• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

述评:残疾评估——评估者是否有能力?

Commentary: Disability evaluations--are the evaluators able?

机构信息

University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(2):194-6.

PMID:21653263
Abstract

Disability assessments of patients are among the most common nontherapeutic evaluations requested of treating psychiatrists. Yet, there has been relatively little empirical analysis of how psychiatrists approach these evaluations in real clinical practice. Treating psychiatrists, those both with and without forensic expertise, struggle with the challenge of dual agency and overlapping therapeutic and forensic roles. Making the different roles clear to the patient can allow for more therapeutic exploration and alliance around further treatment goals, expectations, and interventions. Given the high prevalence of psychiatric disability and requested evaluations, psychiatric trainees would benefit from formal teaching, and it should be considered an important area for psychiatric continuing education.

摘要

对患者的残疾评估是治疗精神科医生最常要求进行的非治疗性评估之一。然而,对于精神科医生在实际临床实践中如何进行这些评估,几乎没有进行过相对较少的实证分析。具有和不具有法医专业知识的治疗精神科医生都在努力应对双重代理以及治疗和法医角色重叠的挑战。向患者明确不同的角色,可以允许对进一步的治疗目标、期望和干预措施进行更多的治疗探索和联盟。鉴于精神残疾的高患病率和评估请求,精神科培训生将受益于正式教学,并且应该将其视为精神科继续教育的重要领域。

相似文献

1
Commentary: Disability evaluations--are the evaluators able?述评:残疾评估——评估者是否有能力?
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(2):194-6.
2
Evaluating psychiatric disability: differences by forensic expertise.评估精神残疾:法医专业知识的差异。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(2):183-8.
3
Commentary: Challenges in providing psychiatric disability evaluations.述评:提供精神残疾评估的挑战。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(2):189-93.
4
Dual agency and ethics conflicts in correctional practice: sources and solutions.矫正实践中的双重代理和道德冲突:来源与解决办法。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2013;41(1):72-8.
5
Forensic psychiatric evaluations: an overview of methods, ethical issues, and criminal and civil assessments.法医精神病学评估:方法、伦理问题以及刑事和民事评估概述
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2015 May;27(2):109-15. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2015-5001.
6
Forensic and medical legal issues in addiction psychiatry.成瘾精神病学中的法医和法医学问题。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2004 Dec;27(4):611-26. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2004.06.001.
7
[Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility for schizophrenic persons accused of murder: Study with experts of the Court of Appeal of Aix-en-Provence].[对被控谋杀的精神分裂症患者责任认定中精神病学专业知识的差异:与普罗旺斯地区艾克斯上诉法院专家的研究]
Encephale. 2016 Aug;42(4):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
8
Psychiatric employment evaluations and theHealth Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1878-82. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1878.
9
Forensic child and adolescent psychiatry: from field experiences to education standards.法医儿童与青少年精神病学:从实地经验到教育标准
J Forensic Leg Med. 2014 Jan;21:17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
10
AAPL guideline for forensic evaluation of psychiatric disabilities: a disability law perspective.美国苹果心理学会精神病残疾法医评估指南:从残疾法角度看
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008;36(4):558-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation and Management of Mental Health Disability in Post-secondary Students.高等教育阶段学生心理健康障碍的评估与管理。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Apr 30;21(6):43. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1024-1.