Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology. The University of California-Santa Barbara, CA 93106.
Integr Comp Biol. 2007 Nov;47(5):759-69. doi: 10.1093/icb/icm050. Epub 2007 Jun 22.
Biologists are amazed by the intricacy and complexity of biological interactions between molecules, cells, organisms, and ecosystems. Yet underlying all this biodiversity is a universal common ancestry. How does evolution proceed from common starting points to generate the riotous biodiversity we see today? This "novelty problem"-understanding how novelty and common ancestry relate-has become of critical importance, especially since the realization that genes and developmental processes are often conserved across vast phylogenetic distances. In particular, two processes have emerged as the primary generators of diversity in organismal form: duplication plus divergence and co-option. In this article, we first illustrate how phylogenetic methodology and "tree-thinking" can be used to distinguish duplication plus divergence from co-option. Second, we review two case studies in photoreceptor evolution-one suggesting a role for duplication plus divergence, the other exemplifying how co-option can shape evolutionary change. Finally, we discuss how our tree-thinking approach differs from other treatments of the origin of novelty that utilized a "linear-thinking" approach in which evolution is viewed as a linear and gradual progression, often from simple to complex phenotype, driven by natural selection.
生物学家对分子、细胞、生物和生态系统之间复杂而精细的生物相互作用感到惊讶。然而,所有这些生物多样性的背后都有一个普遍的共同祖先。进化是如何从共同的起点出发,产生我们今天看到的这种丰富多彩的多样性的呢?这个“新颖性问题”——理解新颖性和共同祖先之间的关系——变得至关重要,尤其是因为人们意识到基因和发育过程在很大的系统发育距离上经常是保守的。特别是,有两个过程已经成为生物体形态多样性的主要生成器:复制加分歧和共适应。在本文中,我们首先说明如何使用系统发生方法和“树思维”来区分复制加分歧和共适应。其次,我们回顾了两个光感受器进化的案例研究——一个表明了复制加分歧的作用,另一个则例证了共适应如何塑造进化变化。最后,我们讨论了我们的树思维方法与其他新颖起源的处理方法有何不同,后者采用了“线性思维”方法,认为进化是一个线性和渐进的过程,通常是由自然选择驱动的,从简单到复杂的表型。