Suppr超能文献

冠心病患者的抑郁筛查:对 AHA 指南的批判性评价。

Depression screening in patients with coronary heart disease: a critical evaluation of the AHA guidelines.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2011 Jul;71(1):6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.10.009. Epub 2010 Dec 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We lack evidence that routine screening for depression in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) improves patient outcome. This lack has challenged the advisory issued by the American Heart Association (AHA) to routinely screen for depression in CHD patients. We assess the AHA advisory in the context of well-established criteria of screening for diseases.

METHODS

Using principles and criteria for screening developed by the World Health Organization and the United Kingdom National Screening Committee, we generated criteria pertinent to screening for depression in CHD patients. To find publications relevant to these criteria and clinical setting, we performed a broadly based literature search on "depression and CHD," supplemented by more focused literature searches.

RESULTS

Evidence for an association between depression and CHD is strong. Despite this, the AHA advisory has several limitations. It did not account for the complexity of the association between depression and CHD. It acknowledged there was no evidence that screening for depression leads to improved outcomes in cardiovascular populations but still recommended routine screening without providing an alternative evidence-based explanation. It ignored the paucity of literature about the safety and cost-effectiveness of routine screening for depression in CHD and failed to define the nature and extent of resources needed to implement such a program effectively.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the AHA advisory is premature. We must first demonstrate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of screening and define the resources necessary for its implementation and monitoring. Meanwhile, organizations representing cardiologists, psychiatrists, and general practitioners must coordinate efforts to manage depression and CHD through collaborative care, and work with the policy makers to develop the necessary infrastructure and services delivery system needed to optimize the outcome of depressed and at-risk-for-depression patients suffering from CHD.

摘要

目的

我们缺乏证据表明对冠心病(CHD)患者进行常规抑郁筛查能改善患者预后。这一证据缺失对美国心脏协会(AHA)建议对 CHD 患者常规筛查抑郁提出了挑战。我们在疾病筛查既定标准的背景下评估 AHA 的建议。

方法

我们采用世界卫生组织和英国国家筛查委员会制定的筛查原则和标准,生成了与 CHD 患者抑郁筛查相关的标准。为寻找与这些标准和临床环境相关的出版物,我们广泛检索了“抑郁与 CHD”相关文献,同时进行了更有针对性的文献检索。

结果

抑郁与 CHD 之间存在关联的证据非常有力。尽管如此,AHA 的建议仍存在一些局限性。它没有考虑到抑郁与 CHD 之间关联的复杂性。它承认没有证据表明对抑郁进行筛查能改善心血管人群的预后,但仍建议常规筛查,而没有提供替代的基于证据的解释。它忽略了关于 CHD 中常规抑郁筛查的安全性和成本效益的文献匮乏,也没有定义有效实施此类计划所需的资源的性质和范围。

结论

我们认为 AHA 的建议尚不成熟。我们必须首先证明筛查的疗效、安全性和成本效益,并定义实施和监测所需的资源。同时,代表心脏病专家、精神科医生和全科医生的组织必须协调努力,通过协作式护理来管理抑郁和 CHD,并与政策制定者合作,制定必要的基础设施和服务提供系统,以优化患有 CHD 和有抑郁风险的抑郁患者的预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验