Suppr超能文献

初产妇和经产妇引产与急诊剖宫产的风险。

Induction of labor and the risk for emergency cesarean section in nulliparous and multiparous women.

机构信息

Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Oct;90(10):1094-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01213.x. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk for emergency cesarean section among women in whom labor was induced in gestational week ≥41 and to evaluate if parity and mode of induction affected this association.

DESIGN

Hospital-based retrospective cohort study.

POPULATION

Singleton pregnancies delivered after ≥41 gestational weeks at Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, during 2002-2006.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of 23 030 singleton pregnancies meeting the entry criteria, 881 were induced with a Bishop score of <7. Obstetric outcome was assessed through linkage with the Swedish Medical Birth Registry and a local obstetrical database containing information from patients' medical files. Results were adjusted for body mass index, age and the use of epidural analgesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Risk for emergency cesarean section.

RESULTS

Among women who were induced, the proportions delivered by emergency cesarean section were 42% for nulliparous and 14% for multiparous. Compared to spontaneous onset, this corresponded to a more than threefold increase in risk for nulliparous women (OR 3.34, 95%CI 2.77-4.04) and an almost twofold increase in risk for multiparous women (OR 1.94, 95%CI 1.24-3.02). There was no significant difference in risk for emergency cesarean section between the two methods of induction (PGE(2) and transcervical catheter).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to spontaneous onset of delivery, induction of labor is associated with an increased risk for emergency cesarean section both among nulliparous and multiparous women. When labor is induced, the high risk for emergency cesarean must be kept in mind.

摘要

目的

评估妊娠 41 周及以上行引产孕妇行急诊剖宫产的风险,并评估初产妇与经产妇、引产方式对该关联的影响。

设计

医院回顾性队列研究。

人群

2002 年至 2006 年在瑞典斯德哥尔摩 Danderyd 医院分娩、妊娠 41 周及以上的单胎妊娠。

材料和方法

在符合纳入标准的 23030 例单胎妊娠中,881 例行 Bishop 评分<7 的引产。通过与瑞典医学出生登记处和包含患者病历信息的当地产科数据库的链接评估产科结局。结果通过调整体质量指数、年龄和硬膜外镇痛的使用进行校正。

主要观察指标

急诊剖宫产风险。

结果

在接受引产的孕妇中,行急诊剖宫产的比例分别为初产妇 42%和经产妇 14%。与自发临产相比,初产妇的剖宫产风险增加超过三倍(OR 3.34,95%CI 2.77-4.04),经产妇的剖宫产风险增加近两倍(OR 1.94,95%CI 1.24-3.02)。两种引产方法(前列腺素 E2 和经宫颈导管)之间的急诊剖宫产风险无显著差异(PGE2 与经宫颈导管)。

结论

与自发临产相比,引产与初产妇和经产妇行急诊剖宫产的风险增加相关。行引产时,应充分考虑到急诊剖宫产的高风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验