Suppr超能文献

不同抗高血糖治疗方案对 2 型糖尿病患者骨转换标志物和骨密度的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Impact of Different Anti-Hyperglycaemic Treatments on Bone Turnover Markers and Bone Mineral Density in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Chester Medical School, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Society, University of Chester, Chester CH1 4BJ, UK.

Metabolic Bone Service, Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry SY10 7AG, UK.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 22;25(14):7988. doi: 10.3390/ijms25147988.

Abstract

Diabetic bone disease (DBD) is a frequent complication in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), characterised by altered bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover marker (BTMs) levels. The impact of different anti-diabetic medications on the skeleton remains unclear, and studies have reported conflicting results; thus, the need for a comprehensive systematic review is of paramount importance. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcomes assessed were changes in BMD in relation to different anatomical sites and BTMs, including mainly P1NP and CTX as well as OPG, OCN, B-ALP and RANK-L. Risk of bias was evaluated using the JADAD score. The meta-analysis of 19 randomised controlled trials comprising 4914 patients showed that anti-diabetic medications overall increased BMD at the lumbar spine (SMD: 0.93, 95% CI [0.13, 1.73], = 0.02), femoral neck (SMD: 1.10, 95% CI [0.47, 1.74], = 0.0007) and in total hip (SMD: 0.33, 95% CI [-0.25, 0.92], = 0.27) in comparison with placebo, but when compared with metformin, the overall effect favoured metformin over other treatments (SMD: -0.23, 95% CI [-0.39, -0.07], = 0.004). GLP-1 receptor agonists and insulin analogues seem to improve BMD compared to placebo, while SGLT2 inhibitors and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) showed no significant effect, although studies' number cannot lead to safe conclusions. For BTMs, TZDs significantly increased P1NP levels compared to placebo. However, no significant differences were observed for CTX, B-ALP, OCN, OPG, and RANK-L between anti-diabetic drugs and metformin or placebo. High heterogeneity and diverse follow-up durations among studies were evident, which obscures the validity of the results. This review highlights the variable effects of anti-diabetic drugs on DBD in T2DM patients, emphasising the need for long-term trials with robust designs to better understand these relationships and inform clinical decisions.

摘要

糖尿病性骨病(DBD)是 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者常见的并发症,其特征为骨矿物质密度(BMD)和骨转换标志物(BTMs)水平改变。不同的抗糖尿病药物对骨骼的影响仍不清楚,且研究结果相互矛盾;因此,进行全面的系统综述至关重要。在 PubMed 和 Cochrane Library 中进行了系统检索。主要评估指标为不同解剖部位的 BMD 变化以及 BTMs(主要为 PINP 和 CTX 以及 OPG、OCN、B-ALP 和 RANK-L)的变化。使用 JADAD 评分评估偏倚风险。纳入 19 项随机对照试验(共 4914 例患者)的荟萃分析结果显示,与安慰剂相比,抗糖尿病药物总体上增加了腰椎(SMD:0.93,95%CI [0.13,1.73], = 0.02)、股骨颈(SMD:1.10,95%CI [0.47,1.74], = 0.0007)和全髋关节(SMD:0.33,95%CI [-0.25,0.92], = 0.27)的 BMD,但与二甲双胍相比,总体疗效更倾向于其他治疗药物(SMD:-0.23,95%CI [-0.39,-0.07], = 0.004)。GLP-1 受体激动剂和胰岛素类似物似乎比安慰剂更能改善 BMD,而 SGLT2 抑制剂和噻唑烷二酮类(TZDs)则没有显著效果,尽管研究数量无法得出安全的结论。对于 BTMs,TZDs 与安慰剂相比显著增加了 PINP 水平。然而,抗糖尿病药物与二甲双胍或安慰剂之间,CTX、B-ALP、OCN、OPG 和 RANK-L 无显著差异。研究之间存在明显的高度异质性和不同的随访时间,这使得结果的有效性变得模糊。本综述强调了 T2DM 患者中不同抗糖尿病药物对 DBD 的不同影响,强调需要进行长期、设计稳健的临床试验,以更好地了解这些关系并为临床决策提供依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370b/11277066/32eecb6452fd/ijms-25-07988-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验