• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸腰椎骨折的载荷分担分类的组内和组间一致性。

Inter- and intraobserver agreement on the Load Sharing Classification of thoracolumbar spine fractures.

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Injury. 2012 Apr;43(4):416-22. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2011.05.013
PMID:21645896
Abstract

The Load Sharing Classification (LSC) allocates one to three points to each of three different radiological characteristics of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures: the vertebral body involved in the fracture, the displacement of the fracture parts and the kyphotic deformity. Added up, a minimal score of three and a maximal score of nine can be obtained. When the LSC score is three to six, a short segment pedicle screw fixation suffices. When the LSC score is seven to nine, a high rate of failure in patients with a short segment pedicle screw fixation exists. In these cases an anterior stabilising procedure of the spine is advised. The LSC has been examined by Dai and Jin, who claim an almost perfect inter- and intraobserver agreement, according to the Landis and Koch criteria. Dai and Jin only present results for the separate three items of the LSC and for the total LSC scores. Observer agreement for the two LSC score categories (three to six and seven to nine) have not been studied. The aim of this study is to study the inter- and intraobserver agreement of the LSC for the total score, the three separate items and also for the two LSC score categories. Three observers determine twice the LSC scores of forty traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. The average standard Cohen's kappa values for the separate LSC items range between 0.06 and 0.48. For the total LSC score the average standard Cohen's kappa and weighted kappa values are 0.22 and 0.67 respectively. For the two LSC score categories, there is unanimous agreement in 55% of the cases and a majority agreement in 40%. In the remaining 5% of the fractures there is a split decision. Standard Cohen's kappa value for the two LSC score categories is 0.53. The standard Cohen's kappa values can be rated as fair to moderate. From these data it can be concluded that the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the Load Sharing Classification of Spinal fractures can be rated as fair.

摘要

负荷分担分类(LSC)将创伤性胸腰椎骨折的三个不同放射学特征中的每一个分配一到三分:骨折涉及的椎体、骨折部位的移位和后凸畸形。最小得分为 3 分,最大得分为 9 分。当 LSC 评分为 3 至 6 分时,短节段椎弓根螺钉固定就足够了。当 LSC 评分为 7 至 9 分时,短节段椎弓根螺钉固定的患者失败率很高。在这些情况下,建议采用脊柱前路稳定术。Dai 和 Jin 已经对 LSC 进行了检查,根据 Landis 和 Koch 标准,他们声称具有近乎完美的观察者间和观察者内一致性。Dai 和 Jin 仅展示了 LSC 三个单独项目和总 LSC 评分的结果。尚未研究观察者对 LSC 两个评分类别的一致性(3 至 6 和 7 至 9)。本研究旨在研究 LSC 总分、三个单独项目以及两个 LSC 评分类别的观察者间和观察者内一致性。三位观察者两次确定 40 例创伤性胸腰椎骨折的 LSC 评分。单独 LSC 项目的平均标准 Cohen's kappa 值在 0.06 至 0.48 之间。对于总 LSC 评分,平均标准 Cohen's kappa 和加权 kappa 值分别为 0.22 和 0.67。对于两个 LSC 评分类别,在 55%的病例中存在一致意见,在 40%的病例中存在多数意见。在其余 5%的骨折中存在分歧决定。两个 LSC 评分类别的标准 Cohen's kappa 值为 0.53。标准 Cohen's kappa 值可评为公平至中度。从这些数据可以得出结论,脊柱骨折负荷分担分类的观察者间和观察者内可靠性可评为公平。

