University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, CT, USA.
Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Jul;65(7):749-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02694.x.
Warfarin significantly reduces thromboembolic risk, but perceptions of associated bleeding risk limit its use. The evidence supporting the association between bleeding and individual patient risks factors is unclear. This systematic review aims to determine the strength of evidence supporting an accentuated bleeding risk when patients with risk factors listed in the warfarin prescribing information are prescribed the drug. A systematic literature search of MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted to identify studies reporting multivariate relationships between prespecified covariates and the risk of bleeding in patients receiving warfarin. The prespecified covariates were identified based on patient characteristics for bleeding listed in the warfarin package insert. Each covariate was evaluated for its association with specific types of bleeding. The quality of individual evaluations was rated as 'good', 'fair' or 'poor' using methods consistent with those recommended by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Overall strength of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development (GRADE) criteria and categorised as 'insufficient', 'very low', 'low', 'moderate' or 'high'. Thirty-four studies, reporting 134 multivariate evaluations of the association between a covariate and bleeding risk were identified. The majority of evaluations had a low strength of evidence for the association between covariates and bleeding and none had a high strength of evidence. Malignancy and renal insufficiency were the only two covariates that had a moderate strength of evidence for their association with major and minor bleeding respectively. The associations between covariates listed in the warfarin prescribing information and increased bleeding risk are not well supported by the medical literature.
华法林显著降低血栓栓塞风险,但对相关出血风险的认知限制了其应用。出血风险与个体患者危险因素之间关联的证据并不明确。本系统评价旨在确定当具有华法林说明书中列出的危险因素的患者服用该药物时,出血风险增加的证据强度。对 MEDLINE 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 进行了系统文献检索,以确定报告了预设协变量与接受华法林治疗的患者出血风险之间多变量关系的研究。基于华法林说明书中列出的出血患者特征,确定了预设协变量。评估了每个协变量与特定类型出血的相关性。使用与医疗保健研究和质量局 (AHRQ) 推荐方法一致的方法,对个体评估的质量进行了“良好”、“一般”或“差”的评级。使用推荐评估、制定 (GRADE) 标准确定总体证据强度,并将其分类为“不足”、“极低”、“低”、“中”或“高”。确定了 34 项研究,这些研究报告了 134 项对协变量与出血风险之间关联的多变量评估。大多数评估结果表明,协变量与出血之间的关联证据强度较低,没有一项评估结果具有较高的证据强度。恶性肿瘤和肾功能不全是唯一两种与大出血和小出血风险相关的协变量,具有中度证据强度。华法林说明书中列出的协变量与出血风险增加之间的关联并没有得到医学文献的充分支持。