Parnassia Addiction Research Centre (PARC), Brijder Addiction Treatment, Parnassia Bavo Group, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Dec 1;119(1-2):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.05.021. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
To meet the treatment needs of the growing number of adolescents who seek help for cannabis use problems, new or supplementary types of treatment are needed. We investigated whether multidimensional family therapy (MDFT) was more effective than cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in treatment-seeking adolescents with a DSM-IV cannabis use disorder in The Netherlands.
One hundred and nine adolescents participated in a randomized controlled trial, with study assessments at baseline and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months following baseline. They were randomly assigned to receive either outpatient MDFT or CBT, both with a planned treatment duration of 5-6 months. Main outcome measures were cannabis use, delinquent behavior, treatment response and recovery at one-year follow-up, and treatment intensity and retention.
MDFT was not found to be superior to CBT on any of the outcome measures. Adolescents in both treatments did show significant and clinically meaningful reductions in cannabis use and delinquency from baseline to one-year follow-up, with treatment effects in the moderate range. A substantial percentage of adolescents in both groups met the criteria for treatment response at month 12. Treatment intensity and retention was significantly higher in MDFT than in CBT. Post hoc subgroup analyses suggested that high problem severity subgroups at baseline may benefit more from MDFT than from CBT.
The current study indicates that MDFT and CBT are equally effective in reducing cannabis use and delinquent behavior in adolescents with a cannabis use disorder in The Netherlands.
为满足越来越多寻求大麻使用问题治疗的青少年的治疗需求,需要新的或补充类型的治疗方法。我们研究了多维家庭治疗(MDFT)是否比认知行为疗法(CBT)更有效治疗荷兰有 DSM-IV 大麻使用障碍的青少年。
109 名青少年参加了一项随机对照试验,在基线和基线后 3、6、9 和 12 个月进行研究评估。他们被随机分配接受门诊 MDFT 或 CBT,计划治疗时间均为 5-6 个月。主要结局指标是大麻使用、犯罪行为、治疗反应和一年随访时的恢复情况,以及治疗强度和保留率。
MDFT 在任何结果指标上都不比 CBT 优越。两种治疗方法的青少年在基线到一年随访期间,大麻使用和犯罪行为均显著且具有临床意义的减少,治疗效果处于中等范围。两组中有相当一部分青少年在 12 个月时符合治疗反应标准。MDFT 的治疗强度和保留率明显高于 CBT。事后亚组分析表明,基线时高问题严重程度亚组可能从 MDFT 中获益多于 CBT。
本研究表明,MDFT 和 CBT 在减少荷兰有大麻使用障碍的青少年的大麻使用和犯罪行为方面同样有效。