School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Mol Cancer Ther. 2011 Aug;10(8):1419-29. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-1057. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
Peloruside A and laulimalide are potent microtubule-stabilizing natural products with a mechanism of action similar to that of paclitaxel. However, the binding site of peloruside A and laulimalide on tubulin remains poorly understood. Drug resistance in anticancer treatment is a serious problem. We developed peloruside A- and laulimalide-resistant cell lines by selecting 1A9 human ovarian carcinoma cells that were able to grow in the presence of one of these agents. The 1A9-laulimalide resistant cells (L4) were 39-fold resistant to the selecting agent and 39-fold cross-resistant to peloruside A, whereas the 1A9-peloruside A resistant cells (R1) were 6-fold resistant to the selecting agent while they remained sensitive to laulimalide. Neither cell line showed resistance to paclitaxel or other drugs that bind to the taxoid site on β-tubulin nor was there resistance to microtubule-destabilizing drugs. The resistant cells exhibited impaired peloruside A/laulimalide-induced tubulin polymerization and impaired mitotic arrest. Tubulin mutations were found in the βI-tubulin isotype, R306H or R306C for L4 and A296T for R1 cells. This is the first cell-based evidence to support a β-tubulin-binding site for peloruside A and laulimalide. To determine whether the different resistance phenotypes of the cells were attributable to any other tubulin alterations, the β-tubulin isotype composition of the cells was examined. Increased expression of βII- and βIII-tubulin was observed in L4 cells only. These results provide insight into how alterations in tubulin lead to unique resistance profiles for two drugs, peloruside A and laulimalide, that have a similar mode of action.
佩罗利昔德 A 和劳拉昔米德是两种有效的微管稳定剂,其作用机制与紫杉醇相似。然而,佩罗利昔德 A 和劳拉昔米德在微管蛋白上的结合位点仍知之甚少。癌症治疗中的耐药性是一个严重的问题。我们通过选择能够在这些药物之一存在的情况下生长的 1A9 人卵巢癌细胞,开发了对佩罗利昔德 A 和劳拉昔米德具有耐药性的细胞系。1A9-劳拉昔米德耐药细胞(L4)对选择剂的耐药性为 39 倍,对佩罗利昔德 A 的交叉耐药性为 39 倍,而 1A9-佩罗利昔德 A 耐药细胞(R1)对选择剂的耐药性为 6 倍,而对劳拉昔米德仍敏感。这两个细胞系均未对与β-微管蛋白 taxoid 位点结合的紫杉醇或其他药物产生耐药性,也未对微管蛋白破坏药物产生耐药性。耐药细胞表现出佩罗利昔德 A/劳拉昔米德诱导的微管蛋白聚合受损和有丝分裂阻滞受损。在βI-微管蛋白同工型中发现了突变,L4 细胞为 R306H 或 R306C,R1 细胞为 A296T。这是第一个基于细胞的证据,支持佩罗利昔德 A 和劳拉昔米德的β-微管蛋白结合位点。为了确定细胞的不同耐药表型是否归因于任何其他微管蛋白改变,检查了细胞的β-微管蛋白同工型组成。仅在 L4 细胞中观察到βII-和βIII-微管蛋白的表达增加。这些结果深入了解了微管蛋白的改变如何导致两种药物(佩罗利昔德 A 和劳拉昔米德)具有相似作用机制的独特耐药谱。