Suppr超能文献

一项比较阿瓦糖尿病(罗格列酮/二甲双胍)与二甲双胍在药物初治 2 型糖尿病患者中 80 周治疗后长期血糖控制和骨密度疗效和安全性的随机、平行组、双盲、多中心研究。

A randomized, parallel group, double-blind, multicentre study comparing the efficacy and safety of Avandamet (rosiglitazone/metformin) and metformin on long-term glycaemic control and bone mineral density after 80 weeks of treatment in drug-naïve type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Universidade Católica de Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011 Nov;13(11):1036-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01461.x.

Abstract

AIM

The purpose of this study was to evaluate if superior glycaemic control could be achieved with Avandamet® (rosiglitazone/metformin/AVM) compared with metformin (MET) monotherapy, and if glycaemic effects attained with AVM are durable over 18 months of treatment. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone biomarkers were evaluated in a subgroup of patients.

METHODS

This was a phase IV, randomized, double-blind, multi-centre study in 688, drug naÏve, male and female patients who had an established clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Patients were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio either to AVM or MET.

RESULTS

As initial therapy in patients with T2DM, AVM was superior to MET in achieving statistically significant reductions in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (p < 0.0001) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (p < 0.001), with more patients reaching recommended HbA1c and FPG targets for intensive glycaemic control. The glycaemic effects attained with AVM compared to MET monotherapy were durable over 18 months of treatment. In the bone substudy, AVM was associated with a significantly lower BMD in comparison with MET at week 80 in the lumbar spine and total hip (p < 0.0012 and p = 0.0005, respectively). Between-treatment differences were not statistically significant for distal one-third of radius BMD, femoral neck BMD or total BMD.

CONCLUSION

Superior glycaemic control was achieved with AVM compared with MET monotherapy. The superior glycaemic effects were shown to be durable over 18 months of treatment. AVM was associated with a significantly reduced BMD in comparison with MET at week 80 in the lumbar spine and total hip.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估与二甲双胍(MET)单药治疗相比,文迪雅®(罗格列酮/二甲双胍/AVM)能否实现更好的血糖控制,以及 AVM 的血糖疗效是否在 18 个月的治疗中持久。对部分患者进行了骨密度(BMD)和骨生物标志物评估。

方法

这是一项在 688 名药物初治、男性和女性 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中进行的、为期 18 个月的、随机、双盲、多中心的 IV 期研究。患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配到 AVM 或 MET 组。

结果

作为 T2DM 患者的初始治疗,AVM 在降低糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)(p < 0.0001)和空腹血糖(FPG)(p < 0.001)方面优于 MET,更多患者达到强化血糖控制的 HbA1c 和 FPG 目标。与 MET 单药治疗相比,AVM 的血糖疗效在 18 个月的治疗中持久。在骨亚研究中,与 MET 相比,AVM 在第 80 周时腰椎和全髋的 BMD 显著降低(p < 0.0012 和 p = 0.0005)。在桡骨远 1/3 段、股骨颈 BMD 或总 BMD 方面,两种治疗方法之间的差异无统计学意义。

结论

与 MET 单药治疗相比,AVM 可实现更好的血糖控制。18 个月的治疗结果表明,血糖疗效持久。与 MET 相比,在第 80 周时,AVM 在腰椎和全髋的 BMD 显著降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验