Abber Sophie R, Murray Susan M, Brown Carina S, Wierenga Christina E
Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Eating Disorders Center for Treatment and Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Mar;57(3):671-681. doi: 10.1002/eat.24156. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
Reward and punishment sensitivity are known to be altered in anorexia nervosa (AN). Most research has examined these constructs separately although motivated behavior is influenced by considering both the potential for reward and risk of punishment. The present study sought to compare the relative balance of reward and punishment sensitivity in AN versus healthy controls (HCs) and examine whether motivational bias is associated with AN symptoms and treatment outcomes.
Adolescents and adults with AN (n = 262) in a partial hospitalization program completed the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System (BIS/BAS) scales, and Sensitivity to Punishment/Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) at admission and discharge. HCs (HC; n = 90) completed the BIS/BAS and SPSRQ. Motivational Bias Scores were calculated to reflect the dominance of reward versus punishment sensitivity.
Individuals with AN demonstrated significantly greater bias toward punishment sensitivity than HC. In AN, a bias toward punishment was associated with higher EDE-Q Global score at admission. Change in motivational bias during treatment predicted EDE-Q Global scores, but not BMI, at discharge, with greater increases in reward sensitivity or greater decreases in punishment sensitivity during treatment predicting lower eating pathology. Similar findings were observed using the BIS/BAS and SPSRQ.
Change in motivational bias during treatment is associated with improved outcomes in AN. However, it appears that much of the change in motivational bias can be attributed to changes in punishment sensitivity, rather than reward sensitivity. Future research should examine the mechanisms underlying punishment sensitivity decreases during treatment.
Sensitivity to reward and punishment may be important treatment targets for individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN). To date, most research has considered reward and punishment sensitivity separately, rather than examining their relationship to each other. We found that the balance of reward and punishment sensitivity (i.e., motivational bias) differs between healthy controls and those with AN and that this bias is associated with eating disorder symptoms and treatment outcome.
众所周知,神经性厌食症(AN)患者的奖惩敏感性会发生改变。尽管动机行为受到奖励可能性和惩罚风险两者的影响,但大多数研究都是分别考察这些构念。本研究旨在比较AN患者与健康对照者(HCs)在奖惩敏感性方面的相对平衡,并检验动机偏差是否与AN症状及治疗结果相关。
参加部分住院治疗项目的青少年及成年AN患者(n = 262)在入院和出院时完成了饮食失调检查问卷(EDE-Q)、行为抑制系统/行为激活系统(BIS/BAS)量表以及惩罚敏感性/奖励敏感性问卷(SPSRQ)。HCs(n = 90)完成了BIS/BAS和SPSRQ。计算动机偏差分数以反映奖励敏感性与惩罚敏感性的优势程度。
AN患者表现出比HCs对惩罚敏感性的偏差显著更大。在AN患者中,对惩罚的偏差与入院时更高的EDE-Q总体得分相关。治疗期间动机偏差的变化可预测出院时的EDE-Q总体得分,但不能预测体重指数(BMI),治疗期间奖励敏感性增加越多或惩罚敏感性降低越多,预示着饮食病理学症状越低。使用BIS/BAS和SPSRQ观察到了类似的结果。
治疗期间动机偏差的变化与AN患者治疗结果的改善相关。然而,动机偏差的大部分变化似乎可归因于惩罚敏感性的变化,而非奖励敏感性的变化。未来研究应考察治疗期间惩罚敏感性降低的潜在机制。
奖惩敏感性可能是神经性厌食症(AN)患者重要的治疗靶点。迄今为止,大多数研究都是分别考虑奖励和惩罚敏感性,而非考察它们之间的关系。我们发现,健康对照者与AN患者在奖励和惩罚敏感性的平衡(即动机偏差)方面存在差异,且这种偏差与饮食失调症状及治疗结果相关。