• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

协调痴呆症患者护理的合作项目。

Collaborative project to co-ordinate care for patients with dementia.

作者信息

Kennerley Dorothy, Bolas Robert, Bourne Jennifer, Branson Kathy, Cavenagh Penny, Chappell Pam, Collins Gwen, Coveney Nick, Day Nicole, Hardman Mary, Hayter Sue, Fenner Pam, Jones Jennifer, Jordan Siobhan, Noble Brendon, Osbourne Sarah, Smith Carol, Wigens Lynn

出版信息

Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2011 May;18(2):27-31. doi: 10.7748/nm2011.05.18.2.27.c8484.

DOI:10.7748/nm2011.05.18.2.27.c8484
PMID:21675487
Abstract

Health leaders from across Suffolk joined together in a collaborative action-learning project to identify ways of offering more productive and personalised care for patients with dementia and their carers. The project revealed a range of factors necessary for success, notably professional collaboration and effective facilitation. The outcome was a range of evidenced-based recommendations to improve care and efficiency, as well as ensuring that the quality, innovation, productivity and prevention (QIPP) agenda was met. The lessons can be applied not just in dementia care, but to other long-term and complex care situations.

摘要

来自萨福克郡各地的医疗保健负责人共同参与了一个合作行动学习项目,以确定为痴呆症患者及其护理人员提供更高效、更个性化护理的方法。该项目揭示了成功所需的一系列因素,特别是专业合作和有效推动。结果是提出了一系列基于证据的建议,以改善护理和提高效率,并确保实现质量、创新、生产力和预防(QIPP)议程。这些经验教训不仅可以应用于痴呆症护理,还可以应用于其他长期和复杂的护理情况。

相似文献

1
Collaborative project to co-ordinate care for patients with dementia.协调痴呆症患者护理的合作项目。
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2011 May;18(2):27-31. doi: 10.7748/nm2011.05.18.2.27.c8484.
2
Collaborative networks for both improvement and research.合作网络,用于改进和研究。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131 Suppl 4:S210-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3786H.
3
The Indiana University Center for Healthcare Innovation and Implementation Science: Bridging healthcare research and delivery to build a learning healthcare system.印第安纳大学医疗保健创新与实施科学中心:架起医疗保健研究与服务的桥梁,构建学习型医疗保健系统。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(2):138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 May 1.
4
Patient- and family-centred care on an acute adult cardiac ward.成人急性心脏病房中的患者及家庭中心护理。
Br J Nurs. 2014;23(4):213-8. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.4.213.
5
The Vermont Oxford Network: evidence-based quality improvement for neonatology.佛蒙特牛津网络:新生儿学基于证据的质量改进。
Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):350-9.
6
Patient-centred interprofessional collaboration in primary care: challenges for clinical, educational and health services research. An EGPRN keynote paper.基层医疗中以患者为中心的跨专业协作:临床、教育与卫生服务研究面临的挑战。一篇欧洲全科医学研究网络(EGPRN)主题演讲论文。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2014 Dec;20(4):327-32. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2014.908462. Epub 2014 Jun 1.
7
Overcoming challenges in improvement work.克服改进工作中的挑战。
J Ren Care. 2013 Sep;39 Suppl 2:30-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2013.12027.x.
8
Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement: the need for an evidence base.衡量患者和公众参与的影响:建立证据基础的必要性。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Dec;20(6):373-4. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn044. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
9
"It was like reading a detective novel": Using PAR to work together for culture change.“这就像在读一本侦探小说”:运用参与式行动研究共同推动文化变革。
J Aging Stud. 2015 Aug;34:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
10
Implementation of Releasing Time to Care - the productive ward.实施释放护理时间——高效病房。
J Nurs Manag. 2009 Jul;17(5):647-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01026.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrated Care Pathways and Care Bundles for Dementia in Acute Care: Concept Versus Evidence.急性护理中痴呆症的综合护理路径与护理包:概念与证据
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2017 Jun;32(4):189-193. doi: 10.1177/1533317517698791. Epub 2017 Apr 12.