Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Feb;121(1):16-27. doi: 10.1037/a0023973. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
Little longitudinal research has examined progression to more severe bipolar disorders in individuals with "soft" bipolar spectrum conditions. We examine rates and predictors of progression to bipolar I and II diagnoses in a nonpatient sample of college-age participants (n = 201) with high General Behavior Inventory scores and childhood or adolescent onset of "soft" bipolar spectrum disorders followed longitudinally for 4.5 years from the Longitudinal Investigation of Bipolar Spectrum (LIBS) project. Of 57 individuals with initial cyclothymia or bipolar disorder not otherwise specified (BiNOS) diagnoses, 42.1% progressed to a bipolar II diagnosis and 10.5% progressed to a bipolar I diagnosis. Of 144 individuals with initial bipolar II diagnoses, 17.4% progressed to a bipolar I diagnosis. Consistent with hypotheses derived from the clinical literature and the Behavioral Approach System (BAS) model of bipolar disorder, and controlling for relevant variables (length of follow-up, initial depressive and hypomanic symptoms, treatment-seeking, and family history), high BAS sensitivity (especially BAS Fun Seeking) predicted a greater likelihood of progression to bipolar II disorder, whereas early age of onset and high impulsivity predicted a greater likelihood of progression to bipolar I (high BAS sensitivity and Fun-Seeking also predicted progression to bipolar I when family history was not controlled). The interaction of high BAS and high Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) sensitivities also predicted greater likelihood of progression to bipolar I. We discuss implications of the findings for the bipolar spectrum concept, the BAS model of bipolar disorder, and early intervention efforts.
很少有纵向研究考察了具有“软性”双相谱系特征的个体向更严重的双相障碍发展的情况。我们在一项非患者样本中检查了在双相谱系纵向研究(LIBS)项目中,具有高一般行为量表评分和儿童或青少年期“软性”双相谱系障碍的大学生参与者(n=201)中,进展为双相 I 型和 II 型诊断的比率和预测因素,随访时间为 4.5 年。在最初患有环性心境障碍或未特指的双相障碍(BiNOS)诊断的 57 人中,有 42.1%进展为双相 II 型诊断,10.5%进展为双相 I 型诊断。在最初患有双相 II 型诊断的 144 人中,有 17.4%进展为双相 I 型诊断。与临床文献和双相障碍的行为趋近系统(BAS)模型中得出的假设一致,并且控制了相关变量(随访时间、初始抑郁和轻躁狂症状、寻求治疗和家族史),高 BAS 敏感性(尤其是 BAS 寻求乐趣)预测更有可能进展为双相 II 型障碍,而发病年龄较早和冲动性较高则预测更有可能进展为双相 I 型(当不控制家族史时,高 BAS 敏感性和寻求乐趣也预测进展为双相 I 型)。高 BAS 和高行为抑制系统(BIS)敏感性的相互作用也预测了更有可能进展为双相 I 型。我们讨论了这些发现对双相谱概念、双相障碍的 BAS 模型以及早期干预努力的意义。