Westfall R L, Homsy C A, Kent J N
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1982 Dec;40(12):771-5. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(82)90172-0.
Comparison of tissue ingrowth density values for Proplast I and its aluminum oxide analog, Proplast II, when implanted on the primate infraorbital rim and inferior border of the mandible, showed no difference between the two test materials. A similar comparison of local cellular response ratings showed slightly less response to Proplast II. Microscopic and clinical examination did not otherwise reveal any significant differences in biologic reaction to these materials.
当将Proplast I及其氧化铝类似物Proplast II植入灵长类动物眶下缘和下颌骨下缘时，对两者组织长入密度值的比较显示，两种测试材料之间没有差异。对局部细胞反应等级的类似比较显示，对Proplast II的反应略小。显微镜检查和临床检查未发现对这些材料的生物学反应有任何其他显著差异。
