• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者体外循环与非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术:倾向评分分析

On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients: a propensity score analysis.

作者信息

Srinivasan Arun K, Grayson Antony D, Fabri Brian M

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Cardiothoracic Centre Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Nov;78(5):1604-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.080.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.080
PMID:15511441
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetic patients are recognized as being at high risk for adverse outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. We evaluated our outcomes in diabetic patients to compare the effect of off-pump with on-pump coronary revascularization.

METHODS

Between April 1997 and September 2002, 951 consecutive diabetic patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. A total of 186 (19.6%) of these patients had off-pump coronary procedures. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the effect of off-pump coronary procedures on adverse in-hospital outcomes, while adjusting for patient and disease characteristics by constructing a propensity score from core patient characteristics. The propensity score was the probability of receiving off-pump coronary operation, with a C-statistic of 0.81, and was included along with the comparison variable in a multivariable analysis of outcome. All analysis was performed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Off-pump patients were more likely to be obese (p = 0.032), have left main stem stenosis (p = 0.034), and have undergone prior cardiac operation (p = 0.027). The off-pump group had fewer patients with three-vessel disease compared with the on-pump group. After risk adjusting with propensity score, off-pump patients had a significantly lower incidence of stroke (adjusted odds ratio 0.15; p = 0.039) and renal failure (adjusted odds ratio 0.38; p = 0.036). Off-pump patients also required less blood transfusion (p < 0.001) and had shorter lengths of stay (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Off-pump coronary operation in diabetic patients significantly reduced postoperative morbidity and length of stay compared with on-pump coronary operation, although no in-hospital survival difference was noted between the two groups.

摘要

背景

糖尿病患者被认为是冠状动脉旁路移植术后出现不良后果的高危人群。我们评估了糖尿病患者的治疗结果,以比较非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉血运重建的效果。

方法

在1997年4月至2002年9月期间,951例连续的糖尿病患者接受了单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术。其中共有186例(19.6%)患者接受了非体外循环冠状动脉手术。采用多因素逻辑回归分析评估非体外循环冠状动脉手术对住院期间不良结局的影响,同时通过根据核心患者特征构建倾向评分来调整患者和疾病特征。倾向评分是接受非体外循环冠状动脉手术的概率,C统计量为0.81,并与比较变量一起纳入结局的多变量分析中。所有分析均为回顾性分析。

结果

非体外循环患者更易肥胖(p = 0.032)、有左主干狭窄(p = 0.034)且曾接受过心脏手术(p = 0.027)。与体外循环组相比,非体外循环组三支血管病变的患者较少。在通过倾向评分进行风险调整后,非体外循环患者的中风发生率显著较低(调整后的优势比为0.15;p = 0.039)和肾衰竭发生率较低(调整后的优势比为0.38;p = 0.036)。非体外循环患者也需要较少的输血(p < 0.001)且住院时间较短(p < 0.001)。

结论

与体外循环冠状动脉手术相比,糖尿病患者的非体外循环冠状动脉手术显著降低了术后发病率和住院时间,尽管两组之间未观察到住院期间生存率的差异。

相似文献

1
On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients: a propensity score analysis.糖尿病患者体外循环与非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术:倾向评分分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Nov;78(5):1604-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.080.
2
Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease.多支血管病变患者进行冠状动脉搭桥手术时体外循环使用与不使用的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Jan;127(1):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.032.
3
Total arterial revascularisation: effect of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass on in-hospital mortality and morbidity in a propensity-matched cohort.全动脉血运重建:在倾向匹配队列中避免体外循环对住院死亡率和发病率的影响。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Jan;27(1):94-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.10.049.
4
Coronary surgery in patients with peripheral vascular disease: effect of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass.外周血管疾病患者的冠状动脉手术:避免体外循环的效果
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Apr;77(4):1245-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.09.054.
5
Propensity case-matched analysis of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with atheromatous aortic disease.动脉粥样硬化性主动脉疾病患者非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的倾向病例匹配分析
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Feb;127(2):406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.011.
6
Increased early postoperative morbidity with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者行非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术术后早期发病率增加。
Can J Cardiol. 2004 Dec;20(14):1461-5.
7
On-pump versus off-pump surgical revascularization for left main stem stenosis: risk adjusted outcomes.左主干狭窄的体外循环与非体外循环手术血运重建:风险调整后的结果
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Jul;80(1):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.02.001.
8
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术可实现完全血运重建,同时减少心肌损伤、输血需求及住院时间:一项对200例未经选择的患者进行非体外循环与传统冠状动脉旁路移植术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Apr;125(4):797-808. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2003.324.
9
Trainees operating on high-risk patients without cardiopulmonary bypass: a high-risk strategy?在无体外循环情况下对高危患者进行手术的实习生:一种高危策略?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jul;78(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.10.127.
10
Off-pump CABG in diabetic patients: does insulin dependency matter?糖尿病患者的非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术:胰岛素依赖是否重要?
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2007 Jan;41(1):39-43. doi: 10.1080/14017430601050330.

引用本文的文献

1
Off-pump Versus On-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Diabetic patients: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies with a Propensity-Score Analysis.糖尿病患者非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术:一项倾向得分分析的观察性研究的荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 Jul 11. doi: 10.1007/s10557-024-07603-y.
2
In-hospital mortality of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in Iranian population.伊朗人群中严重左心室功能障碍患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术的院内死亡率。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jun 20;17(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01906-7.
3
The Effect of Acute Kidney Injury on TGF-1 and Smad3 in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease after Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后急性肾损伤对冠心病患者 TGF-β1 和 Smad3 的影响。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Nov 9;2021:1361242. doi: 10.1155/2021/1361242. eCollection 2021.
4
Five-year clinical outcomes of diabetic patients in the Randomized On/Off Bypass Follow-up (ROOBY-FS) trial-is the evidence enough to change the practice?随机旁路开通/关闭随访(ROOBY-FS)试验中糖尿病患者的五年临床结局——现有证据足以改变临床实践吗?
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;35(2):261-263. doi: 10.1007/s12055-018-00781-z. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
5
Risk Factors of On-Pump Conversion during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中体外循环转换的危险因素。
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Oct;50(5):355-362. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.5.355. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
6
Myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation; Why hasn't it convinced yet?非体外循环下心肌血运重建;为何尚未令人信服?
Ann Card Anaesth. 2017 Apr-Jun;20(2):219-225. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_39_16.
7
On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery among patients with type 2 diabetes in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial.在“搭桥血管成形血运重建研究2糖尿病”试验中2型糖尿病患者行体外循环与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植手术的比较
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):406-16. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv170. Epub 2015 May 11.
8
On-pump beating coronary artery bypass in high risk coronary patients.高危冠心病患者的体外循环下不停跳冠状动脉搭桥术
Iran J Med Sci. 2015 Jan;40(1):40-4.
9
Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery is standard of care: where do you stand?非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术是治疗的标准:你持什么立场?
Can J Cardiol. 2006 Nov;22(13):1107-10. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70945-x.
10
How to revascularize patients with diabetes mellitus: bypass or stents and drugs?如何为糖尿病患者进行血管重建:搭桥手术、支架置入还是药物治疗?
Clin Res Cardiol. 2006 Apr;95(4):195-203. doi: 10.1007/s00392-006-0365-z. Epub 2006 Feb 27.