• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众参与邻里野火减灾和准备:来自加拿大、美国和澳大利亚的案例研究。

Public engagement in neighbourhood level wildfire mitigation and preparedness: case studies from Canada, the US and Australia.

机构信息

Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, 1-26 Earth Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2011 Oct;92(10):2524-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.017.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.017
PMID:21684061
Abstract

This study examined neighbourhood level wildfire mitigation programs being implemented in neighbourhoods in Canada (FireSmart-ForestWise), Australia (Community Fireguard) and the US (Firewise Communities). Semi-structured interviews were completed with 19 residents participating in the programs. A wide range of activities were completed as part of the three programs. Despite differences between the three programs, participants appeared to participate in the programs for three main reasons: Fire experience, agency involvement, and personal and family protection. A fire therefore provides a window of opportunity to engage residents in neighbourhood level wildfire mitigation programs. The neighbourhood level wildfire mitigation programs helped to reduce the wildfire risk, but also enhanced both community resilience and relationships between residents and government agencies.

摘要

本研究考察了在加拿大(FireSmart-ForestWise)、澳大利亚(Community Fireguard)和美国(Firewise Communities)的社区实施的邻里野火缓解计划。对参与这些计划的 19 名居民进行了半结构化访谈。这三个项目都完成了各种活动。尽管这三个项目之间存在差异,但参与者似乎出于三个主要原因参与这些项目:火灾经历、机构参与以及个人和家庭保护。因此,火灾为让居民参与邻里野火缓解计划提供了一个机会之窗。邻里野火缓解计划有助于降低野火风险,同时增强了社区的弹性以及居民与政府机构之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Public engagement in neighbourhood level wildfire mitigation and preparedness: case studies from Canada, the US and Australia.公众参与邻里野火减灾和准备:来自加拿大、美国和澳大利亚的案例研究。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Oct;92(10):2524-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.017.
2
Factors affecting community-agency trust before, during and after a wildfire: an Australian case study.影响野火前、中、后社区与机构间信任的因素:一项澳大利亚案例研究。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 30;130:10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.037. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
3
Engagement in local and collaborative wildfire risk mitigation planning across the western U.S.-Evaluating participation and diversity in Community Wildfire Protection Plans.参与美国西部当地及合作性的野火风险缓解规划——评估社区野火保护计划中的参与情况和多样性。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0263757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263757. eCollection 2022.
4
Coupling the Biophysical and Social Dimensions of Wildfire Risk to Improve Wildfire Mitigation Planning.结合野火风险的生物物理和社会维度以改进野火缓解规划。
Risk Anal. 2015 Aug;35(8):1393-406. doi: 10.1111/risa.12373. Epub 2015 May 13.
5
Does Wildfire Open a Policy Window? Local Government and Community Adaptation After Fire in the United States.野火是否开启了政策窗口?美国火灾后的地方政府和社区适应
Environ Manage. 2018 Aug;62(2):210-228. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1030-9. Epub 2018 May 15.
6
Homeowner firewise behaviors in fire-prone central Oregon: An exploration of the attitudinal, situational, and cultural worldviews impacting pre-fire mitigation actions.俄勒冈州中部火灾频发地区房主的明智防火行为:对影响火灾前减灾行动的态度、情境和文化世界观的探索。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Feb 1;327:116811. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116811. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
7
Does Place Attachment Predict Wildfire Mitigation and Preparedness? A Comparison of Wildland-Urban Interface and Rural Communities.场所依恋能否预测野火缓解与准备情况?对城乡交错带和农村社区的比较。
Environ Manage. 2016 Jan;57(1):148-62. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0597-7. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
8
Bridging scales for landscape-level wildfire adaptation: A case study of the Kittitas Fire Adapted Communities Coalition.景观尺度野火适应性的衔接尺度:以基特塔斯火灾适应社区联盟为例。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb;351:119818. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119818. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
9
Is Experience the Best Teacher? Knowledge, Perceptions, and Awareness of Wildfire Risk.是否经验就是最好的老师?对野火风险的认识、看法和了解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 8;18(16):8385. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168385.
10
Expecting the unexpected: predicting physiological and psychological wildfire preparedness from perceived risk, responsibility, and obstacles.意料之外:从感知风险、责任和障碍预测生理和心理的野火准备情况。
Risk Anal. 2013 Oct;33(10):1829-43. doi: 10.1111/risa.12037. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Increasing multi-hazard climate risk and financial and health impacts on northern homeowners.增加多灾害气候风险以及对北方房主的经济和健康影响。
Ambio. 2024 Mar;53(3):389-405. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01951-z. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
2
Information Sharing and Community Resilience: Toward a Whole Community Approach to Surveillance and Combatting the "Infodemic".信息共享与社区韧性:迈向以全社区为导向的监测与抗击“信息疫情”方法
World Med Health Policy. 2021 Sep;13(3):581-592. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.428. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
3
Disasters can happen to anybody: The case of Korea.
灾难可能降临到任何人身上:韩国的案例。
Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2016 Feb;57:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
4
Does Wildfire Open a Policy Window? Local Government and Community Adaptation After Fire in the United States.野火是否开启了政策窗口?美国火灾后的地方政府和社区适应
Environ Manage. 2018 Aug;62(2):210-228. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1030-9. Epub 2018 May 15.
5
Modelling associations between public understanding, engagement and forest conditions in the Inland Northwest, USA.美国西北部内陆地区公众认知、参与度与森林状况之间的关联建模。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 11;10(2):e0117975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117975. eCollection 2015.