• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经双源 MDCT 检测主动脉血流速度对主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的诊断价值。

Transaortic flow velocity from dual-source MDCT for the diagnosis of aortic stenosis severity.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jul 1;78(1):127-35. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22958.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.22958
PMID:21681900
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe a method for the estimation of transaortic flow from multidetector computer tomography (MDCT).

BACKGROUND

Cardiac MDCT may not allow instantaneous flow measurement yet the components of flow, namely, volume change over time and lumenal area are recorded.

METHODS

In 36 patients, the transaortic flow velocity was determined on transthoracic echocardiography and also with cardiac MDCT as follows: On MDCT an axial orientation through the aortic root was obtained so that the nadir of all three aortic leaflets could be seen simultaneously in one axial image. Aortic valve area (AVA) was determined by planimetry and left ventricular volumes by endocardial border mapping at every 5% increment of the RR intervals. Flow velocity was then calculated as the incremental ejection volume ÷ duration of the increment ÷ AVA.

RESULTS

The transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) peak velocity and MDCT peak velocity were highly correlated (r = 0.75, P < 0.01). Transaortic peak velocity was higher when measured by MDCT as compared to TTE, with respectively a median [IQ-range] of 4.5 [2.9-5.3] and 4.0 [3.0-4.6], P < 0.01. For the diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis greater concordance with TTE peak velocity was seen with MDCT peak velocity (sensitivity 100%, specificity 76%) than with MDCT AVA (sensitivity 74%, specificity 76%).

CONCLUSIONS

We show for the first time that transaortic flow velocity can be estimated by dual-source MDCT and has a better sensitivity for the detection of severe aortic stenosis than AVA planimetry when compared to the gold standard of TTE peak flow velocity.

摘要

目的

描述一种从多层计算机断层扫描(MDCT)估计跨主动脉流量的方法。

背景

心脏 MDCT 可能不允许即时流量测量,但记录了流量的组成部分,即随时间的体积变化和管腔面积。

方法

在 36 例患者中,通过经胸超声心动图和心脏 MDCT 确定跨主动脉流速,如下所示:在 MDCT 上,通过获得穿过主动脉根部的轴向方向,以便能够在一个轴向图像中同时看到所有三个主动脉瓣叶的最低点。通过平面测量法确定主动脉瓣口面积(AVA),并在心内边界映射的每 5%RR 间隔增量处确定左心室容积。然后,将流速计算为增量射血容积÷增量持续时间÷AVA。

结果

经胸超声心动图(TTE)的峰值速度和 MDCT 的峰值速度高度相关(r = 0.75,P < 0.01)。与 TTE 相比,MDCT 测量的跨主动脉峰值速度更高,中位数[IQ 范围]分别为 4.5[2.9-5.3]和 4.0[3.0-4.6],P < 0.01。对于严重主动脉瓣狭窄的诊断,与 MDCT AVA 相比,MDCT 峰值速度与 TTE 峰值速度具有更好的一致性(敏感性 100%,特异性 76%)(敏感性 74%,特异性 76%)。

结论

我们首次表明,跨主动脉流速可以通过双源 MDCT 估计,并且与 TTE 峰值流速相比,用于检测严重主动脉瓣狭窄的 AVA 平面测量法具有更好的敏感性。

相似文献

1
Transaortic flow velocity from dual-source MDCT for the diagnosis of aortic stenosis severity.经双源 MDCT 检测主动脉血流速度对主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的诊断价值。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jul 1;78(1):127-35. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22958.
2
Comparison of dual-source computed tomography for the quantification of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis versus transthoracic echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic assessment.双源 CT 对主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣口面积的定量评估与经胸超声心动图及有创血流动力学评估的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Dec 1;104(11):1561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.07.024.
3
Effect of the ellipsoid shape of the left ventricular outflow tract on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis.左心室流出道椭圆形形态对主动脉瓣狭窄时主动脉瓣面积超声心动图评估的影响。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 Jan-Feb;8(1):52-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
4
Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.应用心血管磁共振评估主动脉瓣狭窄:相位对比心血管磁共振原始半自动分析与多普勒超声心动图的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):604-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.971218. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
5
Integration of 3D imaging data in the assessment of aortic stenosis: impact on classification of disease severity.三维成像数据在主动脉瓣狭窄评估中的整合:对疾病严重程度分类的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Sep;4(5):566-73. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.964916. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
6
Aortic valve area assessed with 320-detector computed tomography: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography.320 排 CT 评估主动脉瓣口面积:与经胸超声心动图的比较。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jan;30(1):165-73. doi: 10.1007/s10554-013-0295-6. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
7
The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.不和谐严重钙化主动脉瓣疾病分级的复杂性:联合多普勒超声心动图和计算机断层扫描研究的新见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 17;62(24):2329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1621. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
8
Prognostic value of multi-detector computed tomography in asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis.多排螺旋计算机断层扫描在无症状主动脉瓣狭窄中的预后价值
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 15;203:331-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.10.088. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
9
Aortic valve area calculation in aortic stenosis by CT and Doppler echocardiography.CT 和多普勒超声心动图计算主动脉瓣狭窄的主动脉瓣口面积。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;8(3):248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.009.
10
Influence of aortic valve leaflet calcification on dynamic aortic valve motion assessed by cardiac computed tomography.心脏计算机断层扫描评估主动脉瓣叶钙化对主动脉瓣动态运动的影响。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Nov-Dec;10(6):485-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Aug 23.