• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于非编码 trnL-trnF 叶绿体序列的兜兰属系统发育关系:大量重复区域的证据。

Phylogenetic relationships in Disa based on non-coding trnL-trnF chloroplast sequences: evidence of numerous repeat regions.

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa;

出版信息

Am J Bot. 2001 Nov;88(11):2088-100.

PMID:21669640
Abstract

Sequence data from the intron and spacer of the trnL-F chloroplast region elucidate the phylogenetic relationships of the tribe Diseae (Orchidoideae: Orchidaceae). Within Diseae, 41 species of Disa, two of Brownleea, three of Satyrium, and two of Corycium were included, with five species of Habenaria sensu lato (Orchideae) and one epidendroid as outgroups. The sequences revealed substitutions and considerable length variation, due mainly to the presence of repeat motifs. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony revealed five distinct clades. The branching order of the five weakly supported the paraphyly of Diseae, with the successive divergence of Brownleea, Corycium, Habenaria, Satyrium, and Disa. Within the monophyletic Disa, three main groupings appeared, two strongly supported clades representing sect. Racemosae and sect. Coryphaea and the third grouping containing several clades currently grouped into sections based on morphological phylogenies. Some discrepancies between the molecular phylogeny and the phylogeny based on morphological characters may require reevaluation of some of the morphological characters. The presence of different numbers of repeat motifs, both among different taxa and within taxa, indicates that these characters may be phylogenetically informative at the population level.

摘要

来自 trnL-F 叶绿体区内含子和间隔区的序列数据阐明了 Diseae(Orchidoideae:Orchidaceae)族的系统发育关系。在 Diseae 中,包括 41 种 Disa、2 种 Brownleea、3 种 Satyrium 和 2 种 Corycium,以及 5 种广义 Habenaria(Orchideae)和 1 种 Epidendroid 作为外群。序列揭示了替换和相当大的长度变异,主要是由于重复基序的存在。使用简约法进行的系统发育分析显示出五个不同的分支。五个分支的顺序较弱地支持 Diseae 的并系性,其中 Brownleea、Corycium、Habenaria、Satyrium 和 Disa 依次分化。在单系的 Disa 中,出现了三个主要的分组,两个强烈支持的分支代表 sect. Racemosae 和 sect. Coryphaea,第三个分组包含几个目前根据形态系统发育分组到各个节的分支。分子系统发育与基于形态特征的系统发育之间的一些差异可能需要重新评估一些形态特征。不同分类群之间以及同一分类群内重复基序数量的不同表明,这些特征在种群水平上可能具有系统发育信息。

相似文献

1
Phylogenetic relationships in Disa based on non-coding trnL-trnF chloroplast sequences: evidence of numerous repeat regions.基于非编码 trnL-trnF 叶绿体序列的兜兰属系统发育关系:大量重复区域的证据。
Am J Bot. 2001 Nov;88(11):2088-100.
2
Molecular phylogenetics of Diseae (Orchidaceae): a contribution from nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences.兰科植物的分子系统发育学:来自核糖体ITS序列的贡献
Am J Bot. 1999 Jun;86(6):887-99.
3
A molecular phylogeny for the large African orchid genus Disa.大型非洲兰花属兜兰属的分子系统发育研究。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Apr;43(1):75-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.08.014. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
4
Phylogenetic relationships among species of Hypochaeris (Asteraceae, Cichorieae) based on ITS, plastid trnL intron, trnL-F spacer, and matK sequences.基于 ITS、质体 trnL 内含子、trnL-F 间隔区和 matK 序列探讨 Hypochaeris 属(菊科,菊苣族)物种间的系统发育关系。
Am J Bot. 2003 Mar;90(3):496-507. doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.3.496.
5
Towards a more robust molecular phylogeny of Chinese Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: additional evidence from nrDNA ITS and cpDNA intron (rpl16 and rps16) sequences.构建更可靠的中国伞形科芹亚科分子系统发育树:来自nrDNA ITS和cpDNA内含子(rpl16和rps16)序列的更多证据
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Oct;53(1):56-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.05.029. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
6
Molecular phylogenetics of the family Cyprinidae (Actinopterygii: Cypriniformes) as evidenced by sequence variation in the first intron of S7 ribosomal protein-coding gene: further evidence from a nuclear gene of the systematic chaos in the family.鲤科(辐鳍鱼纲:鲤形目)的分子系统发育学:基于S7核糖体蛋白编码基因第一内含子序列变异的证据——来自该科系统混乱的一个核基因的进一步证据
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Mar;46(3):818-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Jun 16.
7
Phylogenetic relationships of Carpha and its relatives (Schoeneae, Cyperaceae) inferred from chloroplast trnL intron and trnL-trnF intergenic spacer sequences.基于叶绿体trnL内含子和trnL-trnF基因间隔区序列推断的卡尔费草属及其近缘属(莎草科刺子莞族)的系统发育关系。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 May;31(2):647-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.09.004.
8
Phylogenetic relationships in Taxodiaceae and Cupressaceae sensu stricto based on matK gene, chlL gene, trnL-trnF IGS region, and trnL intron sequences.基于 matK 基因、chlL 基因、trnL-trnF IGS 区和 trnL 内含子序列探讨柏科和柏科狭义分类群的系统发育关系。
Am J Bot. 2000 Oct;87(10):1480-8.
9
Phylogenetic relationships in subfamily Tillandsioideae (Bromeliaceae) based on DNA sequence data from seven plastid regions.基于来自七个质体区域的 DNA 序列数据的凤梨科铁兰亚科(凤梨科)的系统发育关系。
Am J Bot. 2005 Feb;92(2):337-51. doi: 10.3732/ajb.92.2.337.
10
A phylogenetic analysis of the Orchidaceae: evidence from rbcL nucleotide.兰科植物的系统发育分析:rbcL 核苷酸证据。
Am J Bot. 1999 Feb;86(2):208-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic diversity and relationship between cultivated, weedy and wild rye species as revealed by chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA non-coding regions analysis.叶绿体和线粒体非编码区分析揭示栽培、杂草和野生黑麦物种的遗传多样性和关系。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0213023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213023. eCollection 2019.
2
Unidentifiable by morphology: DNA barcoding of plant material in local markets in Iran.形态学无法鉴定:伊朗当地市场植物材料的DNA条形码分析
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 18;12(4):e0175722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175722. eCollection 2017.
3
Phylogeny and classification of the East Asian Amitostigma alliance (Orchidaceae: Orchideae) based on six DNA markers.
基于六个DNA标记的东亚无柱兰类群(兰科:红门兰亚科)的系统发育与分类
BMC Evol Biol. 2015 May 26;15:96. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0376-3.
4
The evolution of floral nectaries in Disa (Orchidaceae: Disinae): recapitulation or diversifying innovation?迪莎属(兰科:迪兰族)花部蜜腺的演化:重演还是多样化创新?
Ann Bot. 2013 Nov;112(7):1303-19. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct197. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
5
Is Remusatia (araceae) monophyletic? Evidence from three plastid regions.藜芦科 Remusatia 是否为单系类群?来自三个质体区域的证据。
Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(1):71-83. doi: 10.3390/ijms13010071. Epub 2011 Dec 22.