Bergenholtz A, Brithon J
J Clin Periodontol. 1980 Dec;7(6):516-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1980.tb02158.x.
The amount of plaque accumulation was assessed in an intraindividual study comprising 10 individuals. During different 2-week periods, the test subjects used nylon floss (unwaxed, waxed and specially treated), silk floss (unwaxed and waxed), Superfloss or triangular toothpicks for interdental tooth cleaning. Only teeth in contact with neighboring ones and with open interdental spaces were included in the study. The plaque removal of the interdental aids used was registered by estimating the amount of plaque present at the end of each experimental period according to a Plaque Index (Silness & Löe 1964) modified for plaque registration on 10 surface units around each tooth. In general, dental floss had a higher plaque removing potential than triangular toothpicks, especially on lingual axial surfaces.
在一项包含10名个体的个体内研究中评估了牙菌斑堆积量。在不同的两周期间,测试对象使用尼龙牙线(未上蜡、上蜡和经过特殊处理的)、丝线牙线(未上蜡和上蜡的)、超级牙线或三角形牙签进行牙间隙清洁。研究仅纳入与相邻牙齿接触且牙间隙开放的牙齿。根据为在每颗牙齿周围10个表面单位上进行牙菌斑记录而修改的牙菌斑指数(Silness和Löe,1964年),通过估计每个实验期结束时存在的牙菌斑量来记录所使用的牙间隙辅助工具的牙菌斑清除情况。一般来说,牙线比三角形牙签具有更高的牙菌斑清除潜力,尤其是在舌侧轴面。