Ha Kyoo-Man
Department of Emergency Management, Inje University, 197 Inje-Ro, Gimhae-City, Gyeongnam, 50834, Korea.
Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2016 Feb;57:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
In Korea, there is a pervasive feeling of invincibility to the point that people and organizations do not believe that disasters can strike them. This has impact on the level of preparedness for disasters. This study aims to delve into how Korea has to change its governmental policies/practices with some private partners' efforts to mitigate disaster risks. A case study was utilized as the major methodology by comparing exclusive management with inclusive management. These two approaches have been comparatively analyzed via four variables, namely the central government, the local governments, the incident commander, and other stakeholders. The major finding is that Korea's practices and policies have to evolve from the current exclusive management into future-oriented inclusive management. Moreover, the importance of communication, cooperation, collaboration, and multi-discipline coordination is discussed. Additionally, the problem of reductionism and equal participation among all stakeholders, as well as the resistance from vested interests, are recognized and elaborated for Korea and the international community.
在韩国,人们普遍有一种无敌的感觉,以至于个人和组织都不相信灾难会降临到他们身上。这对灾难防范水平产生了影响。本研究旨在深入探讨韩国如何在一些私营合作伙伴的努力下改变其政府政策/做法,以减轻灾害风险。通过将独家管理与包容性管理进行比较,采用案例研究作为主要方法。通过中央政府、地方政府、事件指挥官和其他利益相关者这四个变量对这两种方法进行了比较分析。主要发现是,韩国的做法和政策必须从当前的独家管理向面向未来的包容性管理转变。此外,还讨论了沟通、合作、协作和多学科协调的重要性。此外,还认识到并阐述了韩国和国际社会存在的还原论问题、所有利益相关者的平等参与问题以及既得利益者的抵制问题。