• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与初产妇剖宫产相关的因素:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。

Factors associated with cesarean birth in nulliparous women: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):812-822. doi: 10.1111/birt.12654. Epub 2022 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1111/birt.12654
PMID:35695041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9796356/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is widespread concern around the rising rates of cesarean births (CBs), especially among first-time mothers, despite evidence suggesting increased morbidities after birth by cesarean. There are uncertainties around factors associated with rising rates of CBs among first-time mothers in Ireland, and insight into these is essential for understanding the rising trend in CBs. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the factors associated with CBs in nulliparous women.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted in three maternity hospitals in the Republic of Ireland between 2012 and 2017. Data were collected from 3047 nulliparous women using self-administered surveys antenatally and at 3 months postpartum and from consenting women's hospital records (n = 2755) and analyzed using the Poisson regression to assess associations between demographic and clinical factors and the main outcome measures, planned and unplanned CBs.

RESULTS

Common risk factors for planned and unplanned CBs were being aged ≥40 years, being in private care, multiple pregnancy, and fetus in breech or other malpresentations. An unplanned CB occurred for 22.43% (n = 377/1681) of women who did not have induction of labor (IOL) or who had IOL with no epidural, but the risk was about twice as high for women who had IOL and epidural.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings confirm multifactorial reasons for CB and the challenge of reversing the increasing CB rate if maternal age, overweight/obesity, infertility treatment, multiple pregnancy, and preexisting hypertension in Ireland continue to increase. There is a need to address prelabor interventions, especially IOL combined with epidural analgesia with respect to unplanned CB.

摘要

背景

尽管有证据表明剖宫产(CB)后出生的发病率增加,但由于人们对爱尔兰初产妇 CB 率上升的相关因素存在广泛担忧,因此了解这些因素对于理解 CB 上升趋势至关重要。因此,本研究旨在确定与初产妇 CB 相关的因素。

方法

2012 年至 2017 年,在爱尔兰共和国的三家产科医院进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。通过产前和产后 3 个月的自我管理问卷调查,收集了 3047 名初产妇的数据,并从同意的女性医院记录中收集了数据(n=2755),使用泊松回归分析评估了人口统计学和临床因素与主要结局指标(计划性和非计划性 CB)之间的关联。

结果

计划性和非计划性 CB 的常见危险因素为年龄≥40 岁、私人护理、多胎妊娠和胎儿臀位或其他异常位置。未行引产(IOL)或 IOL 无硬膜外麻醉的妇女中,22.43%(n=377/1681)发生了非计划性 CB,但行 IOL 联合硬膜外麻醉的妇女风险约为前者的两倍。

