Réanimation Médicale, AP-HP, Centre Hospitalier Albert Chenevier-Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
Intensive Care Med. 2011 Aug;37(8):1269-76. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2249-6. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV) is a high-frequency ventilation modality that can be superimposed on spontaneous breathing. IPV may diminish respiratory muscle loading and help to mobilize secretions. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the short-term effects of IPV in patients at high risk for extubation failure who were receiving preventive non-invasive ventilation (NIV) after extubation.
Respiratory rate, work of breathing, and gas exchange were evaluated in 17 extubated patients during 20 min of IPV and 20 min of NIV delivered via a facial mask, separated by periods of spontaneous breathing. The pressure-support level during NIV was adjusted until tidal volume reached 6-8 ml/kg and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 4-5 cmH(2)O. For IPV, the pressurisation frequency was set at 250 cycles/min and driving pressure at 1.2 bar. The pressure-time product of the diaphragm (PTPdi/min) was measured using an oesophageal and gastric double-balloon catheter.
Transdiaphragmatic pressure and PTPdi/min improved significantly (p < 0.01), from a median [25th-75th percentiles] of 264 [190-300] to 192 [152-221] cmH(2)O s/min with IPV and from 273 [212-397] to 176 [120-216] cmH(2)O s/min with NIV. Respiratory rate decreased significantly from 23 [19-27] to 22 [17-24] breaths/min for IPV and from 25 [19-28] to 20 [18-22] breaths/min for NIV (p < 0.01). Mean PaCO(2) decreased after NIV (from 46 [42-48] to 41 [36-42] mmHg, p < 0.01) but not after IPV. There was no noticeable effect on oxygenation.
IPV is an interesting alternative to NIV in patients at risk for post-extubation respiratory failure. Both NIV and IPV diminished the respiratory rate and work of breathing, but IPV was less effective in improving alveolar ventilation.
肺内叩击通气(IPV)是一种高频通气方式,可以叠加在自主呼吸上。IPV 可以减轻呼吸肌负荷,帮助清除分泌物。本前瞻性研究的目的是评估在接受拔管后预防性无创通气(NIV)的高拔管失败风险患者中,IPV 的短期效果。
17 例拔管患者在 20 分钟 IPV 和 20 分钟 NIV 期间评估呼吸频率、呼吸功和气体交换,NIV 通过面罩输送,期间有自主呼吸期。NIV 时的压力支持水平调整为潮气量达到 6-8ml/kg,呼气末正压(PEEP)为 4-5cmH2O。对于 IPV,加压频率设置为 250 次/分钟,驱动压力为 1.2 巴。使用食管和胃双球囊导管测量膈的压力-时间乘积(PTPdi/min)。
膈的跨膈压和 PTPdi/min 显著改善(p<0.01),从 IPV 时的中位数[25 至 75 百分位数]264[190-300]至 192[152-221]cmH2O s/min,从 NIV 时的 273[212-397]至 176[120-216]cmH2O s/min。呼吸频率从 IPV 时的 23[19-27]次/分钟显著降低至 22[17-24]次/分钟,从 NIV 时的 25[19-28]次/分钟降低至 20[18-22]次/分钟(p<0.01)。NIV 后平均 PaCO2 降低(从 46[42-48]mmHg 降至 41[36-42]mmHg,p<0.01),但 IPV 后无明显变化。对氧合没有明显影响。
对于有拔管后呼吸衰竭风险的患者,IPV 是 NIV 的一种有趣的替代方法。NIV 和 IPV 均降低了呼吸频率和呼吸功,但 IPV 在改善肺泡通气方面效果较差。