el Deeb M, Templeton B, Holmes R E, Edmund R
Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Minnesota School of Dentistry, Minneapolis 55455.
Cleft Palate J. 1990 Jul;27(3):230-9; discussion 239-40. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569(1990)027<0230:fawpan>2.3.co;2.
Using an extra-oral approach, subperiosteal pockets were created bilaterally over zygomatic and mandibular areas in six Rhesus monkeys. One side of each anatomic site received a Proplast I implant and the contralateral a nonporous hydroxylapatite (NPHA) block. Two animals were killed postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months, and the implants retrieved en bloc for histologic evaluation. Clinical evaluation showed the Proplast implants more stable than NPHA implants. Histologic evaluation for Proplast implants demonstrated complete encapsulation, fibrous tissue infiltration, fragmentation of implants, and some giant cell reaction. The NPHA implants were completely encapsulated with fibrous tissues, and no giant cell response, fragmentation, biodegradation, or bone formation was observed. We concluded that the Proplast was more stable than NPHA implants, but the NPHA produced less inflammatory cell and giant cell reaction.
采用口外入路,在6只恒河猴双侧的颧骨和下颌骨区域制作骨膜下袋。每个解剖部位的一侧植入I型普罗普拉斯(Proplast),对侧植入无孔羟基磷灰石(NPHA)块。术后3个月、6个月和12个月分别处死2只动物,将植入物整块取出进行组织学评估。临床评估显示普罗普拉斯植入物比NPHA植入物更稳定。普罗普拉斯植入物的组织学评估显示有完全包囊、纤维组织浸润、植入物破碎以及一些巨细胞反应。NPHA植入物被纤维组织完全包囊,未观察到巨细胞反应、破碎、生物降解或骨形成。我们得出结论,普罗普拉斯比NPHA植入物更稳定,但NPHA产生的炎性细胞和巨细胞反应更少。