为 0.87(95%置信区间 [CI] 0.83-0.91),验证队列为 0.90(95% CI 0.87-0.93)。最佳总体区分度是使用 3 分的截断值(阳性结果 3-5 分;阴性结果<或=2 分),其敏感性为 87.1%(95% CI 79.9%-94.2%),特异性为 80.8%(77.6%-83.9%)。

解释

初级保健中用于冠状动脉疾病的预测规则在验证队列中表现稳健。它可以帮助排除在初级保健中因胸痛就诊的患者的冠状动脉疾病。