相似文献

1
Inter- and intraobserver agreement on the Load Sharing Classification of thoracolumbar spine fractures.胸腰椎骨折的载荷分担分类的组内和组间一致性。
Injury. 2012 Apr;43(4):416-22. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
2
Reliability and Agreement of Different Spine Fracture Classification Systems: An Independent Intraobserver and Interobserver Study.不同脊柱骨折分类系统的可靠性与一致性:一项独立的观察者内和观察者间研究
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;115:e695-e702. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.138. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
3
Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the load sharing classification of the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.胸腰椎爆裂骨折评估中负荷分担分类的观察者间及观察者内信度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Feb 1;30(3):354-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152095.85927.24.
4
The complement of the load-sharing classification for the thoracolumbar injury classification system in managing thoracolumbar burst fractures.胸腰椎损伤分类系统中负载分担分类在处理胸腰椎爆裂骨折方面的补充内容。
J Orthop Sci. 2013 Jan;18(1):81-6. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0319-4. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
5
[Reliability of load-sharing classification in indications for anterior vertebral body replacement in thoracolumbar spine fractures].[胸腰椎脊柱骨折前路椎体置换适应症中负荷分担分类的可靠性]
Rozhl Chir. 2010 Apr;89(4):223-8.
6
An independent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility evaluation of the new AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.新型AOSpine胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类系统的独立观察者间可靠性及观察者内可重复性评估
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jan 1;40(1):E54-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000656.
7
Reliability of smartphone-based teleradiology for evaluating thoracolumbar spine fractures.基于智能手机的远程放射学评估胸腰椎骨折的可靠性。
Spine J. 2017 Feb;17(2):161-167. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.08.021. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
8
Assessment of two thoracolumbar fracture classification systems as used by multiple surgeons.多位外科医生使用的两种胸腰椎骨折分类系统的评估
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jul;87(7):1423-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01530.
9
MRI reliability in classifying thoracolumbar fractures according to AO classification.根据AO分类法对胸腰椎骨折进行分类时MRI的可靠性
Orthopedics. 2013 Jan;36(1):e75-8. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20121217-22.
10
Reliability of the thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score and comparison with the denis classification for injury to the thoracic and lumbar spine.胸腰椎损伤分类与严重程度评分的可靠性及其与胸腰椎损伤 Denis 分类的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Dec 15;37(26):2161-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182601469.

引用本文的文献

1
Thoracic and lumbar spine trauma classification systems fail to predict post-traumatic kyphotic deformity.胸腰椎创伤分类系统无法预测创伤后驼背畸形。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2022 Jun 16;11:100134. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100134. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Back to the future in traumatic fracture shapes of lumbar spine: An analysis of risk of kyphosis after conservative treatment.腰椎创伤性骨折形态的“回到未来”:保守治疗后脊柱后凸风险分析
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):38-43. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_189_20. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
3
Posterior short segment pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture.
后路短节段椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰椎骨折。
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Apr 7;35:102. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.35.102.21540. eCollection 2020.
4
Treatment of Fractures of the Thoracolumbar Spine: Recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU).胸腰椎骨折的治疗:德国骨科学与创伤学会(DGOU)脊柱分会的建议
Global Spine J. 2018 Sep;8(2 Suppl):34S-45S. doi: 10.1177/2192568218771668. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
5
[Posterior short-segment fixation including the fractured vertebra for severe unstable thoracolumbar fractures].[包括骨折椎体的后路短节段固定治疗严重不稳定型胸腰椎骨折]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jan 15;32(1):59-63. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201708082.
6
Thoracoscopic anterior stabilization for thoracolumbar fractures in patients without spinal cord injury: quality of life and long-term results.无脊髓损伤患者胸腰椎骨折的胸腔镜前路固定:生活质量及长期结果
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jul;27(7):1593-1603. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5571-7. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
7
Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Salter-Harris classification of physeal injuries.骨骺损伤的Salter-Harris分类的观察者间和观察者内可靠性。
Hippokratia. 2016 Jul-Sep;20(3):222-226.
8
Minimal Invasive Circumferential Management of Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures.胸腰椎骨折的微创环形治疗
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:639542. doi: 10.1155/2015/639542. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
9
The retrospective analysis of posterior short-segment pedicle instrumentation without fusion for thoracolumbar burst fracture with neurological deficit.对伴有神经功能缺损的胸腰椎爆裂骨折行后路短节段椎弓根内固定不融合术的回顾性分析。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Mar 2;2014:457634. doi: 10.1155/2014/457634. eCollection 2014.