结论

研究结果证实了 CB 的多因素原因,如果爱尔兰的产妇年龄、超重/肥胖、不孕治疗、多胎妊娠和既往高血压继续增加,逆转 CB 率上升的挑战仍然存在。有必要针对产前干预措施,特别是 IOL 联合硬膜外镇痛与非计划性 CB 进行干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13bf/9796356/d3915106ef26/BIRT-49-812-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13bf/9796356/c1ff4cfd06a3/BIRT-49-812-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13bf/9796356/d3915106ef26/BIRT-49-812-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13bf/9796356/c1ff4cfd06a3/BIRT-49-812-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13bf/9796356/d3915106ef26/BIRT-49-812-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors associated with cesarean birth in nulliparous women: A multicenter prospective cohort study.与初产妇剖宫产相关的因素:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):812-822. doi: 10.1111/birt.12654. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
2
Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study.足月初产妇剖宫产预测:前瞻性多中心 Genesis 研究结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):598.e1-598.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
3
Effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor on frequency of emergency cesarean delivery among nulliparous Chinese women.腰麻-硬膜外联合镇痛对中国初产妇急诊剖宫产率的影响。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Dec;135(3):259-263. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.05.017. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
4
Associations Among Intrapartum Interventions and Cesarean Birth in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women with Spontaneous Onset of Labor.低危初产妇自发性临产时产程中干预措施与剖宫产的关系。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):142-148. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12975. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
5
Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.初产妇引产术后的 Bishop 评分与剖宫产风险
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;105(4):690-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38.
6
Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.足月选择性引产的母婴结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):273.e1-273.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
7
Using Robson classification to analyze cesarean section and induction rates in relation to changes in the standards of perinatal care in one hospital in Poland.运用罗伯逊分类法分析波兰一家医院围产保健标准变化与剖宫产率和引产率的关系。
Birth. 2024 Jun;51(2):384-394. doi: 10.1111/birt.12794. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
8
Mode of delivery after epidural analgesia in a cohort of low-risk nulliparas.低危初产妇人群行硬膜外分娩镇痛后的分娩方式。
Birth. 2011 Dec;38(4):317-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00486.x. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
9
Epidural analgesia and risks of cesarean and operative vaginal deliveries in nulliparous and multiparous women.硬膜外镇痛与初产妇和经产妇剖宫产和经阴道分娩的风险。
Matern Child Health J. 2010 Sep;14(5):705-712. doi: 10.1007/s10995-009-0515-9.
10
Obstetric interventions, trends, and drivers of change: A 20-year population-based study from Iceland.产科干预措施、趋势及变化驱动因素:一项基于冰岛人群的20年研究
Birth. 2018 Dec;45(4):368-376. doi: 10.1111/birt.12353. Epub 2018 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in induction of labour and associated co-morbidities and demographics in Queensland, Australia from 2001 to 2020: a population-based study.2001年至2020年澳大利亚昆士兰州引产趋势及相关合并症和人口统计学特征:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07379-5.
2
Optimizing caesarean section use and feasibility of implementing the Robson classification system: Perspectives of healthcare providers and policymakers.优化剖宫产的使用及实施罗布森分类系统的可行性:医疗服务提供者和政策制定者的观点
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Mar 25;12:20503121241237447. doi: 10.1177/20503121241237447. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Caesarean section rates in women in the Republic of Ireland who chose to attend their obstetrician privately: a retrospective observational study.爱尔兰共和国选择私人就诊的孕妇剖宫产率:回顾性观察研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Sep 21;20(1):548. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03199-x.
2
Revisiting the management of term breech presentation: a proposal for overcoming some of the controversies.重新审视足月臀位分娩的处理:克服部分争议的建议。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 3;20(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2831-4.
3
Predictors of choice of public and private maternity care among nulliparous women in Ireland, and implications for maternity care and birth experience.
Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries: A registry-based study from Qatar.
多次重复剖宫产相关的母婴结局:一项来自卡塔尔的基于登记处的研究。
Qatar Med J. 2024 Jan 22;2024(1):3. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2024.3. eCollection 2024.
4
Association of Maternal Risk Factors with the Prevalence of Caesarean Section Deliveries: A Cross-Sectional Study.产妇危险因素与剖宫产分娩率的相关性:一项横断面研究。
Med Sci (Basel). 2023 Oct 9;11(4):66. doi: 10.3390/medsci11040066.
5
Indications of Induction and Caesarean Sections Performed Using the Robson Classification in a University Hospital in Spain from 2010 to 2021.2010年至2021年西班牙一家大学医院使用罗布森分类法进行引产和剖宫产的指征
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 23;11(11):1521. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111521.
爱尔兰初产妇选择公、私立产院分娩的影响因素,以及对母婴保健和分娩体验的影响。
Health Policy. 2020 May;124(5):556-562. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
4
Reasons for previous Cesarean deliveries impact a woman's independent decision of delivery mode and the success of trial of labor after Cesarean.既往剖宫产原因影响产妇分娩方式的独立决策和再次剖宫产试产的成功率。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Mar 24;20(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2833-2.
5
Lithuania's experience in reducing caesarean sections among nulliparas: the impact of the quality improvement course.立陶宛在降低初产妇剖宫产率方面的经验:质量改进课程的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2806-5.
6
Antenatal and intrapartum interventions for reducing caesarean section, promoting vaginal birth, and reducing fear of childbirth: An overview of systematic reviews.产前和产时干预措施以减少剖宫产、促进阴道分娩和减少分娩恐惧:系统评价概述。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 24;14(10):e0224313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224313. eCollection 2019.
7
Does maternal obesity explain trends in caesarean section rates? Evidence from a large Irish maternity hospital.产妇肥胖是否可以解释剖宫产率的变化趋势?来自爱尔兰一家大型妇产医院的证据。
Ir J Med Sci. 2020 May;189(2):571-579. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-02095-4. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
8
The ARRIVE Trial: Interpretation from an Epidemiologic Perspective.ARRIVE 试验:从流行病学角度的解读。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019 Sep;64(5):657-663. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12996. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
9
Cesarean section on a rise-Does advanced maternal age explain the increase? A population register-based study.剖宫产率上升——高龄产妇是主要原因吗?一项基于人群登记的研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 24;14(1):e0210655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210655. eCollection 2019.
10
Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies.临床医生对影响剖宫产决策因素的看法:定性、定量和混合方法研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 27;13(7):e0200941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200941. eCollection 2018.