Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, K-57, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Health Educ Behav. 2012 Feb;39(1):57-66. doi: 10.1177/1090198111407185. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
Effective early detection strategies for ovarian cancer do not exist. Current screening guidelines recommend against routine screening using CA-125 alone or in combination with transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS). In this study, the authors used the 2008 DocStyles survey to measure clinician beliefs about the effectiveness of CA-125 and TVS in the asymptomatic, average-risk population in the United States. To assess the need for provider education, the authors used the 2008 HealthStyles survey to examine public awareness of CA-125. Of 1,250 physician respondents, 40.4% said both CA-125 and TVS were effective screens, and 28.3% said neither was an effective ovarian cancer screen in the asymptomatic, average-risk population. Obstetrician/gynecologists [OB/GYNs] more often had responses consistent with current guidelines: 56.5% of OB/GYNs, compared with 34.4% and 29.8% of family/general practitioners and internists, respectively, said neither CA-125 nor TVS was an effective screen. Almost one third of women surveyed reported having heard of CA-125, and about one tenth said they had the CA-125 test. These findings support the need for additional provider education. Educational efforts should include lack of evidence for, as well as the potential harms of, screening for ovarian cancer with CA-125.
目前不存在有效的卵巢癌早期检测策略。目前的筛查指南建议反对单独或联合使用 CA-125 和经阴道超声(TVS)进行常规筛查。在这项研究中,作者使用 2008 年的 DocStyles 调查来衡量临床医生对 CA-125 和 TVS 在无症状、平均风险人群中的有效性的看法。为了评估提供者教育的需求,作者使用 2008 年的 HealthStyles 调查来检查公众对 CA-125 的认识。在 1250 名医生受访者中,40.4%的人表示 CA-125 和 TVS 都是有效的筛查方法,28.3%的人表示在无症状、平均风险人群中,两者都不是有效的卵巢癌筛查方法。妇产科医生(OB/GYNs)的回答更符合当前的指南:56.5%的 OB/GYNs 表示 CA-125 和 TVS 都不是有效的筛查方法,而分别有 34.4%和 29.8%的家庭/全科医生和内科医生表示 CA-125 和 TVS 都不是有效的筛查方法。近三分之一的接受调查的女性报告听说过 CA-125,约十分之一的人表示她们接受过 CA-125 测试。这些发现支持需要进一步的提供者教育。教育工作应包括缺乏证据以及使用 CA-125 筛查卵巢癌的潜在危害。