Suppr超能文献

两种替代手臂支撑方式对移液过程中肩部和上背部肌肉负荷的影响。

The effect of two alternative arm supports on shoulder and upper back muscle loading during pipetting.

作者信息

Rempel Paul, Janowitz Ira, Alexandre Melanie, Lee David L, Rempel David

机构信息

University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

出版信息

Work. 2011;39(2):195-200. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1166.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pipetting involves static upper arm positions with the pipette held away from the body for sustained periods of time, putting increased musculoskeletal load on the shoulder and upper back. This study explores the effect of using two alternative arm supports while pipetting on muscle loading in the shoulder/neck region.

PARTICIPANTS

15 experienced pipette users participated in this study.

METHODS

In a repeated-measures design, participants performed simulated pipetting in a laboratory setting under three arm support conditions: (1) a gel pad on the work surface, (2) a freely-moving counter-balanced forearm support, and (3) no support (control). Surface electromyography (EMG) of the anterior deltoid and upper trapezius muscles were recorded, as well as productivity and subjective usability.

RESULTS

Both arm support conditions resulted in significantly lower mean muscle activity of the anterior deltoid and upper trapezius muscles (p<0.001) and significantly higher subjective comfort ratings (p<0.001) compared to the control condition. The freely moving forearm support resulted in significantly lower peak muscle activity in the anterior deltoid compared to the control condition (p<0.001). Productivity was not affected by the arm supports. These findings suggest that arm support may be beneficial in reducing muscle loading and improving comfort in the shoulder and upper back during pipetting. Future studies are needed to measure the impact of these arm supports in the workplace.

摘要

目的

移液操作涉及上臂保持静止姿势,移液器远离身体并持续较长时间,这会增加肩部和上背部的肌肉骨骼负荷。本研究探讨在移液操作时使用两种替代手臂支撑方式对肩颈区域肌肉负荷的影响。

参与者

15名经验丰富的移液使用者参与了本研究。

方法

采用重复测量设计,参与者在实验室环境下于三种手臂支撑条件下进行模拟移液操作:(1)工作表面放置凝胶垫;(2)可自由移动的平衡前臂支撑;(3)无支撑(对照)。记录三角肌前部和斜方肌上部的表面肌电图(EMG),以及工作效率和主观易用性。

结果

与对照条件相比,两种手臂支撑条件均导致三角肌前部和斜方肌上部的平均肌肉活动显著降低(p<0.001),主观舒适度评分显著提高(p<0.001)。与对照条件相比,可自由移动的前臂支撑使三角肌前部的肌肉活动峰值显著降低(p<0.001)。工作效率不受手臂支撑的影响。这些发现表明,手臂支撑可能有助于在移液操作期间减轻肩部和上背部的肌肉负荷并提高舒适度。未来需要开展研究以测量这些手臂支撑在工作场所的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验