• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

父母为中心的发育筛查率:差异及其与服务获取的关系。

Rates of parent-centered developmental screening: disparities and links to services access.

机构信息

Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 707 SW Gaines Ave, Mailcode CDRC-P, Portland, OR 97219, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2011 Jul;128(1):146-55. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0424. Epub 2011 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2010-0424
PMID:21646266
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2006, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended developmental screening of young children with a standardized screening tool as a routine component of well-child care.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the national and state prevalence of standardized, parent-completed developmental screening (DS-PC) in the previous 12 months and evaluate associations between screening and receipt of an early-intervention plan or mental health services for children at higher risk.

METHODS

Data from the 2007 National Survey of Children's Health were used. Nested t tests were used to compare each state to national prevalence. Logistic and multilevel regression models evaluated variations and associations with DS-PC.

RESULTS

Nationally, 19.5% of children received a DS-PC in the previous 12 months, although the figure varied from 10.7% to 47% across the United States. Prevalence did not rise above 26.7% for any socioeconomic subgroup of children and was highest for younger, black, and publicly insured children and lowest for uninsured children and children with gaps in insurance coverage. Equally high-risk children varied twofold in their probability of receiving early intervention or needed mental health services according to whether they had received a DS-PC.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant gap between the developmental screening that is recommended and what is reported nationally. When children are not screened consistently, opportunities for early identification, intervention, and treatment may be delayed. Gaps in screening and wide variations across states present considerable opportunities for cross-state learning to improve quality on this critical component of preventive pediatric care. Measurement systems for assessing prevalence and impact of screening require continued evaluation and development.

摘要

背景

2006 年,美国儿科学会建议对幼儿进行标准化筛查,将其作为常规儿童保健的一部分。

目的

评估全美和各州在过去 12 个月内使用标准化、家长完成的发育筛查(DS-PC)的情况,并评估筛查与为高风险儿童提供早期干预计划或心理健康服务之间的关系。

方法

使用 2007 年全国儿童健康调查的数据。嵌套 t 检验用于比较每个州与全国的流行率。逻辑和多层次回归模型评估了 DS-PC 的变化和关联。

结果

全国范围内,19.5%的儿童在过去 12 个月内接受了 DS-PC,尽管美国各地的这一数字从 10.7%到 47%不等。任何儿童社会经济亚组的流行率都没有超过 26.7%,而年龄较小、黑人、公共保险的儿童的流行率最高,没有保险的儿童和保险覆盖有缺口的儿童的流行率最低。同样高风险的儿童,根据他们是否接受过 DS-PC,接受早期干预或需要心理健康服务的可能性相差两倍。

结论

建议的发育筛查与全国报告的情况之间存在显著差距。当儿童不能持续接受筛查时,早期发现、干预和治疗的机会可能会延迟。筛查方面的差距和各州之间的广泛差异为改善预防儿科保健这一关键组成部分的跨州学习提供了巨大机会。评估筛查的流行率和影响的测量系统需要不断评估和发展。

相似文献

1
Rates of parent-centered developmental screening: disparities and links to services access.父母为中心的发育筛查率:差异及其与服务获取的关系。
Pediatrics. 2011 Jul;128(1):146-55. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0424. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
2
Disparities in the use of preventive health care among children with disabilities in Taiwan.台湾地区残疾儿童预防保健服务利用的差异。
Res Dev Disabil. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):324-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.09.020. Epub 2011 Nov 26.
3
Geographic disparities in access to the medical home among US CSHCN.美国儿童和青少年 CSHCN 获得医疗之家机会的地理差异。
Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124 Suppl 4:S352-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1255E.
4
Racial and ethnic disparities in medical and dental health, access to care, and use of services in US children.美国儿童在医疗和口腔健康、医疗服务可及性以及服务利用方面的种族和族裔差异。
Pediatrics. 2008 Feb;121(2):e286-98. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1243. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
5
Developmental screening: is there enough time?发育筛查:时间是否充足?
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2009 Jul;48(6):648-55. doi: 10.1177/0009922809334350. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
6
Measuring the quality of preventive and developmental services for young children: national estimates and patterns of clinicians' performance.衡量幼儿预防和发展服务的质量:全国估计数及临床医生的表现模式。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6 Suppl):1973-83.
7
Access to the medical home: results of the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs.获得医疗之家服务:全国特殊医疗需求儿童调查结果
Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5 Suppl):1485-92.
8
Assessing development in the pediatric office.在儿科诊所评估发育情况。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6 Suppl):1926-33.
9
Ethnic and Indigenous access to early childhood healthcare services in Australia: parents' perceived unmet needs and related barriers.澳大利亚族裔和原住民获得儿童早期保健服务的机会:家长感知到的未满足需求和相关障碍。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011 Feb;35(1):30-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00633.x. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
10
Comparison of systematic developmental surveillance with standardized developmental screening in primary care.基层医疗中系统发育监测与标准化发育筛查的比较
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2012 Feb;51(2):154-9. doi: 10.1177/0009922811420711. Epub 2011 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A cohort of Ontario physicians' knowledge regarding autism spectrum disorder: a mixed methods study.安大略省医生关于自闭症谱系障碍的知识队列研究:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Dev Disabil. 2022 Dec 19;70(5):915-924. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2022.2149101. eCollection 2024.
2
"Everyone screens to some extent": Barriers and facilitators of developmental screening among children with sickle cell disease: A mixed methods study.“每个人都在一定程度上进行筛查”:镰状细胞病患儿发育筛查的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2024 Aug;71(8):e31060. doi: 10.1002/pbc.31060. Epub 2024 May 17.
3
Scaling Family Voices and Engagement to Measure and Improve Systems Performance and Whole Child Health: Progress and Lessons from the Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative.
扩大家庭声音与参与度以衡量和改善系统绩效及儿童整体健康:儿童与青少年健康测量倡议的进展与经验教训
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Aug 25. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03755-9.
4
Implementation of a community health worker-focused team-based model of care: What modifications do clinics make?实施以社区卫生工作者为核心的团队式护理模式:诊所会做出哪些调整?
Front Health Serv. 2023 Jan 30;3:989157. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.989157. eCollection 2023.
5
Developmental Monitoring and Referral for Low-Income Children Served by WIC: Program Development and Implementation Outcomes.发展监测和转介服务:WIC 服务低收入儿童的项目开发和实施成果。
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Feb;26(2):230-241. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03319-9. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
6
A Parent Coach-Led Model of Well-Child Care for Young Children in Low-Income Communities: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.低收入社区幼儿的家长指导式健康儿童照护模式:一项整群随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Nov 25;10(11):e27054. doi: 10.2196/27054.
7
An Ecological Model to Frame the Delivery of Pediatric Preventive Care.一个生态模型,用于构建儿科预防保健服务。
Pediatrics. 2021 Jul;148(Suppl 1):s13-s20. doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-050693D.
8
Evolving Roles for Health Care in Supporting Healthy Child Development.医疗保健在支持儿童健康发展中不断演变的角色。
Future Child. 2020 Fall;30(2):143-164.
9
Improving autism and developmental screening and referral in US primary care practices serving Latinos.在美国为拉丁裔提供服务的初级医疗实践中改善自闭症和发育筛查及转诊工作。
Autism. 2021 Jan;25(1):288-299. doi: 10.1177/1362361320957461. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
10
Healthcare access and adverse family impact among U.S. children ages 0-5 years by prematurity status.美国 0-5 岁早产儿的医疗保健可及性及其对家庭的不良影响。
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Apr 17;20(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02058-0.