Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2011 Nov;89(11):3699-706. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3808. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
The effects of mineral-supplement delivery system on patterns of supplement use by grazing beef cows were measured in 2 studies. Study 1 was conducted on 4 pastures grazed by pregnant, mature beef cows (BW = 562 ± 38 kg) from February to May. Study 2 was conducted on 4 pastures grazed by lactating beef cows (BW = 579 ± 54 kg) and their calves from May to September. Treatments were mineral delivered in salt-based, granular form (salty) or mineral provided in a low-protein, cooked, molasses-based block (sweet); both were fed ad libitum. The salty supplement was supplied to cattle via a covered mineral feeder; the sweet supplement was supplied via an open-topped barrel. Both salty and sweet supplements were deployed in each pasture. No additional salt was supplied to cattle. Forage use in the vicinity of each supplement-deployment site and the frequency and duration of herd visits to each supplement-deployment site were measured during four 14-d periods during study 1 and seven 14-d periods during study 2. Supplements were moved to new locations within pastures at the beginning of each period. Consumption of the sweet supplement was greater than salty during each data-collection period in study 1; however, relative differences in consumption diminished over time (treatment × time, P = 0.03). In study 2, sweet consumption was greater than salty in periods 1, 6, and 7 but was not different from salty during periods 2, 3, 4, and 5 (treatment × time, P < 0.01). Increased consumption of the sweet supplement in study 1 translated to greater frequency of herd visits to supplement-deployment sites compared with the salty sites (2.82 vs. 2.47 herd visits/d; P = 0.02) and longer herd visits to supplement-deployment sites compared with the salty sites (125.7 vs. 54.9 min/herd visit; P < 0.01). The frequency of herd visits to mineral feeding sites in study 2 was similar (P > 0.10) between treatments for periods 1 through 6; however, herds visited the sweet sites more often than salty during period 7 (P < 0.01). Herd visits to the sweet sites were longer than those to the salty sites in study 2 (83.8 vs. 51.4 min/herd visit; P < 0.01). Forage disappearance within 100 m of supplement-deployment sites was not influenced (P ≥ 0.54) by treatment in either study. Results were interpreted to suggest that the sweet supplement influenced the location of grazing cattle more strongly than the salty supplement and may be more effective for luring cattle into specific areas of pasture during the winter, spring, and early fall but not during summer.
两项研究旨在测定矿物质补充剂输送系统对放牧肉牛补充剂使用模式的影响。研究 1 在 4 个牧场进行,这些牧场由妊娠和成熟的肉牛(体重为 562±38kg)放牧,时间为 2 月至 5 月。研究 2 在 4 个牧场进行,这些牧场由哺乳期肉牛(体重为 579±54kg)及其小牛放牧,时间为 5 月至 9 月。处理方式为以盐为基础的颗粒状矿物质(咸)或低蛋白、煮熟的、糖蜜为基础的块状矿物质(甜)补充剂自由喂养。咸补充剂通过带盖的矿物质喂食器提供给牛,甜补充剂通过开口桶提供。两种补充剂都在每个牧场中使用。牛没有额外补充盐分。在研究 1 的四个 14 天期间和研究 2 的七个 14 天期间,测量了每个补充剂放置地点附近的草料使用情况以及牛群对每个补充剂放置地点的访问频率和持续时间。在每个时期开始时,将补充剂移动到牧场的新位置。在研究 1 的每个数据收集期间,甜补充剂的消耗量均大于咸补充剂,但随着时间的推移,消耗量的相对差异减小(处理×时间,P=0.03)。在研究 2 中,在第 1、6 和 7 期,甜补充剂的消耗量大于咸补充剂,但在第 2、3、4 和 5 期,甜补充剂与咸补充剂没有差异(处理×时间,P<0.01)。在研究 1 中,甜补充剂的消耗量增加导致牛群更频繁地访问补充剂放置地点,与咸补充剂放置地点相比(2.82 次/d 与 2.47 次/d;P=0.02),并且在补充剂放置地点的停留时间更长(125.7min/次与 54.9min/次;P<0.01)。在研究 2 中,在第 1 至 6 期,牛群对矿物质喂养点的访问频率在处理之间相似(P>0.10);然而,在第 7 期,牛群更多地访问甜补充剂放置点,而不是咸补充剂放置点(P<0.01)。在研究 2 中,甜补充剂放置点的牛群访问时间长于咸补充剂放置点(83.8min/次与 51.4min/次;P<0.01)。在这两项研究中,补充剂放置地点附近 100m 内的草料消失均不受处理的影响(P≥0.54)。结果表明,与咸补充剂相比,甜补充剂更能影响放牧牛的位置,并且在冬季、春季和初秋期间,可能更有效地吸引牛进入牧场的特定区域,但在夏季则不然。