Kings College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Section of Eating Disorders, London, UK.
Psychiatry Res. 2011 Aug 15;188(3):396-401. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.04.022. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
It has been proposed that approach and avoidance processes may be critically involved in the development and maintenance of eating disorders (EDs), including anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN). The Behavioural Inhibition System and Behavioural Activation System Scales (BIS/BAS) and Appetitive Motivation Scale (AMS) questionnaires were administered to 286 participants: 91 healthy controls (HCs), 121 participants with a current ED, either AN (restrictive and binge purge subtypes), or BN and 74 participants recovered from an ED. Individuals with EDs had higher levels of sensitivity to punishment and lower levels of reward reactivity than controls. Individuals in recovery from an ED scored the same as those in the acute group, with the exception of BAS fun seeking, for which they scored significantly higher than those with restricting AN. Discriminant analysis revealed that HCs were maximally separated from those in the acute and recovered ED groups along a dimension reflecting high punishment sensitivity and low reward sensitivity. Classification analysis demonstrated that ED and HC group membership was predicted from reward and punishment sensitivity measures; however recovered participants tended to be misclassified as ED. This study suggests high punishment sensitivity and low reward reactivity/sensitivity might form a personality cluster associated with the risk of developing an ED.
有人提出,趋近和回避过程可能在进食障碍(ED)的发展和维持中起着至关重要的作用,包括神经性厌食症(AN)和神经性贪食症(BN)。本研究对 286 名参与者进行了行为抑制系统和行为激活系统量表(BIS/BAS)和食欲动机量表(AMS)的测试:91 名健康对照者(HCs),121 名患有 ED 的参与者,包括 AN(限制型和暴食清除型)或 BN,以及 74 名从 ED 中恢复的参与者。ED 患者比对照组对惩罚更敏感,对奖励的反应性更低。ED 恢复期患者的评分与急性组相同,除了 BAS 寻求刺激,ED 恢复期患者的评分明显高于限制型 AN 患者。判别分析显示,HCs 与急性和 ED 恢复期患者最大程度地沿着反映高惩罚敏感性和低奖励敏感性的维度分离。分类分析表明,ED 和 HC 组的成员身份可以通过奖励和惩罚敏感性测量来预测;然而,恢复组的参与者往往被错误分类为 ED。本研究表明,高惩罚敏感性和低奖励反应性/敏感性可能形成与 ED 风险相关的人格集群。