• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当医生就诊的共付额会影响供给和需求时:来自以色列国家健康保险制度自然实验的发现。

When co-payments for physician visits can affect supply as well as demand: findings from a natural experiment in Israel's national health insurance system.

机构信息

Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Health Plann Manage. 2011 Apr-Jun;26(2):e68-84. doi: 10.1002/hpm.1039. Epub 2010 May 4.

DOI:10.1002/hpm.1039
PMID:21674609
Abstract

In 1998, Israel's national health insurance system introduced a modest co-payment for visits to specialist physicians. This study takes advantage of a natural experiment in which 15% of the population--the poor and disabled--was exempted from these co-payments. It used the micro-level panel data of three large health plans on the physician visits of 50,000 members per plan in 1997-2001. The data indicate that, following introduction of the co-payment, specialist visits increased among non-exempt members, relative to exempt members, of two health plans that together account for two-thirds of the population. This paper illustrates how, unlike the Health Insurance Experiment and other US studies of cost sharing, the structure of the co-payment in Israel may have inadvertently limited the incentive to decrease consumer demand and may have created an incentive for the health plans to increase visit rates, especially among the non-exempt members. Other countries that have implemented co-payment systems with exemptions may benefit from the Israeli experience in designing and evaluating their systems.

摘要

1998 年,以色列的国家健康保险制度对专科医生的就诊引入了适度的共付额。本研究利用了一项自然实验,其中 15%的人口——贫困人口和残疾人——被豁免了这些共付额。它使用了三个大型健康计划的微观层面面板数据,这些数据涵盖了每个计划在 1997-2001 年期间的 50,000 名成员的就诊情况。数据表明,在引入共付额后,相对于豁免成员,两个健康计划的非豁免成员的专科就诊增加了,这两个健康计划共占人口的三分之二。本文说明了与健康保险实验和美国其他成本分担研究不同的是,以色列共付额的结构可能无意中限制了减少消费者需求的激励,并且可能为健康计划创造了增加就诊率的激励,尤其是在非豁免成员中。其他实施了豁免共付额制度的国家可以从以色列在设计和评估其系统方面的经验中受益。

相似文献

1
When co-payments for physician visits can affect supply as well as demand: findings from a natural experiment in Israel's national health insurance system.当医生就诊的共付额会影响供给和需求时:来自以色列国家健康保险制度自然实验的发现。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2011 Apr-Jun;26(2):e68-84. doi: 10.1002/hpm.1039. Epub 2010 May 4.
2
Changes in drug economy in Israel's health maintenance organizations in the wake of the National Health Insurance Law.《国家医疗保险法》颁布后以色列健康维护组织的药品经济变化
Isr Med Assoc J. 2001 Aug;3(8):605-9.
3
The effect of variable health insurance deductibles on the demand for physician visits.可变医疗保险免赔额对门诊需求的影响。
Health Econ. 2001 Jul;10(5):441-56. doi: 10.1002/hec.630.
4
Co-payments for prescription drugs and the demand for doctor visits--evidence from a natural experiment.处方药的自付费用与看医生的需求——来自一项自然实验的证据。
Health Econ. 2004 Nov;13(11):1081-9. doi: 10.1002/hec.868.
5
[Co-payment for public health care services--public opinion survey].[公共医疗保健服务的自付费用——民意调查]
Przegl Epidemiol. 2011;65(2):363-70.
6
The effects of outpatient co-payment policy on healthcare usage by the elderly in Taiwan.台湾门诊自付费用政策对老年人医疗保健利用的影响。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2006 Jul-Aug;43(1):101-16. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2005.09.007. Epub 2005 Nov 8.
7
[Knowledge of "Hardship Exemptions" in statutory sickness insurance].法定医疗保险中“困难豁免”的相关知识
Gesundheitswesen. 2002 Nov;64(11):565-71. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35519.
8
Effects of cost sharing on physician utilization under favourable conditions for supplier-induced demand.在供方诱导需求的有利条件下,成本分担对医生诊疗利用的影响。
Health Econ. 2001 Jul;10(5):457-71. doi: 10.1002/hec.631.
9
Introducing co-payment for consultant specialist services.引入专科门诊专家服务的自付费用。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2006 Aug;8(8):558-62.
10
The impact of cost sharing of prescription drug expenditures on health care utilization by the elderly: own- and cross-price elasticities.处方药支出费用分担对老年人医疗保健利用的影响:自价格弹性和交叉价格弹性
Health Policy. 2007 Aug;82(3):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.11.002. Epub 2006 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Personalized messaging enhances hospital debt collection while prosocial appeals fail: Evidence from a field experiment.个性化信息传递可提高医院债务回收效率,而亲社会诉求则不然:来自一项实地实验的证据。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 1;10:20552076241277035. doi: 10.1177/20552076241277035. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Impact of differential copayment on patient healthcare choice: evidence from South Korean National Cohort Study.不同共付额对患者医疗保健选择的影响:来自韩国全国队列研究的证据。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 23;11(6):e044549. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044549.
3
Second opinion utilization by healthcare insurance type in a mixed private-public healthcare system: a population-based study.
混合公私医疗体系中医疗保险类型的二次诊疗意见使用情况:一项基于人群的研究
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 27;9(7):e025673. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025673.
4
Co-insurance and health care utilization in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a discontinuity regression approach.共付保险与日本类风湿关节炎患者医疗利用的关系:间断回归分析方法。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jan 28;18(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0920-7.
5
Does charging different user fees for primary and secondary care affect first-contacts with primary healthcare? A systematic review.对初级和二级医疗收取不同的用户费用是否会影响与初级医疗保健的首次接触?一项系统评价。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Jun 1;32(5):723-731. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw178.
6
How does copayment for health care services affect demand, health and redistribution? A systematic review of the empirical evidence from 1990 to 2011.医疗服务的自付费用如何影响需求、健康状况和再分配?对1990年至2011年实证证据的系统综述。
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Nov;15(8):813-28. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0526-8. Epub 2013 Aug 29.