Suppr超能文献

皮肤固定肩胛跟踪器:两种动态方法在一系列校准位置下的比较。

Skin-fixed scapula trackers: a comparison of two dynamic methods across a range of calibration positions.

机构信息

Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Biomech. 2011 Jul 7;44(10):2004-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Jun 11.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish the optimal methodology for skin-fixed measurement of the scapula during dynamic movement. This was achieved by comparing an optimally positioned Scapula Tracker device (ST) to a previously described palpation device, taken as the true measure of scapular kinematics. These measurements were compared across a range of calibration positions, including the use of multiple calibration positions for a single movement, in order to establish an optimal calibration approach. Ten subjects' scapular motion was measured using this ST and a previously described Acromial Method (AM). The two datasets were compared at a standard, an optimal and a 'multiple' calibration position, thus allowing a direct comparison between two common skin-fixed methods to track the bony kinematics of the scapula across different calibration positions. A comparison was also made with a bone-fixed technique from the literature. At both the standard and optimal calibration positions the ST was shown to be the more accurate measure of internal rotation and posterior tilt, particularly above 100° of humerothoracic elevation. The ST errors were found to be acceptable in relation to clinically important levels. Calibration positions have been shown to have a significant effect on the errors of both skin-fixed measurement techniques and therefore the importance of correct calibration is highlighted. It has thus been shown that a ST can be used to accurately quantify scapular motion when appropriately calibrated for the range of motion being measured.

摘要

本研究旨在建立一种在动态运动中对肩胛骨进行皮肤固定测量的最佳方法。通过将优化定位的肩胛骨跟踪器(Scapula Tracker,ST)与先前描述的触诊设备进行比较,从而实现这一目标,后者被视为肩胛骨运动学的真实测量方法。为了确定最佳校准方法,对各种校准位置(包括在单个运动中使用多个校准位置)进行了比较。本研究使用这种 ST 和先前描述的肩峰法(Acromial Method,AM)测量了 10 名受试者的肩胛骨运动。将两个数据集在标准、最佳和“多个”校准位置进行了比较,从而可以直接比较两种常见的皮肤固定方法,以在不同的校准位置上跟踪肩胛骨的骨骼运动。还与文献中的一种骨固定技术进行了比较。在标准和最佳校准位置,ST 被证明是内部旋转和后倾的更准确测量方法,特别是在肱骨胸廓抬高超过 100°时。ST 的误差被认为与临床重要水平相比是可以接受的。校准位置已被证明对两种皮肤固定测量技术的误差有显著影响,因此强调了正确校准的重要性。因此,已经证明,当针对所测量的运动范围进行适当校准时,ST 可以用于准确量化肩胛骨运动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验