Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21):E1402-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822815ff.
Prospective consecutive multicenter case series.
To compare fixation type and amount to curve correction controlled for curve flexibility.
The enhanced spinal purchase from segmental fixation should increase the force implants can exert without failure. This study evaluates whether this translates into correction beyond that expected from preoperative bending radiographs in thoracic curves where maximum correction was feasible (1A, 1B, and nonselective 1C fusions).
One hundred seventy-one Lenke type 1 curves (118 1A, 36 1B, 23 1C) with 2-year follow-up were evaluated for the number and type of fixation points within the main curves compared to the correction obtained on preoperative bend films. SRS scores were compared to the amount of correction.
The number of fixation points both within the curve (P = 0.01) and for each vertebral body (P = 0.002) was larger for curves with greater correction compared to the bend films than those with less correction. Overall absolute correction was best for all screw and screw and wire constructs, followed by hook and screw, and least with hooks. However, compared to the bend films, these differences were not significant (P = 0.132). For all groups, the SRS scores significantly improved (P < 0.001), and was slightly more notable for the all screw constructs than other instrumentation patterns (P = 0.023). However, there were no significant difference in this improvement between those correcting more and those correcting less than the bend films (P = 0.578).
Absolute curve correction improved most with all pedicle screw and screw and wire constructs, but, when compared to bending films, the number of fixation points is more important than fixation type for curve correction. Although SRS scores improved the most in those with all screw constructs, the significance of this improvement is uncertain, and the SRS scores did not relate to whether curve correction was more or less than the bend films.
前瞻性连续多中心病例系列研究。
比较固定类型和数量与曲线矫正,控制曲线灵活性。
节段性固定的增强脊柱获得力应增加植入物在不失效的情况下施加的力。本研究评估了在最大矫正可行的胸弯中(1A、1B 和非选择性 1C 融合),这是否转化为超出术前弯曲片预期的矫正,在这些曲线中,增强的脊柱获得力应增加植入物在不失效的情况下施加的力。
评估了 171 例 Lenke 1 型曲线(118 例 1A、36 例 1B、23 例 1C),术后随访 2 年,比较了主要曲线内固定点的数量和类型与术前弯曲片获得的矫正。SRS 评分与矫正量进行比较。
与矫正量较少的弯片相比,矫正量较大的弯片在曲内(P = 0.01)和每个椎体(P = 0.002)的固定点数都更多。所有螺钉和螺钉加钢丝结构的绝对矫正效果最好,其次是钩和螺钉,而钩的效果最差。然而,与弯片相比,这些差异没有统计学意义(P = 0.132)。对于所有组,SRS 评分均显著改善(P < 0.001),且全螺钉结构改善更为明显,优于其他器械类型(P = 0.023)。然而,在弯片矫正较多和矫正较少的患者之间,这种改善没有显著差异(P = 0.578)。
所有椎弓根螺钉和螺钉加钢丝结构的绝对曲线矫正效果最好,但与弯曲片相比,固定点数比固定类型更重要。尽管全螺钉结构的 SRS 评分改善最大,但这种改善的意义不确定,SRS 评分与曲线矫正是否大于或小于弯曲片无关。