Ong G
Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore.
J Clin Periodontol. 1990 Aug;17(7 Pt 1):463-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1990.tb02345.x.
The relative effectiveness of waxed dental floss, dental tape and Superfloss as proximal plaque removal aids were compared in 20 subjects. Each subject used each of the three interdental aids for 1 week. The order of use was randomly selected. Interdental plaque scores were recorded at baseline, weeks 1, 2 and 3. At the end of week 3, subjects answered a questionnaire to ascertain their subjective responses to the 3 types of dental floss they had used. The use of all 3 types of dental floss resulted in significant improvement in interproximal plaque scores compared to baseline scores. Improvement in plaque scores, in decreasing order were: dental tape, dental floss and Superfloss. Dental tape was significantly more efficient than Superfloss (p = 0.003). There were no significant differences observed between the effectiveness of dental tape and waxed floss (p = 0.059), and waxed dental floss and Superfloss (p = 0.143). Regardless of the type of dental floss used, patients removed plaque more efficiently from buccal interproximal areas compared to lingual/palatal interproximal areas (p less than 0.001) and from anterior teeth than posterior teeth (p less than 0.001). Subjective responses indicated that 50% of subjects preferred dental tape, 40% waxed dental floss and only 10% preferred Superfloss.
在20名受试者中比较了含蜡牙线、牙间刷和超牙线作为邻面菌斑清除辅助工具的相对有效性。每位受试者使用这三种牙间清洁工具各1周。使用顺序随机选择。在基线、第1、2和3周记录牙间菌斑评分。在第3周结束时,受试者回答一份问卷,以确定他们对所使用的3种牙线的主观反应。与基线评分相比,使用所有3种牙线均使邻面菌斑评分有显著改善。菌斑评分改善程度从高到低依次为:牙间刷、含蜡牙线和超牙线。牙间刷比超牙线显著更有效(p = 0.003)。牙间刷和含蜡牙线的有效性之间(p = 0.059)以及含蜡牙线和超牙线的有效性之间(p = 0.143)未观察到显著差异。无论使用哪种牙线,患者从颊侧邻面区域清除菌斑比从舌侧/腭侧邻面区域更有效(p小于0.001),从前牙清除菌斑比从后牙更有效(p小于0.001)。主观反应表明,50%的受试者更喜欢牙间刷,40%喜欢含蜡牙线,只有10%喜欢超牙线。