Gyollai Agoston, Simor Peter, Koteles Ferenc, Demetrovics Zsolt
Institute of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Neuropsychopharmacol Hung. 2011 Jun;13(2):73-9.
Psychometric properties of the Hungarian version of the original and the short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) were investigated in the present study.
Participants were undergraduate university students (N=1163) and patients visiting their General Practitioners (GPs) for various somatic complaints (N=466).
According to the confirmatory factor analysis, both versions showed adequate fit to the theoretical one-and-one (positive and negative affect) factor model. Internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach-alpha values) were above .8 for the original positive and negative scales, .73 and .79 for the short positive scale, and .65 and .67 for the short negative scale in the student and the patient groups, respectively. The correlations between the original 10-item subscales and their 5-item counterparts were above .9 in both groups.
The short PANAS scale represents a good and practical alternative for the original version, with lower but still acceptable internal consistency values.
本研究对匈牙利语版原始版及简版积极与消极情绪量表（PANAS）的心理测量学特性进行了调查。
参与者包括本科大学生（N = 1163）以及因各种躯体不适前往全科医生（GP）处就诊的患者（N = 466）。
根据验证性因素分析，两个版本均显示出与理论上的一对一（积极和消极情绪）因素模型有良好的拟合度。在学生组和患者组中，原始版积极和消极量表的内部一致性系数（克朗巴赫α值）均高于0.8，简版积极量表分别为0.73和0.79，简版消极量表分别为0.65和0.67。两组中，原始的10项子量表与其对应的5项子量表之间的相关性均高于0.9。
简版PANAS量表是原始版的一个良好且实用的替代版本，其内部一致性值较低但仍可接受。
