• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

完全植入式静脉输液港的长期并发症:锁骨下静脉与颈内静脉穿刺的随机对照研究。

Long-term complications in totally implantable venous access devices: randomized study comparing subclavian and internal jugular vein puncture.

机构信息

Pediatric Surgery Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Feb;58(2):274-7. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23220. Epub 2011 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1002/pbc.23220
PMID:21674765
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This prospective randomized study evaluated complications related to long-term totally implantable catheters in oncologic children and adolescents by comparing venopunction performed either in the jugular or subclavian vein.

METHODS

A total of 83 catheters were implanted from January 2004 to April 2006 and followed-up until March 2008. Patients were randomly allocated to the subclavian or jugular vein group. The endpoint was complications that led to catheter revision or catheter removal.

RESULTS

Six patients were excluded, 43 had the catheter implanted in the subclavian and 34 in the jugular vein. Subclavian catheters were used for up to 12.6 months, while jugular catheters were kept in place for up to 14.8 months (P = 0.38). No statistical differences were found between the groups concerning age, sex, leukocyte count, platelet count, type of admission (in or outpatient), or previous chemotherapy regimens. When analyzed individually, long-term complications did not present statistically significant differences either. Infection occurred in 20 and 11% (P = 0.44), while catheter embolism took place in 23 and 8% (P = 0.11) of patients with subclavian and jugular catheters, respectively. A statistical difference was seen in the total number of complications, which occurred in 48 and 23% (P = 0.02) of patients in the subclavian and in the jugular groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheters implanted by puncture in the subclavian vein were more prone to late complications than those implanted in the jugular vein.

摘要

背景

本前瞻性随机研究通过比较经颈内静脉和锁骨下静脉行静脉穿刺置管术,评估了长期全植入式导管在肿瘤患儿和青少年中的并发症,并将结果进行了对比。

方法

2004 年 1 月至 2006 年 4 月共植入 83 根导管,随访至 2008 年 3 月。患者被随机分配到锁骨下静脉组或颈内静脉组。终点是导致导管修改或导管移除的并发症。

结果

6 名患者被排除在外,43 名患者在锁骨下静脉植入导管,34 名患者在颈内静脉植入导管。锁骨下导管最长使用时间为 12.6 个月,而颈内导管最长使用时间为 14.8 个月(P = 0.38)。两组在年龄、性别、白细胞计数、血小板计数、入院类型(门诊或住院)或之前的化疗方案方面无统计学差异。单独分析时,长期并发症也没有统计学差异。感染发生率分别为 20%和 11%(P = 0.44),而导管栓塞发生率分别为 23%和 8%(P = 0.11)。锁骨下组和颈内组的总并发症发生率分别为 48%和 23%,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.02)。

结论

经锁骨下穿刺植入的导管比经颈内静脉植入的导管更容易发生晚期并发症。

相似文献

1
Long-term complications in totally implantable venous access devices: randomized study comparing subclavian and internal jugular vein puncture.完全植入式静脉输液港的长期并发症:锁骨下静脉与颈内静脉穿刺的随机对照研究。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Feb;58(2):274-7. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23220. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
2
A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients.1201例癌症患者中两条中心静脉用于植入全植入式静脉通路装置的比较研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008 Feb;34(2):222-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.04.003. Epub 2007 Jun 12.
3
[Complications after insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in patients treated with chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].[头颈部鳞状细胞癌化疗患者植入全植入式静脉通路端口后的并发症]
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 2009 Apr;126(2):43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aorl.2009.02.005. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
4
External jugular Groshong catheter is associated with fewer complications than a subclavian Argyle catheter.颈外静脉Groshong导管比锁骨下阿盖尔导管的并发症更少。
Eur Surg Res. 2008;40(2):197-202. doi: 10.1159/000110861. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
5
Avoiding complications of long-term venous access.避免长期静脉通路的并发症。
Am Surg. 1993 Sep;59(9):555-8.
6
Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports: catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain perception.颈静脉与锁骨下完全植入式输液港:导管位置、并发症和介入治疗中的疼痛感知。
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Sep;79(3):338-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.010. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
7
Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters.在一项对2595根导管进行的前瞻性观察研究中的中心静脉导管相关感染
Crit Care. 2005;9(6):R631-5. doi: 10.1186/cc3824. Epub 2005 Sep 28.
8
Complications in large-bore catheters for extracorporeal detoxification methods.用于体外解毒方法的大口径导管的并发症。
Artif Organs. 2004 Jul;28(7):629-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2004.07369.x.
9
[Recirculation of urea and dialysis efficiency using dual-lumen dialysis catheters in various locations: may the venous lumen of the catheter be used as the arterial lumen and vice versa?].[不同部位使用双腔透析导管时尿素的再循环及透析效率:导管的静脉腔可作为动脉腔使用,反之亦然吗?]
Lijec Vjesn. 2003 Jan-Feb;125(1-2):1-5.
10
[Long term central venous catheterization revisited].[重新审视长期中心静脉置管术]
Minerva Anestesiol. 1995 Nov;61(11):451-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing internal jugular vein and subclavian vein for central venous insertion of implantable ports in cancer chemotherapy: a meta-analysis of RCTs.比较颈内静脉和锁骨下静脉在癌症化疗中植入式端口中心静脉置管的应用:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2025 May 26;15:1566757. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1566757. eCollection 2025.
2
Internal jugular vein versus external jugular vein as the insertion site for totally implantable venous access ports in children: a randomized comparative study.儿童完全植入式静脉通路端口插入部位:颈内静脉与颈外静脉的随机对照研究
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Feb 12;41(1):78. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-05981-4.
3
Clinical applications and research progress of totally implantable venous access ports: a literature review.
完全植入式静脉输液港的临床应用与研究进展:文献综述
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 16;14:1519728. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1519728. eCollection 2024.
4
Clinical Effect of Modified Ultrasound-Guided Subclavian Vein Puncture.改良超声引导下锁骨下静脉穿刺的临床效果。
Int J Clin Pract. 2023 Jul 6;2023:5534451. doi: 10.1155/2023/5534451. eCollection 2023.
5
Impact of insertion site on complications in central venous access devices.置入部位对中心静脉置管并发症的影响。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Feb 11;39(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05399-w.
6
International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology (IPSO) Surgical Practice Guidelines.国际小儿外科肿瘤学会(IPSO)手术实践指南
Ecancermedicalscience. 2022 Feb 17;16:1356. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1356. eCollection 2022.
7
Removal of "ruptured" pulmonary artery infusion port catheter by pigtail catheter combined with gooseneck trap: A case report.使用猪尾导管联合鹅颈圈套器取出“破裂”的肺动脉灌注端口导管:一例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Oct 16;9(29):8820-8824. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8820.
8
Totally implantable venous access port insertion via open Seldinger approach of the internal jugular vein-a retrospective risk stratification of 500 consecutive patients.经颈内静脉开放 Seldinger 入路行完全植入式静脉输液港置入术——500 例连续患者的回顾性风险分层。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 May;406(3):903-910. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02097-w. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
9
Implantable Venous Access Devices in Pediatric Malignancies - Institutional Experience in a Developing Nation.儿科恶性肿瘤中的可植入静脉通路装置——一个发展中国家的机构经验
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2020 Sep-Oct;25(5):286-290. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_121_19. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
10
Cephalic vein approach for the implantable central venous access: A retrospective review of the single institution's experiences; Cohort Study.用于可植入式中心静脉通路的头静脉入路:单机构经验的回顾性研究;队列研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(46):e18007. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018007.