Suppr超能文献

开口部左主干冠状动脉狭窄是体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的一个附加危险因素。

Ostial left main coronary artery stenosis as an additional risk factor in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Jan;143(1):103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Jun 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to determine whether general left main coronary artery stenosis (LMS) and ostial LMS pose additional risks after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) relative to non-left main coronary artery stenosis.

METHODS

From January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2009, 4366 patients underwent primary isolated off-pump CABG at Beijing Anzhen Hospital. Disease was retrospectively classified as non-left main disease (n = 3523), nonostial LMS (n = 765), and ostial LMS (n = 78). Groups were propensity score matched. Kaplan-Meier freedoms from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) were calculated.

RESULTS

During the first 30 postoperative days, mortality was significantly higher in the ostial LMS group (6.41%) than in non-left main disease (0.855%, χ(2) = 7.78, P = .005) and nonostial LMS (1.28%, χ(2) = 4.71, P = .03) groups. Incidence of MACCEs was significantly higher in the ostial LMS group (20.5%) than in non-left main disease (5.98%, P = .000) and nonostial LMS (9.62%, P = .002) groups. Odds ratio for early MACCEs of ostial LMS versus non-left main disease was 3.74 (95% confidence interval, 1.72-8.17). At mean follow-up 12.8 ± 7.5 months and cumulative follow-up 498.5 patient-years, difference among groups in freedom from MACCEs did not reach statistical significance (χ(2) = 2.39, P = .303).

CONCLUSIONS

Ostial LMS poses additional early risks of mortality and MACCEs in off-pump CABG. Off-pump CABG for ostial LMS should proceed with greater of intraoperative surveillance and lower threshold for converting to on-pump CABG.

摘要

背景

我们的目的是确定左主干冠状动脉狭窄(LMS)和开口 LMS 相对于非左主干冠状动脉狭窄在非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后是否会增加额外风险。

方法

2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 12 月 31 日,北京安贞医院对 4366 例患者进行了原发性单纯非体外循环 CABG。回顾性将疾病分为非左主干疾病(n=3523)、非开口 LMS(n=765)和开口 LMS(n=78)。通过倾向评分匹配。计算 Kaplan-Meier 主要不良心脏和脑血管事件(MACCEs)的无事件生存率。

结果

在术后 30 天内,开口 LMS 组(6.41%)的死亡率明显高于非左主干疾病组(0.855%,χ(2)=7.78,P=0.005)和非开口 LMS 组(1.28%,χ(2)=4.71,P=0.03)。开口 LMS 组 MACCEs 的发生率明显高于非左主干疾病组(20.5%)和非开口 LMS 组(9.62%)。开口 LMS 与非左主干疾病的早期 MACCEs 的优势比为 3.74(95%置信区间,1.72-8.17)。在平均随访 12.8±7.5 个月和累积随访 498.5 患者年时,各组间 MACCE 无事件生存率差异无统计学意义(χ(2)=2.39,P=0.303)。

结论

开口 LMS 在非体外循环 CABG 中增加了早期死亡率和 MACCEs 的风险。对于开口 LMS,应增加术中监测,并降低转为体外循环 CABG 的阈值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验