Suppr超能文献

使用牙线或牙签去除牙菌斑。一项个体内比较研究。

Plaque removal by dental floss or toothpicks. An intra-individual comparative study.

作者信息

Bergenholtz A, Brithon J

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 1980 Dec;7(6):516-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1980.tb02158.x.

Abstract

The amount of plaque accumulation was assessed in an intraindividual study comprising 10 individuals. During different 2-week periods, the test subjects used nylon floss (unwaxed, waxed and specially treated), silk floss (unwaxed and waxed), Superfloss or triangular toothpicks for interdental tooth cleaning. Only teeth in contact with neighboring ones and with open interdental spaces were included in the study. The plaque removal of the interdental aids used was registered by estimating the amount of plaque present at the end of each experimental period according to a Plaque Index (Silness & Löe 1964) modified for plaque registration on 10 surface units around each tooth. In general, dental floss had a higher plaque removing potential than triangular toothpicks, especially on lingual axial surfaces.

摘要

在一项包含10名个体的个体内研究中评估了牙菌斑堆积量。在不同的两周期间,测试对象使用尼龙牙线(未上蜡、上蜡和经过特殊处理的)、丝线牙线(未上蜡和上蜡的)、超级牙线或三角形牙签进行牙间隙清洁。研究仅纳入与相邻牙齿接触且牙间隙开放的牙齿。根据为在每颗牙齿周围10个表面单位上进行牙菌斑记录而修改的牙菌斑指数(Silness和Löe,1964年),通过估计每个实验期结束时存在的牙菌斑量来记录所使用的牙间隙辅助工具的牙菌斑清除情况。一般来说,牙线比三角形牙签具有更高的牙菌斑清除潜力,尤其是在舌侧轴面。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验